|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
_ep_ www.juzaphoto.com/p/_ep_  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | 7artisans 25mm f/1.8 Pros: Price Construction Weight Size Cons: He's suffering a little light, fluid aperture ring. Opinion: On Fujifilm camera is a good lens, light and small. Yes can safely use already from 1.8, very bright. The aperture ring is not jerky, you have to be careful not to move it. It's a bit soft at the sides up to F4, then it picks up. Perhaps it distorts a bit ' always on the extreme sides, but you notice only on sea horizons, what I would say tolerable and certainly correctable in pp. It has an excellent control of manual MAF, small fixes and everything is easily in focus for objects over 3 meters. It costs less than €100, it's a great buy. sent on June 26, 2018 |
 | 7artisans 12mm f/2.8 Pros: Price, materials, weight Cons: Lens exposed, you can not mount filters, aperture ring without shots Opinion: An excellent wide angle lens for APS-C Nothing makes you regret much more noble lenses. Proven on Fujifilm system, it remains a lightweight compact system with excellent portability. As a photographic quality I would say that it is not a compromise between quality and price there is only quality. Do not notice excessive distortion, the colors are very balanced and faithful to the Fuji system, can not mount UV filter But it does not seem to me that you suffer from problems with the backlight. I found it uncomfortable the aperture ring that does not go jerky but it is fluid like that of the focus and therefore you have to always control the aperture visually and not mentally counting the shots. Obviously this is an advantage for the video department, the MAF changes and aperture closing apertures will be silent and no shots. Wide angle at that price? Definitely should be bought. sent on June 12, 2018 |
 | Samyang Reflex 300mm f/6.3 ED UMC CS Pros: price, weight Cons: the value for money for a slow attack x Fujifilm does not weigh the cons. It is a catadioptric. Opinion: Good lens as it often turns out Samyang, small, lightweight and very economical. Tested on fujifil XPro1. I honestly thought of getting inferior results. In another comment I saw that was given as a negative note the strong vignetting, I have not encountered this problem. (I remember that has no digital socket, then you have to manually insert the lens length and set to shoot without lens) .rnNon has automatism thus stand a must to 2000ms or shots! interesting optical, realistic colors, blurred unconventional. To try to get something different and to take with you in case of need without dragging weight sent on February 16, 2017 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 ED SDM Pros: It is a mono lens ranging from wide angle to tele, good construction, zoom extension block, silent and precise ultrasonic motor, good weight and size Cons: It's a super all do, has the limits of course but all in all does his hard work. Opinion: Constructively excellent, perhaps exaggerated as everything do 18 to 270 the jump is great, but those who buy it for sure will not seek perfection but practicality. From F 6.3 onwards both to 18 and 270 is not bad. From F 3.5 to f 6.3 of intrinsic brightness of the lens The jump is remarkable, the shutter settings in a possible zoom are unpredictable. At less than €300 I recommend it sent on April 10, 2016 |
 | Pentax DA HD 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 ED DC WR Pros: Focal length, tropicalization, quiet inner engine, quick shift, focus, absence of aberrations Cons: He has constant brightness, color subdued compared to the classic Pentax is also soft af 18 !, reduced price when compared to the quality. In a comparison with 18 to 55 kits I can not say who the check. Opinion: nice goal to see and touch, focal lengths in my opinion perfect for those traveling with one goal. rnAimè sharpness is embarrassing, goodbye details with this lens, of ks2 seems to have an AA filter active even at f20 opening, for sure it is not a lama.rnPremesso that I like the detail, natural color or in a bit brighter and I hate to change the time settings and diaphragms if I switch from 20mm to 70mm in a few secondi.rnPer € 600 and more, I definitely expected something better, at least one constant f4. What he wanted? 20 grams more of the lens? Definitely disappointed in the photographic performance, I rate the good costruzione.rnTornerò 16 16 50 45. Or star.rnNuovo expected to cost at least half for what offre.rnMi was informed by a member of Juza, that he also encountered the problem sharpness and that has solved by sending the target in assistance. It seems that suffers from a problem of af or maf engine. I l I returned after a few days, for my part I do not know if the problem is solvebile.rn sent on April 10, 2016 |
 | Pentax K-S2 Pros: af fast, wifi, adjustable screen size and weight and tropical conditions, sensor stabilizzato.per who noted the lack of grip on the remote control or the remote sensor, remember that the machine is fully manageable by smartphone or tablet, just crock. Cons: awkward left joystick button with the screen closed. missing upper LCD, some refinement functional aesthetic type rotating hooks for the shoulder strap, magnesium body, overexposure difficult to manage. Opinion: given that they are the first impressions, I have the camera 15 days and I could not take in all conditions and with any goal, however, as often as for Pentax another great product. rnCome qualities you immediately notice the clarity of the optical viewfinder and the large field of view, follows the digital time swivel and excellent reading in the sun. It opens up a world of shots in very interesting ground level, as well as macro facilitated. the display monitor in detail is not perfect, but much improved compared to a k30. The machine is compact and sits well even if he loses the perfection of k5 and k30, which is not scollano by hand. But after a while you find a great location, that I had to keep the index at the top in the engaged position. on this video selector that if you act to rush you go directly from off-screen was added, but you realize right away. I've never been fond of video cameras, but the convenience of having it on the power button of makes you think that something you could capture the anch and in movie. It has a metal frame but in excellent plastic chassis, but I would have preferred magnesium, maybe they wanted to reduce weight. weight and size ultimately make me think of the choice of the machine, hardly use a tripod. Missing the top status monitor, the retractable screen protrudes from the camera body and almost impossible to press the left button of the joystick. It has many functions to take pictures without going through the post production, all work and they save a lot of time. Only eliminate the defects without affecting other. Board sharpness and highlights (works by ISO of 200in) rnAuto focus very very very fast, even in complete darkness then is not lost much of mind! The seal at high use is excellent, between 100 and 300 there are no substantial differences, and up 800 the result is excellent. The oriented screen I find it great for macro shooting from the floor, with the app and activated wifi is a pleasure. You can leave fixed somewhere and manage all the camera with your smartphone, including af. Significant crop you can do I think grazi6euro; guaranteed Fowa four years. since it is a just released template does not recommend the europe warranty, if something does not work and care goes into europe miss a season of shots as well as a whole lot of pennies in spedizione.rnAspetto expenses other reviews or comments from vostra.rn sent on April 20, 2015 |
 | Pentax DA HD 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED WR Pros: Materials, focal employed, tropical conditions. Cons: Dark at high intermediate distances 150 / 200mm, f you lose a little to 300mm and is slow Opinion: Good very versatile lens, has a great detail to detail, especially at the edges of objects. The colors are natural and right color contrast. K30 with the white balance I had to manually set it automatically because the result has been a point of blue too, both outside and inside. A bit dark at some focal but within the limits for the type of goal. Great value for money and because tropical conditions. Recommended. Compared with a faj75-300 a whole other thing, especially in 'cromaticha aberration in HD quai are absent sent on March 15, 2015 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 16-45mm f/4 ED AL Pros: Weight size brightness Cons: Focal length, construction and material usage Opinion: I left 17 17 for this purpose, apart from the construction and the focal length for now is better as far as the focus, the detail. Sharp and very sharp, the blurry I can still fine but something makes and certainly not essential. Bought used at 150 €, I think it was a great deal sent on December 15, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
