|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Arnaldo Vescovo www.juzaphoto.com/p/ArnaldoVescovo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS Pros: This is certainly a well-built optics (although not at the Zeiss zoom levels) and equipped with a focal length excursion really useful for those who create architectural images and interior photos. Cons: Loss of sharpness at the edges (especially at shorter focal lengths); also closing the diaphragm sharpness at the edges improves slightly. Opinion: I previously owned the Sony 10-18 mounted on Sony Nex 7 and Sony alpha 6000 and I thought I would notice a big difference in quality using the Fujinon 10-24 mounted on Fuji XT 20: unfortunately it was not and I have to confirm how much already written by other photographers who report a noticeable loss of quality at the edges even in rather closed diaphragms. In the exemplar in my possession the best diaphragm is f10 but unfortunately there is a noticeable asymmetry in the yield on the two sides of the image, a sign that the lenses of the complex optical scheme have not been perfectly centered; and thank goodness it was a new lens purchased in a Milan store! Unfortunately, I have to note once again that in the era of globalization the standards of control are not as strict as before and the performance of individual specimens of even valuable goals are no longer exactly the same but we must evaluate each individual separately, which is not it is certainly pleasant in the caseof rather expensive lenses. sent on April 01, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Mechanical construction unexceptionable, dial change focal lengths with perfect fluidity. Incredibly major performances (at least in my copy) is almost at maximum aperture, or 4.5 !! Cons: Loss of quality at smaller apertures; regretfully now it is known that the performance of each objective should be analyzed unit by unit, also the objectives Zeiss! Besides, you can not expect that the Zeiss products in Thailand undergo the same stringent quality control of a Zeiss built in Germany or Japan! Opinion: In all focal lengths and all diaphragms there is little difference in quality between the center and edges of the image so I suggest you use this light always diaphragm rather open. A goal of average weight makes this light highly recommended for anyone who owns a Sony A7r: together the two instruments do not reach the weight of one kilogram. RNA part of the reserves of which I wrote, I think the Sony 16-35 perspective of high quality that can be used with satisfaction with all mirrorless Sony, even those equipped with the APS sensor which acts as an excellent 24-50 , although not light! sent on July 22, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
