|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Abaritte www.juzaphoto.com/p/Abaritte  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Small, lightweight, excellent construction, focus ring extremely fluid, crystal clear, beautiful colors, very good quality of the bokeh Cons: 2.8, vignetting vistosissima on APS-C at maximum aperture (f4 is already almost completely disappeared), a trickle of AC magenta Opinion: Lens OUTSTANDING !! quality stands out, great! already perfectly clear to the center to 2.8 (the edge is not too sharp but defends himself very well) if you close one or two stop becomes a blade! the problem is the usability, I mean, on APS-C becomes a 63mm, focal really unhelpful and because of that, in spite of himself, this lens is often in the bag ... unfortunately the opening "only" 2.8 I often pushing to replace the 24-105 f4 so I decided to change it for the next 50mm 1.8 STM. Unfortunately I came to the conclusion that for a fixed (not as may be the 200mm tele) 2.8 is too little, it takes at least a 2.0, or rather more open yet! I'm really sorry because, I repeat, this 40mm lens is a very high quality ... sent on May 14, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Lightweight and compact, good sharpness, tremendous value for money Cons: For what it costs nothing; perhaps the diameter of 67mm filters, which forced me to spend the onerous amount of 5 euro for a step-up adapter to mount 77mm filters that I own;) Opinion: It 'a lens in its price class, it would seem, judging by the price ... in fact, what a surprise !! I was doubtful whether to buy this for my 60D, or the 10-22 and at the end I did definitely the right choice! is sharp enough, to 10mm stopping down does not buy much in sharpness, but already zooming and closing, it becomes clearer. about precisely the diaphragm I would not write that it is "dark" because I do not use it practically never under f5.6 / 8.0! using it for landscapes or tight places do not feel the need for a 2.8, for example, if you want a lens for night you take a drive! Be careful though, this toy is stabilized! I happen to shoot streams and make them silky even freehand (stabilizer, I swear, it's so quiet that I thought would work: I had to lock me in a room and pull the ear objective to verify a slight noise! ??Incredible !). construction palsticosa seems at first glance but usandol does not give this feeling, the collars are perfect and overall you hold well. fast and accurate autofocus (as the stabilizer, I thought was wrong because it does not feel at all). distortion really contained! resistance to flare quite good. what else to say, little chromatic aberration, visible only in hard as branches exposed to the sun or metal parts. for those who are undecided, as I was, between this and eventually the 10-22 or other wide of third homes say you buy this! spend little and you take home a lens of 2014, stabilized (which can always serve), with AC and less clear as much as others (not think 10-22 is sharper, the maximum are the same)! ah, I forgot, it focuses on the distance of an index finger - the long - allowing the subject to give free rein to creativity! sent on May 13, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Very solid construction and weather sealing; zoom and focus rings pleasant; autofocus very fast, quiet and precise; weight; Focal Range unparalleled! Cons: The real truth is against chromatic aberration, a problem also typical sensor aps-c Opinion: I own this light for a few months and after having tested it well I would like to express its opinion is an excellent optical altogether, if you think that the use boundless they can do. The use of 60D but I tried it on FF, apart from the obvious loss of wide angle on aps-c compensates reaching 170mm (more than enough for me) with a good overall sharpness, loses a bit 'over the edge the 70mm but the center remains quite sharp even at f4, if you close one stop already becomes sharper (on ff, of course, the sharpness is much higher). The colors are quite good and faithful, quite good management of the flare. Good stabilizer, does his duty. On aps-c problems as vignetting and distortion I've almost never heard, when active correction profile pp changes very little in the image, only when the photos are vertical or horizontal lines to the extreme sides you see a little ' improvement but really these two defects are not a problem. As I wrote the truth is against the ac, very present(But that goes away just as easily in pp) sometimes even in the middle. Overall it is the perspective that I always use, constant and does not disappoint! for wide-angle, on aps-c, the best solution is to accompany it with an ef-s low price (eg canon 10-18 IS) so as to be covered from one end to a very good 16mm tele 170mm with only two lenses! Ah, tropical conditions and excellent construction;) !! sent on February 08, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
