|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
William88 www.juzaphoto.com/p/William88  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Excellent value for money, not too excessive weight, good colors, good sharpness, autofocus fast enough ,, stabilizer noisy but excellent Cons: Slightly soft to 300 mm but nothing that dim Opinion: First, as many have said the value for money is nothing short of excellent .. I used it for a whole day and I was very pleased. The stabilizer and noisy but does more than his duty well, autofocus is pretty fast, softness on 300 mm is slightly noticeable perhaps depends on the conditions in which you shoot. In any case, light and not very evident. rnil weight quite content but do not know how far my impression may be useful as I use in combination with Canon 24 70 LL known to be rather pesante.rnIn any case it is highly recommended and for what I saw to what I know at this price there is almost nothing better. rnciao all sent on November 24, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: price, quality and yield of the photo, "school ship" Cons: plasticotto, autofocus inaccurate and noisy Opinion: I think the 50mm 1.8 is the best quality / price ratio of the goals canon. It 'a plasticotto and the autofocus is noisy as hell, seems to go diesel. (On the other hand has been in production for more than 20 years). But besides these two flaws, absolutely surmountable, is a lens with emotions and that really changes the way you do photography. I think that is a must for those who are beginners. What little I learned I owe to 50ino. Bought in 2011 and sold six or seven months ago to almost the same purchase price. I regret that and I think it will take it back. sent on October 30, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: compact all-rounder. Cons: Poor quality materials, obvious vignetting at full length, when shooting "vertical" or hold the stock market does not stand still. Opinion: How many goals to be set, it is clear that one can not expect a great goal. It 'was my first when I was less than beginner. He went with the 60D and the beginning I found it bad, as I have pretty good until I swapped with a 24-70 L series used. The move was traumatic (in a good way), as is normal since we are talking of one of the best optical L.rnI defects that were riscontravo immediately vignetting to 135 mm above and the fact that when I tried to make pictures with the machine "low" to 18mm because I could hardly objective "down" and could not keep up. Brought to the store, they told me it was a fault of all. So much so that the seller I opened another making me notice the defect. But nothing so grave.rnDa discard? Maybe not. For those who have claims is an effective all-rounder. I see it more objectively from entry level used in an absolutely beginner. For those who want to make good scenery, good pictures and some experiments. rnIl seems to be the newimproved slightly moist. sent on October 30, 2014 |
 | Canon 60D Pros: Versatile, high quality picture, ergonomics satisfactory, rolling screen, video quality, solidity and reliability. Cons: High ISO improvement, devaluation Opinion: I have this little gem from 2012, and from there I have not had any problems, even when I put the machine in considerable stress. I happen but also not to use it for long periods. It is very close to the business and for people like me, and an amateur is a true loyal companion and thoughtful. Sometimes I remain impressed by what I can do. It is easy to use, intuitive and the rings are solid, the screen has an excellent definition and videos are insanely good. I bought the kit 18-135, an objective that I sold for a 24/70 f2.8 The first series that does justice to this camera. Objective, since the body is also able to cover even a bit longer mm. Small defect ios a bit unstable at 6400 or a little less, but I always remedied with one or two stops +. rnIl worst fault is common to all the canon, the devaluation. As satisfied, I flashed the idea of ??moving to a full frame. But honestly, given the young age of the machine, I'd rather invest in someone obiettivi.rnMagari need some shots of theNo more on the multi-shot, but I would say to those requirements necessary to aim at professional level absolutely elevato.rnTutt'oggi and an excellent body in my opinion sent on October 29, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
