|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Archon www.juzaphoto.com/p/Archon ![]() |
![]() | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Pros: Stabilizer, professional optics, construction, quality! Cons: not harmonic for a compact system, difficulty of integration with the light system proposed by fuji. Opinion: We have always read a great good on this view, well, it's all true, but unfortunately the thing that does not make it so popular is the difficulty of accepting this format for the small Fuji, in short if you have a kit optics, or a small fixed, you feel free, light, you want to bring the room in every place and in every way, often shots between people and you have the ease of a smartphone, do not give great stimuli in people around you, nor between subjects framed, well mounting this canvas forgotten the imprint that many made to choose the comfort of the mirrorless ... rnMontato the cannon 2.8 the crowds are frightened the subjects if not treated properly stiffen, and our neck gets tired, even the ' grip remains uncomfortable and poorly balanced, not to mention who is used to shoot from the display. The return to the usual ocular is almost obligatory.rnInsomma for those who have made the leap of living easy, it is a dip in the past.rnCerto then seeing the final result we are motivated for all the diffipast cures! Compared to Kit, adds poetry with every click, it is difficult to make mistakes even in difficult situations, enchantingly positioned the camera to the eye you forget the difficulties and you take taste ... rnSensation that the very high-performance autofocus consumes more battery compared to other objectives ... rnGuestation?!? Difficult to accept compromises in quality and systems, perhaps for these focal lengths are still more appropriate SLRs, although honestly this is the best zoom ever built for APS-C systems! RnI recommend an evaluation before purchase, but if you decide to take it , then you have overcome all the inertia said and will be sure love. You would not say but I love it! Rn sent on March 23, 2018 |
![]() | Nikon D800 Pros: Autofocus ... the best I've ever tried !!! Solidity, many Mpx, dynamic range rocking, excellent construction and management of vibration fantastic (hard to notice the shake-even with huge files), ISO 100 sensational, real images, soft and full of detail !!! Cons: Balance with optical long burst just acceptable, not phenomenally high ISO, but if you elabbora and decreases a bit 'the file, perhaps better than the competition ... Problems chromatic increasing the ISO. Software too elaborate, too many settings lights and shadows, which often slow down the ideas of the photographer, but certainly the larger part like! Opinion: I state that I come from analog to switch to Nikon and Canon Digital after the poor performance of the 5D MKII I got this fantastisca NIKON.rnErgonomia software and slightly less than the Japanese competitor, but as devastating yield of the final product. I imagine that photographers first coat might be confused with the veterans, thanks to the quality and resounding Autofocus, exceptional in every situazione.rnCorpo machine solid, but too many buttons you often have to take his eyes from the viewfinder to understand what you want to press, the Canon is better as management operativa.rnOltre to MAF already mentioned I would like to enhance the validity of the shutter, which has a tight sound and pleasant and hardly startles the body, helping to capture crisp and firm even at times lenti.rnNeo Nikon is the sharp devaluation entering bodies too similar to each other with continuous improvements, so if you are on the air every year, you can change the body, but if there is content (and believe me it will not be disappointed) you can appreciate every shot fantastic and remain present in the finished product forseveral anni.rnCONSIGLIATISSIMA sent on November 26, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me