|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcello Machelli www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarcelloMachelli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 35mm f/1.8 Di VC USD Pros: Focus from macros at a minimum distance. Stabilization. Construction. Price Cons: The fire in the dark that sometimes releases Opinion: Well-built and sealed lens, for professional use, with an extremely competitive price. The G2 series has taken a clear step forward, for construction, look and substance, employing quality lenses and sealing it from dirt, dust and maybe even water. The issue of lenses 1.4 different from those 1.8 begins to make me smile (not a problem)... I'd figure it out from a 1.8 and 4.5. Portrait set and reportage are his bread, but it also enters some macro-like applications having the ability to focus at very small distances, this combined with a lens 1.8, allows macros or shots "dreamed" with an artistic style. Normally the lens uses it to medium diaphragms and honors the VR that works well. In the dark you have to understand the slow machine body pairing, because the only downside is that it loses fire every tot. With light it's perfect, in AF with darkness can test you. The solution is the best flash in sequence, sure you don't get it wrong (maybe you canni a shot). For architecture, I would use dedicated lenses, this a compact lens, for street, portrait set and reportage. For the front and back focus: CONTROL THE MACCHINA CORPO ! It often depends on the fact that you don't take her to make a cut for too long. If in doubt, the F-B focus, adjust it with the Tap In and the panel. Mine didn't have these problems, in case there's a solution. Ps.: except Nikon and Canon, who have very high quality control (but also to them something runs away), the bright lenses, can suffer from front and back focus. I'm going to over-recommend it. sent on June 18, 2020 |
 | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: Unbeatable quality price, good color yield, overall quality. Cons: Not tropicalized (at that price?), slight loss on the edges, flare to handle Opinion: The lens would have marketed even with 200 euros more list. He deserves them all and even more. I used it for reportage, landscapes and interiors and I can only be satisfied. I matched a dedicated Ring Haida and 3 slab filters, to get better results in some situations. In the reportage you have to pay attention to the backlights and side sources, which could leave halos of light on the shot. The lens is very protruding and feels the light from the sides, despite the built-in lampshade. Convenient if spartan, switching from af to manual, pulling the lens back. It works, so it's fine, I'm interested in lenses and less aesthetic solutions ema more functional. 16-28 covers a good angle, there are those who do better with 15-30 but you have to put the rest on it. The combination with the slab filters, of high quality, has given me good satisfaction in the past. Slow that I definitely recommend, solid as a grenade. It weighs, but there are few lenses that do not weigh and if we do not talk about 500mm sincerely I do not see a problem, in the bag or with the strap on the side: problem solved ;-) Slow fire problems? The lens for sporty use, is connected remotely (otherwise you stand on the hood when they pass). By hand, in broad daylight, problems do not give. At 16 or 28 mm the fire catches it in a fraction, and the engine does not go back and forth sent on June 18, 2020 |
 | Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Macro Pros: Definition, focal length, solidity Cons: Unsealed, coating that retains marks and stains with ease Opinion: Macro specific lens, with a 99% manual use and diframed up and over F16. It holds the flare well and has a good lens hood. My version is completely controlled by the engine of the machine, both the diaphragm and the fire. It has no stabilization but I would not put it between the desired being born to stand on tripod, remote shutter, raised mirror and low ISO. The AF is slow but not important in this lens. The lining could be done better. Wrinkled, it retains many impurities and is easily stained with rain. As far as I know, the lens is not sealed, a feature that would have made it go up again in positive reviews. Used a deal, new much less, after 150 you get to 180 and 200 except the 3.5 have really high prices. Excellent purchase, highly recommended. sent on December 18, 2018 |
 | Zeiss Jena Triotar 135mm f/4 Pros: Cheap, beautiful colors, cookie triplet, 15 lamella, almost no falling to the edges, the beauty of the aluminum Cons: Adjustable diaphragm in the head, fire from very long racing, attention to the dust that can hurt in the machine attachment Opinion: Cooke Triple, 15-lobed diaphragm, a post-war lens that still says its, by character and quality. The scheme is as simple as it is, as it should be for an affordable lens. It's always a Carl Zeiss and you see! The colors are not off but well-balanced, giving them beautiful shades. Slightly soft at F4, but still usable anyway. Aluminum frame, where scratches and small shots are noticed but from the unmistakable character that few lenses can boast. RnThe focus is not one of the easiest but the one who has practice will not be in trouble. The diaphragm adjustment position remains peculiar ... it's almost like the hood latch! It slaps a bit when you have to work precision, Nikon specially, for the confirmation of fire. The back of the lens is half empty, leaving too much dust. As soon as it is taken, the cap is immediately put and the problem is resolved. There are two models: pre war and post war, the slimmest pre(My) most robust.rn Normal and T * red colors with the most appetizing seocnda.rnAlluminous or not the lens is good solid, some specimens may have sharp focus and diaphragms, just make it a small breakthrough from who you want it and The problem is resolved.rnrnA I like a lot, so much that repays even the position of the diamant and the length of more than a lap for the fuchsia.rnTry on the portraits and on each set, less suited to instinctive shots, for obvious reasons .. .rnrn As much as it should cost 3 times, and if I do not mind the market, it will be a lens that will rise in price like the Trioplan. sent on May 26, 2017 |
 | Zenit MC Helios-81H 50mm f/2 Pros: Bokeh spiral, a classic of the series. Nikon Attack with infinite fire. Small to carry in your pocket. Price and character. Cons: A lens with its limitations and distortions, deciding between shadows and lights a bit nervous. Opinion: I do not see the limit completely manual, it is certainly not a slow-moving lens, but one of the ones with which the composite is sought, the light. It induces to reflect on what you are doing, selecting shots and adjustments. But it should always be like this Nikon Native native that allows you to have that vintage touch on the most popular brands, due to the higher drawer.rnMultiple detachment, hardness, character, for those shots that deserve it. A lens should always be there. We are not talking about a studio lens, detail and precision, to forget, even focusing on 100% fire has fringing and more with lights in the foreground. By contrast, it is well-behaved, it does not improve enormously by closing, in fact, it loses its special effects. If you want to give a vintage tone and spend 60 to 80 euros for about fifty you can stay. There are discreet lenses and other new handsets, those do not pay 35 euros. Compared to other manual and vintage lenses, it's very easy to use. sent on April 30, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR Pros: vr incredible, fixed aperture 200 to 500, very competitvo price. Sharp, sports mode for panning. Cons: The bag could seem something more useful Opinion: 200 to 500 becomes useful for sports, reportage and even birds which needs a doubler at least 1.4 for the full formato.rnNon think there are optical level and price that can compete, to go nettamante addition, there are fixed, with specificity of use and prices even comparabili.rnIl VR allows you to take the flight, the rest is up to the engine of the lens and not least to that of the camera body. On Dx gains that x1.5 that fills some gaps focal length. It has a more versatile use of only the use of the shed and tripod, you may very well leave without. rnDi contrast, many birds flee or allontanao, requiring longer focal lunghe.rnA 200 can also make good pictures, with a nice blurred. It lacks definition. A lens to be worn with the cintuta the shoulder reflex, certainly not to collo.rnIl lens hood is not so difficie to assemble, just see the points and turn, also very useful to keep the dust off and riflessi.rnA all across where it requires a minimum of practice or a support, especially after a busy day of Look-ion. rnRimane always a balanced lens with a very attractive price. sent on April 08, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 105mm f/2 D DC Pros: defocus, good even at room temperature, built-in hood, excellent portrait lens, solidity. Cons: It requires practice defocus but is used well without. Opinion: With 135 are the only lenses that allows to fade back and forth to soggetto.rnMeglio close the iris with defocus to keep incisività.rnForse a bit long as the focus on portrait, a 85 would be better but having used not rimpiango.rnSolido and well fact, used to be a bargain. A little slow happen in my opinion. sent on June 29, 2016 |
 | Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Bokeh, high definition also to TA, precise and cutting down of 2-3 stops Cons: none Opinion: One of my favorite lenses. It must be proven, suddenly everything becomes clear, clean. It makes it very well in the first stop from TA and it's great for a portrait set, which captures the details and create a blurred progressive lenses that only very bright, quality can give. Rivals the latest additions in terms of precision. Strictly by hand, I would have used in the manual even if it had autofocus. Bokeh typical and very pleasant. It has its years but flows both fire that diaphragms without obstinate. A lens as it should. sent on June 16, 2015 |
 | Meyer Gorlitz Orestor 135mm f/ 2.8 Pros: vintage character to sell with double yield: open for bokeh and sharp closed. Colors other than modern lenses. is posed by a lens that can give an atmosphere that new freshmen have not. Cons: to fully open is not easy to take. It 'easy cannare fire even with a pair of stop closed. Should do fork and some shots calibration. Will never fire to infinity. The adapters are of two types: with or without lens. With the lens focus to infinity but has lost the characteristics of fuzzy, then, without lens adapter and not infinite but it's worth it. Opinion: Should close a couple of stops to make fire right and then move to fully open. Deceives ... rnAnche with two stops under the effects you have. Much depends on the difference between the background and the subject for them. Be sought backlighting with that which reserve on the lenses of this tipo.rnE 'a lens that is to be known and appreciated. All open and 2.8 means that you work a lot of times and iso if not the bleached are frequenti.rnLa beauty is to see in the viewfinder accuracy of fire increases with the closing, and the decrease is less luminosità.rnL'effetto violent Trioplan.rnLente be laid. rnMi love it. sent on April 27, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
