JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD is a superzoom lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2008 to 2010 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 450 €;
11 users have given it an average vote of 8.2 out of 10.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 206000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Great everything to do, from wide angle to canvases, all in a backpack.
Cons:It's a little dark, but for what he does, it's... the VC is a bit noisy but I got used to...
Opinion:I have this lens since 2011 and I have to say that I made him at least 20,000 photos, 95% are all OK the rest 5% are wrong photos because of me and the lens... The wrap-wrapped focus is not precise, making two three photos per subject 2 out of three are always good, if not three out of three, every now and then it is wrong... And it simply takes, and a whole do that has solved so many Excursions, you need a lot of light to have good results. During the day you have a lot of fun you always have all the Focals available, and I after the PP I always brought home good results.... In the evening and better to carry the trepiede if you want to shoot over 150 mm. below 150 mm. and you can still shoot freehand... If you photograph in the evening in the premises, a flash and useful his photo machine is great but over 24 mm. So with the Flash and great at all focal points, but from 24 mm. onward... Without exaggeration you can not expect knockout photos, but basically take pictures that for a non-professional photographer can be satisfied, now given his Age in the used you find it little, and for those who start life as a photographer and want to spend little I recommend it , it is better to take it and have fun for many years.... A big greeting to everyone... (MGNELLO)
Cons:A little 'dark, loses definition above 200 mm; derives Zoom in the absence of the block.
Opinion:On the way you avoid changing constantly goal, a real tuttofare.rnNon and 'true that sucks like quality because in the tests more' severe proved on average exceeds its objectives in both Nikon kit that Canon.rnHo found annoying drift Zoom ( stretches when and 'downwards without block activated) while I never had problems there' speed it 'precision in focus that, combined with my Nikon D7100 - never sbagliato.rnE' obvious that there is comparison with lenses of higher level where the difference in quality and 'notevole.rnrn
Opinion:I bought this lens aware of little brightness 3.5-6.3, but is aware that a handyman! RnQuando are on vacation I take him aware not to take pictures in low light situations, but I have a responsibility to get behind goals expensive series L.rnProprio because when I'm on vacation I want to be more carefree I combined with an old 20D, which all in all 8 megapixels for a holiday or for any private photographs that goes bene.rnOvviamente for demanding photo shoot outside the FF and L series that are definitely another level.
Opinion:it was my first lens when I started, and not having so many claims, I thought it was spectacular ..... did everything. rnPoi of course it goes on you grow, and you realize that the quality is not at best a bit dark ... etc. Conclusion, on a beautiful day, in a picnic with friends, you're more free, and also satisfaction, but do not go beyond.
Opinion:If you want to carry around a single lens, or you want to get a result at 270 firm without necessarily spending money on a 300af-s, this is the right lens, a little flaw in focusing slow and noisy. Personally I preferred the lens cole younger USD because the lenses are of better quality and give more vivid picture, which I like more. Ideal as a lens to shoot in good light.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
