|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ivano Frosi www.juzaphoto.com/p/IvanoFrosi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR Pros: Light, sharpness, contrast, excellent Vr, quality / price ratio, strength and quality "macro." Cons: Catch the hood (negligible and ovviabile), not weather sealed (ovviabile), suffering from slight chromatic aberration and Autofocus not fast. Opinion: This is a review date of my photographic experience. It needed a good zoom lens ... (the quality to mè is primary!) ... The choice was between the Sigma S, and the Nikkor. Having had the opportunity to make a direct comparison between the two zoom to any focal aperture and ISO settings, I chose the Nikkor, purchased a month and tried in a variety of lighting conditions and natural environments. Practical birdlife and I was amazed at the quality of this remarkable optical zoom, (I'm used to the 300 to 600 f2.8 and f4.0), do not liken it to his brother 200/400 f4 ... but not for long ... trasportabilissimo is in action "slewing" like a dream I, the "smooth" use of D 7200 which makes me 750 mm is not much, but we know that practicing the WildLife mm are never sufficient ... the Vr is excellent and I point out that given the nature of the zoom should be used freehand for the speed of the action, to seize the moment ... l & #39, AF is not very fast and, as I said before suffering a slight chromatic aberration. The fixed f.5.6 electromagnetic diaphragm is accurate, do not say it can be a primary goal ... that's a status that belongs to the 300 to 600 f2.8 and f4.0 ... but if, had the most responsive autofocus i would say that it could be in its case ... the excursion for zooming is "long" but resolves accessory / s offering the photographic market, for the weather sealing is solved by placing a good lens cover ... but who of all of you even when it rains photographer taking into account the lighting conditions or jumps in a sandstorm ??! Brava NIKON we were not deluso.rnA this remarkable zoom vote as I give a nice 9.7: see the photos that I put in this site with this zoom lens in galleries ... butterflies and birds. sent on October 20, 2016 |
 | Nikon F3 Pros: Machine body super reliable and robust even at low temperatures, in any situation and in any place !!! rnTempo ago, when building something, it was done not to allow it to last an eternity. Cons: A small clarification in the negative, ... is perhaps the method of operational when you use the dedicated flash mounted his attack ... which goes to occlude the manual rewind, by hand lever, the film ... this is But ovviabile mounting his Motor Driver (MD-4) dedicated. Opinion: Reference ... the status Symbol of Gota for analog photography professional the years "80/2005 ... but even now, can give much satisfaction to lucky owners ... a camera body PROFESSIONAL ... TRUE !!!, not There is no place on earth where she was not! ... was also in the cosmos ... that say more than that, for its reliability and accuracy ??! rnNON he has never betrayed a slightest time ... menochè mistakes I !. sent on January 23, 2016 |
 | Lowepro ProTrekker 650 AW Pros: Knowing wisely distribute the weight, it is very balanced and easier on the other backpacks Lowepro, excellent workmanship and durability of the materials used ... thought for the photograph and the photographer who takes him ... with various fillings and regulations that you can go up on top of the world with this photo backpack! Cons: Perhaps a bigger pocket inside the hinged flap which flips and better care (as symbols) of pockets for cards ... looking always at home Lowepro. Opinion: I use it mainly for WildLife ... of course ... and I'll put: Nikkor f4 G 600 with its hood, 80/200 f2.8 with its neoprene cover, two cameras and F6 and D7200 with its Battery Pack with accessories and neoprene covers two Tele, Sirui tripod R5214 XL tied sideways or, if necessary monopod always Sirui P-424 and finally folding stool ... this is my "state of war", I repeat, distributing good weight remains well Balanced also going in motion ... reducing weight "extra" that I add, is also facing a lot of fun to go mountain climbing ... not though. sent on August 19, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: Camera of "thick" Dynamic range and sharpness, go hand in hand in the details more "fine" ... robust and "savings: intense use with 300 f2.8 with various multipliers, 2.5 / 3 days. Energy. .. held at high iso as a PRO. FX, very valuable all ... The Nikon has recovered credibility with this ... The D7200 'Autofocus is fast. Cons: Two notes ... rn1) The front dial on the handle is too interior ... See also, use with guanti.rn2) would ask more precise autofocus tracking. Opinion: Photographer from standing (always Nikon) initially, and that I still (Furche the 801), FM-2N, 801, F3, F6 (exceptional) ... coming from the film (and continuing), wanting to take the "step" to complement the digital I decided to do it with the D 7200 ... believe me I did not regret and, I venture to say that I recognize all the experience in this Nikon "Piccoletta" ... I had the opportunity to try out various pro . Nikon and Canon ... but this makes the "beard" to many and think that is APS-C ... compact, handy, robust ... I highly recommend the battery-pack to be able to appeal in solidarity in any position it takes hold of the camera ... and I must say that the "little one", he unleashed an uncontrollable desire to take pictures ... exceedingly to save on expensive films ... there are other things you need but in digital. rnTempo permitting, I'll post some photos with the D7200, thanks to the attention given. sent on June 06, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
