JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
If you want, you can even enable or disable specific cookies on the page Cookies Preferences.
The Canon EF 80-200mm f/2.8 L is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1989 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 650 €;
11 users have given it an average vote of 8.8 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 212000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Nitidezza su tutta l' escursione focale, colori e bokeh
Cons: messa a fuoco a 1,9m e un pò lenta per gli standard attuali
Opinion: Comperato ad un prezzo da affare, lo possiedo ormai da 5 anni convivendo col terrore che si rompa e non possa più aggiustarlo. Ottica che se non altro per la sua distanza di messa a fuoco lunga e per il limite di f 2,8 che in alcuni ritratti è troppo chiuso, sostituirebbe tutta la linea medio-tele del mio corredo. Autofocus, leggermente lento ed un pò più rumoroso degli USM , non sbaglia un colpo.La resa dell' incarnato dei soggetti è uguale a quella delle migliori lenti per ritratto di casa Canon. Sono tentato di comperane un altro per eventualmente ovviare per i pezzi di ricambio.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Superb lens, in film even better, with digital less because of scarce machines certainly not for the lens. Professional optics.
Cons:The way no one was conceived. In my view, this is not the way to go. Not tropicalized, but then maybe it wasn't used..
Opinion:I have been using it for years and I always find it satisfying. Engine not ultrasonic, but fast and precise. Metal and glass. Price on the market for a 2.8 is worth them all. Heavy but unfortunately this is the pledge for a focal with this opening. Beautiful colors, neutral. A little noisy, at least mine, but it's always been like this from the beginning. At the current price it must be taken. Super sharpness at every focal and opening.
Pros:The result of the photo is beautiful. Sharpness and overall quality are really good. It's a great product.
Cons:A little weighted if you carry it around for a few hours, on the other hand it gives beautiful results.
Opinion:I have been keeping this view for about twenty years, a great companion of travel. I bought it in lire, used it. He took excellent photos, always. I pray that it does not break. The equipment of the fastening ring on an easel is appreciable. This lens has always had positive comments from numerous photographers from all over the world ... they're not wrong.
Pros:sharpness to 2.8 superbi.Costruzione tonal passages from "real" red line, all metal pieno.Non is white!
Cons:weight but it is the construction guarantee top
Opinion:wonderful goal, crisp already 2.8.Nero and with red line! all metal, but it is beautiful as it weighs performante.Ideale for portraits where he does not regret a fixed focal hand, amop. A fortune today find a copy in good condition, if the opportunity arose not lasciatevela sfuggire.Io I was very lucky, finding it in sublime condition, with its original box, hood and short .... "shopping", even if these conditions are paid ...
Pros:Beautiful colors, the blur is excellent, very sturdy (no plastic).
Cons:the weight falls within its category, given the robustness. If I wanted to get more used to buy a 70-200 2.8 is 2.
Opinion:I bought some a week ago, obviously used and until now I have not had any negative note. Given the cost paid € .450,00 I think I did a good spesa.rnSe had available more money I would buy a different type one mentioned in the cons. rna part of the economic discourse (quality / price), is a lens that is giving me a lot of satisfaction. I hope as soon as possible to post some pictures.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
