|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Borzip www.juzaphoto.com/p/Borzip  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: A tank! Cons: The limited isos Opinion: A war machine. As soon as you pick it up, you can feel the sturdiness. Used with fast lenses (f1.8 and f2.8) it is exceptional. When you're using it indoors with lenses like 17-40 f.4 L, you need the help of the flash. At iso above 2000 the photographs are noisy. However, it remains, despite today's current technology, a very good product. I gave it away because my type of photography needs to work at high iso given the environments with low light and the use without a tripod. I upgraded to the next version just for these reasons, because otherwise it's a great machine. sent on November 18, 2023 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Excellent yield Cons: I am not convinced by the stabilizer Opinion: I took it in November, used it because it was new to rib a bit. I took about a thousand shots and some photographs are spectacular! The painful notes: while I was doing a service for a baptism he started to make a strange noise and I realized that it was the stabilizer. I basically took pictures without the stabilizer working. For thefts to I had left the two-year warranty and now is in service. I thank Rce foto for the friendliness and professionalism. I will have to wait about twenty days. sent on May 07, 2022 |
 | Canon 20D Pros: Robustness, precision, indestructible. Cons: Small display. Opinion: My first reflex, I bought in 2008, now 170,000 shots. When you pick up you have the feeling of having a robust SLR. The sensor, as the software is outdated, but its only (you have to say) 8.2 megapixels do not regret the newer models. A real gem! RnSe you make numerical comparisons with the latest sensors aps-c can not compete, but the yield is very high. Compared to the 30D and 40D, the sensor is less noisy to 1600 ISO, sensitivity maximum recommended on this machine, although expandable up to 3200. The targets use with L series and the combination is perfect. After so many years I think still a very valid machine! RnPreciso that is not the only body I have, but I consider it really battle, a body that will never leave you! (Chip shutter failure do us part ...!) sent on January 16, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Quality color, sharpness, robustness, precision. Cons: A bit 'distortion to 17mm Opinion: I bought used about six months ago and gave me a lot of satisfaction. the results are very good. Very accurate even in low light situations. It 'true that it is a 4, but used with appropriate caution not disappoint you. I suggest buying this lens for the strength. As is well known is a series L, then the TOP for canon. The only minor flaw is a slight distortion at 17mm, but nothing preoccupante.rn sent on July 06, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Brightness, blur / Boken, performance, sharpness, quality construction and so on and so forth. Cons: Hood not included. Opinion: It 'a great lens, superb quality! RNLA quality of both the materials of the images is eccellente.rnL'autofocus is very precise and does not miss a colpo.rnL'unico defect is that of aps-c becomes (let pass the term ) a bit 'long! rnL'ho sold last week for three reasons: rn1- I used the little, although it is a lens that gave me strong emotions; rn2- I had problems because I multiplication factor cameras APS-C; rn3- I hate to say it, but I had to switch to monetize objectives set L. sent on February 16, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Brightness, Defocused, weight and price! Cons: Focus noisy and not always accurate, focus ring uncomfortable and especially too much plastic. Opinion: I recently purchased and all in all, the price is giusto.rnL'ho tried on 50D and I did tests that confirm what a little 'described by his tutti.rnIl "STRONG", if we can define it and its plastic ... rn ... too much plastic, the bayonet well ... rnL'ho tried in low light conditions and not 1.8 as the best. I noticed that at 2.8 on the maximum! rnHo noted that the focus is not always accurate, as well as noisy ... rn ... in fact, since it is not USM motor is notable, indeed sentire.rnNonostante these defects is a perspective that I recommend first of all for the price: € .100,00 new rncon less than what we find on the market? rnPoi low brightness goes to his advantage! sent on February 16, 2015 |
 | Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Pros: is a handyman! Good stabilizer. Cons: Dark, focus noisy and not precise. Opinion: I bought this lens aware of little brightness 3.5-6.3, but is aware that a handyman! RnQuando are on vacation I take him aware not to take pictures in low light situations, but I have a responsibility to get behind goals expensive series L.rnProprio because when I'm on vacation I want to be more carefree I combined with an old 20D, which all in all 8 megapixels for a holiday or for any private photographs that goes bene.rnOvviamente for demanding photo shoot outside the FF and L series that are definitely another level. sent on February 08, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 80-200mm f/2.8 L Pros: Beautiful colors, the blur is excellent, very sturdy (no plastic). Cons: the weight falls within its category, given the robustness. If I wanted to get more used to buy a 70-200 2.8 is 2. Opinion: I bought some a week ago, obviously used and until now I have not had any negative note. Given the cost paid € .450,00 I think I did a good spesa.rnSe had available more money I would buy a different type one mentioned in the cons. rna part of the economic discourse (quality / price), is a lens that is giving me a lot of satisfaction. I hope as soon as possible to post some pictures. sent on September 06, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
