RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

7artisans 25mm f/1.8 : Specifications and Opinions


7artisans 25mm f/1.8

The 7artisans 25mm f/1.8 is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2017. The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 85 €;
12 users have given it an average vote of 7.2 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Sony.

Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   25 mm
 Angle of view   59.9°  (equivalent to a 38mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
 Format   APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/1.8
 Aperture blades   12
 Lenses/Groups   7 elements in 5 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.18 meters
 Reproduction ratio  

 Features
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   Manual Focus
 Internal Focus   No

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   46 mm
 Lens hood   Yes (not supplied)
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   140 g
 Dimensions   51 x 32 mm

 Buy

7artisans 25mm f/1.8, buy on Ebay Ebay



Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 222000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on April 21, 2021

Pros: nobody

Cons: all

Opinion: PdC scale farlocca, exaggerated internal reflections, sharpness last of the class, infinity goes into random focus... Sloppy colors, de-declicated diaphragm beautiful but that does not make you understand the transition from one diaphragm to another. One of the worst optics ever possessed and tried and through circles or my Facebook group Fotogitando I have tried so many. Returned without repentance

avatarjunior
sent on November 23, 2020

Pros: Price.

Cons: Bad

Opinion: I have several 7artisans goals and of all I am more than satisfied but this is really bad two things in particular: at F16 it has a blue reflection in the center of the image and the rings even if they are soft you feel that scratch, from them goddess who after a few turns you are with a metal chip on the sensor. very failed

avatarjunior
sent on October 21, 2020

Pros: Price, sharpness in the center of the image, fluid iris ring

Cons: Poor quality at the edges of the image, slight bubble distortion in the center of the image between f/8 and f/16, unusable in backlight, vignetting, too soft rings

Opinion: Purchased branded Neewer, the quality of the image is acceptable only in the center, approaching the edges you have a very sudden ness of sharpness. This view is in no way suitable for shooting subjects at long distances, let alone landscapes. It lends itself much more to open use, when you intend to highlight a specific detail and not the entire image. Vignetting, especially if increased in post-production, is very useful for "lomo" photography. Overall it's a lens worth what it costs

avatarjunior
sent on October 04, 2019

Pros: cost, focal length useful for set portraits

Cons: poor sharpness (of my specimen), nervous bokeh, poor detail yield in the highlights

Opinion: Purchased used branded Neewer, at TA not my specimen is absolutely not sharp, indeed I would call it decidedly soft. It definitely suffers the light, even if it is indirect. Backlight is unusable. Indoors it goes much better. The detachment of the floors is discreet, but the bokeh is nervous. The chromatic yield is rather washed down. Overall, a lens that is worth what it costs: little. Preferred in all respects the Meike 25mm f/1.8.

avatarjunior
sent on January 15, 2019

Pros: Sharpness at the center already at TA

Cons: Focus loss on the focal plane on the lateral half of the frame

Opinion: I was intrigued by the Chinese manufacturing targets that are on sale on the internet at less than 90 euros, I took the neewer 25 mm 1.8; Looking at it looks like the 7artisan 25 mm, is identical, even the cap. Obviously manual controls for aperture and focus, with focus peaking. Quite fluid ring nuts. Since there are no electrical contacts it does not transfer the EXIF data of the click. I did some testing on the outside, on Sony a6000. First of all, I note that the center is sharper than the kit 16-50 already at F2, at 2.8 improves slightly, 4 improves yet but in a completely negligible. It seems that it is sharp up to about half a distance between the center and the extreme edge, then it worded sharply, I saw the roof of the house that suddenly lost sharpness (which then remains that up almost to the extreme edge, where it is bad), not in a progressive way. In These parts it looks worse than the kit. Infinitely regulated, practically everything is in focus starting from the distance of 20 meters from me until the infinity (about, what I was framing was 7 km). Sharpness at the center even better than the kit, with the usual sharpness loss starting from half way. So if the purpose is to frame something in the middle of the frame, blurting the outer part, is certainly discreet; If you have to cross something that is at 2/3 of the distance from the center to the outer edge, we go wrong. In addition, it suffers by framing objects in backlight as chromatic aberration and flare. I have not noticed distortion, if not to a minimal extent. I did the tests looking at the images with the automatic adjustments in Capture One, with the kit the color rendition is better, probably takes advantage of the profile present, while with the other one uses a generic and the yield is a bit ' vintage. A wall of stones, from SX to DX of the frame and occupies the third central height, a little further down, distance 8 meters, 16-50 to f 4.5, neewer to F 1.8, F2, F 2.4, f 2.8. With the kit the image is evenly in focus, the other in focus the center, less around, to fire the floor at 2-3 meters from the wall. Then a wall of wood grilled with the ivy, distance 5 meters, same diaphragms: The center does not focus, moving away from the center in focus, and even a little ' floor. To f2.8! A few tens of inches of depth of field. At first it seemed to me that he had uneven behavior between different areas of the frame, then instead it seems that it is because the distance of the focus, initially starting from the center varies little, then half frame curve approaching suddenly to Me. With out of focus, I mean really blurry, and having as a comparison the two walls does not affect certain areas of the image, it seems a feature of the lens have this "curvature" that determines areas in focus and not, if I focus in the middle of the wall at the bottom is Blurry while it is in focus on the floor, if I focus the wall further down it becomes less in focus the center of the wall, while it is in focus a wall that is lateral and closer to me... If you imagine looking from above is like drawing an ellipse arc against the wall, starting from the center the Curve little line, then the curvature increases a lot and tends to approach the side... maybe it is the same effect of the optics for non-planar microscope, the most Economic, the image is curved on the sensor, if you focus in the center you have the outline blurred and vice versa. If you photographed 2 people, it is sure that one does not come into focus. It's not for me. It's a pity, because at the center where it is in focus is clearly sharper than the kit, even at F2.




Photos taken with 7artisans 25mm f/1.8

Foto
Conjunction ring
by Stefano Gallo
4 comments, 1793 views  
HI RES 4.5 MP

Foto
Yulia
by Hendi Supriyadi
2 comments, 3165 views
Foto
Self-destruct
by Stefano Gallo
6 comments, 1412 views  
HI RES 4.5 MP

Foto
7Aritsans 25mm F 1.8 tests
by Lightning Diciotto
4 comments, 2115 views
Foto
Lavender
by Lightning Diciotto
0 comments, 1814 views
Foto
Stolen looks
by Ghelardinialberto
0 comments, 520 views  
HI RES 16.0 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Ilsonysta
1 comments, 1247 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Mtb
by Lightning Diciotto
2 comments, 1319 views
Foto
Kisses kisses
by Uriel
3 comments, 580 views  
HI RES 11.7 MP

Foto
Along the streets of the city
by Ilsonysta
3 comments, 1754 views  
HI RES 22.6 MP

Foto
Via Cava
by Lightning Diciotto
3 comments, 706 views
Foto
Alberobello 1
by _ep_
0 comments, 1123 views
Foto
Abandoned cottage
by Giuliano75
2 comments, 671 views  
HI RES 18.8 MP

Foto
Sunday morning
by Uriel
9 comments, 433 views  
HI RES 16.0 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giuliano75
0 comments, 1087 views  
HI RES 21.0 MP

Foto
Matera3
by _ep_
2 comments, 960 views
Foto
Alberobello 2
by _ep_
0 comments, 698 views
Foto
The yakamoz
by Sballone
9 comments, 511 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giuliano75
0 comments, 417 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giuliano75
0 comments, 659 views  
HI RES 23.1 MP

Foto
Towards Ghirlandina
by Ilsonysta
2 comments, 769 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Matera2
by _ep_
0 comments, 1014 views
Foto
Merry Christmas!
by Ilsonysta
2 comments, 906 views  
HI RES 20.3 MP

Foto
Bonsay
by Ilsonysta
0 comments, 560 views  
HI RES 19.6 MP

Foto
Gallipoli
by Lelexxx
0 comments, 740 views
Foto
Via Cava 2
by Lightning Diciotto
2 comments, 799 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giuliano75
0 comments, 449 views  
HI RES 22.4 MP

Foto
Pedal
by Frayamu
0 comments, 60 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

Foto
Vajont Dam
by Sergio Pedone
0 comments, 416 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giuliano75
0 comments, 605 views  
HI RES 20.8 MP

Foto
Fuji vs Nikon
by Uriel
7 comments, 363 views  
HI RES 13.9 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Ilsonysta
0 comments, 617 views  
HI RES 5.3 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Wheels
by AlfioLadisa
0 comments, 116 views  
HI RES 23.7 MP

Foto
Gallipoli 1
by Lelexxx
0 comments, 624 views
Foto
Arc
by Giuliano75
0 comments, 411 views  
HI RES 21.4 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Giuliano75
0 comments, 358 views  
HI RES 20.4 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Uriel
0 comments, 176 views  
HI RES 12.0 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me