|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Zorkmaster www.juzaphoto.com/p/Zorkmaster  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X100T Pros: all Cons: nothing Opinion: the excellence of the compact, at the levels of the older sisters as a quality but in a pocket body, to have absolutely. I've had other compacts, even nice Panasonic, but nothing of this level of colors and customizations. The battery is in line with the lightweight body although very robust. Nothing to say, a real gem. sent on August 10, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-PRO3 Pros: style style and style Cons: not for everyone Opinion: I already have the little sister X100T that I'm in love with... and then I took the step. Light and qualitative for sure, but... it is still an ASPC, not suitable for birdlife and therefore they are the only problem of the small sensor. It would be perfect if it was FF. So it is a nice object to use every now and then but with similar results to the X100T. sent on August 10, 2022 |
 | Canon EOS RP Pros: autofocus, lightness, compatible ef optics Cons: I would say nothing Opinion: I've had this car for a few days. I come from different FF experiences, from Nikon d800 to sony a7rII,... Canon for me was now the choice, I just gave up a 1D mkIV to return to a 7d mkII to do sports and birdlife. At this point no longer having an FF for landscapes and portraits I chose this one. And it churns out great files, with great colors and easy to handle in PP! The battery defect? well, if you put the standby a few seconds ago you have the day and putting a spare battery in your bag is cheap... lightness has its compromises. Last thing, I have big hands and therefore I use it with the handle, even with heavy optics I have no problems. Beware of the choice of the EF adapter, I have the Viltrox but it sucks and dances already, now I take the canon. sent on August 10, 2022 |
 | Panasonic Lumix LX100 Pros: light, compact, fits in your pocket, sensor, mpx ideal, dynamic range, Leica lens Cons: I have to think... Opinion: Taken by chance as a replacement for the Olympus OMD 10 II and to support it with my kit nikon d800 and ... amazed. In many situations bring this or the top kit does not make any difference ... even sometimes in extreme situations in the mountains with this picture I take them anyway at home.rnEven the battery lasts to be a compact high performance, if you turn it off it's about 300 shots. rnDifficult to find something similar, mirrorless shakes! sent on January 30, 2018 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: lightweight, 2.8 Fixed and usable Cons: material, with canon sometimes contact problems Opinion: I took this lens the wake of DxO excellent data on the coupling that would have done with my canon 5D mkII. I must say that I am satisfied and I'll explain why: rn- if I spend so little of course the lens is to fight, so I would not expect plastics and eccellentirn- equipment I want to surrender, and this is clear when you need it, with a great bokeh, luminosissimorn- I wish I could take back to the mountains or the woods, so it must be lightweight, and this èrnUnico very little forgivable flaw is that sometimes tells me that the contacts do not or are dirty, this is unacceptable since I have a 5D and not a camera nicchia.rnIl cmq result is much higher than the canon 24-105 of kit that I had before. sent on November 02, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: price, image quality, sharpness up to 300mm Cons: for the price no one, I would say the focus ring that moves and which therefore must not touch Opinion: I think it's time to stop to appreciate a lens just because a thousand Euros. I read that is not sharp or loses to 300mm ?? https://youpic.com/image/8609244/ crap ... even in this picture in a condition quite outside what should be his work (a tele is certainly not a lens to make close up of a flower ) with the minimum aperture (so a PDC anything) at full extension (300mm), the result is excellent. I would like to see what makes the most emblazoned L apart from costing 3 times ... rnmeditate people meditate ... sent on August 11, 2016 |
 | Sony A7 Pros: FF, small, dirty sensor is hardly Cons: optical decent dear, noisy, slow Opinion: I had this FF for almost a year, I came from ASP-C SLR media and all at once I was catapulted into the magical world of optical range vintage which admittedly have given me a lot of fun. Then I bought the optics kit and found unspeakable ... a sbocchevole slowness. And in the end to have a FF to use the vintage goes well for a while 'but then it breaks. I am so back to my first love, the micro 4/3 ... and for me it is another story. sent on March 08, 2016 |
 | Samyang 500mm f/6.3 MC IF Pros: cost, weight, compactness, quality of the material Cons: difficulty of use in general Opinion: Also I have bought this lens with medium demands knowing potentially do something stupid. Also I have changed my mind after a trip to the mountains, then in complex environment and without a tripod monopod it. The brightness 6.3 lets you shoot at ISO 400 with a time of 1/600 in full sun (nikon D60). Sure dusk starts to become difficult to work freehand, but a tripod can solve problems. Superb in photographs of the moon, yield is exceptional even compared to nikon 300.rnIn final working a lot to learn but when you understand how it works you can photograph a helicopter in flight freehand without the ciccare focus.rnLo advice but I would not take never a catadriottico F8 sent on October 02, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
