|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Igino www.juzaphoto.com/p/Igino ![]() |
![]() | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Macro II Pros: construction quality, speed AF, nuts Cons: soft to TA 200 mm Opinion: 'A goal that has a good build quality, focus with a good response, smooth rings; but excels in sharpness TA mostly 200 mm, it seems to suffer from the front focus. Instead, in 70-85 - 135-160 is a TA accettabile.rnSinceramente a sharpness not recommend this model, it was better although the former had a maf less reactive and less nuts fluide.rnLe photos are neutral and not very contrasted, compared to Nikon of recent generations, but many prefer photo for more muted colors. Rating: 6.5 sent on January 29, 2017 |
![]() | Fujifilm X-E1 Pros: Machine has an aesthetically acccattivante design vintage style, compact and well costruita.rnIl good sensor and allows to take pictures at ISO 3200 with grit that accettabile.rn Cons: Shortly ergonomic, battery short duration (range 100-150 shots, activating only info in the viewfinder) .rnLa bezel compensation often inadvertently moves, as well as the key 'Q'.rnNon for photos sportive.rnPrezzi too high for mirrorless. Opinion: For me that I come from Nikon D70 and D700, I found and still find difficulty in both hold the car, but also to look inside the viewfinder for its response times and in times of light forte.rnComunque, and 'an interesting machine and take home interesting shots with strong contrasts of light in the scene inquadrata.rnPer regarding the electronic viewfinder, with respect to a good SLR has still a long way to be concorrenziale.rnI prices are a bit' excessive and I think buying an X-e2 is not worth the price difference elevata.rnAd today (December 2014) can be purchased new at attractive prices, as I did in io.rnL'obiettivo kit and 'well made and solves pretty well all the problems of distorsione.rnLa maf goes just fine for pictures not particularly movimentate.rnrn sent on December 27, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me