|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Scubaman50 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Scubaman50  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D750 Pros: high ISO, atofocus held Cons: loud shutter, tropicalization nonexistent due to the tilting screen, shortness 8000 '; Ocular unclosable except with the cap. Opinion: The D750 is born unlucky, with fewer than 2 calls from Nikon, which meant I had to wait more than one year and to take it to go to the store with the tablet to check the serial on the nikon site to prevent it were part of a game lacked. Tropicalization? But if the booklet is written to avoid it dry contact that connects the display to the body! For the rest is a good car, but compared to the D610, the better I see a more responsive autofocus, with 51 points still always too distributed in the center, at least without any cut, and a better seal algi high iso; also with battery grip, which nikon always sells more expensive, it improves tilt. sent on February 27, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: focal range, sharpness, vr, minimum distance of focus Cons: weight, cost, hood that gives the idea of ??fragility Opinion: I bought this obj for travel, and flanked by a 10 to 24 on D7100, it allows me to have a full range of focal. Very satisfied incisiveness, also higher than the 70-300 vr, the fundamental drawback to this is that obj is a true 300mm if's focused at infinity, so that in spite of the exif always say 300 mm, less than 1 focheggiando mt, equivalent to about a 135 mm sent on September 18, 2015 |
 | Nikon Coolpix S2800 Pros: Price, photo quality, battery life, Cons: Optical excursion perhaps a little limited, no manual exposure control, noisy at high ISO. Opinion: possessor of four SLR (D50, D80, D7100, D610) I bought this camera in combination with a sub scafandratura Nimar. I was impressed by the quality of the picture, whereas the sensor is very small; Unfortunately the amount of Mpix. It produces considerable noise already at 400 iso. It lacks the manual exposure control, and perhaps a greater range of focal would not spoiled. However the price of the camera alone is negligible. sent on July 31, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness, tropicalization Cons: lack vr; minimum distance MAF; cost slightly excessive. Opinion: A pity that this lack of objective vr, also because it is used by me on a DX format, which leads him to almost 128mm, forcing to raise the ISO to shoot at an appropriate time; fast focus; good sharpness, chroma, blurred. I hope I can try it as soon as possible on FF: what we read should give you great satisfaction! sent on October 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon Coolpix P520 Pros: weight, excellent stabilized zoom, battery life, gust Cons: no raw, no filters, inability to control external flash, zoom a little slow, electronic viewfinder Opinion: It 'an excellent machine at the optical layer, the weight is negligible and every time I use the camera with a set of at least 2 optical zoom, the regret! Perhaps the major limitation is that of not being able to mount filters. In the film loses focus as you zoom in, and the electronic viewfinder is quite useless (and also makes the eyes water) sent on September 07, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
