|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Morice www.juzaphoto.com/p/Morice  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-T4 Pros: Sensor, autonomy, AF, IQ, JPG, noise signal performance, stabilization (definitely the video part) Cons: dedicated battery, Opinion: I have the impression that this XT-4 is a complete camera perhaps the best APS-C on the market (Year 2020) excellent AF excellent autonomy (compared to the previous) very good signal-noise management, excellent JPG ready in the car, only sore note the dedicated battery, for those who arrive as but from the world fuji (X100F, XT-2) the "old" batteries you can not use anymore. For the rest everything a step up the XT-3 and something more than a step for the XT-2. The video part I do not use so I can not judge (but others say that it is very performing) sent on July 16, 2020 |
 | Sigma 14mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical HSM Pros: AF, angle of field, construction, quality, distortion control, 7-blade diaphragm .... Cons: Flare, weight, front lens, fixed hood little protective filters only to jelly ... (Discontinued) Opinion: Great lens for FF or APS-C (which grow to about 22mm) if you have a good specimen as my otimo is already f/2.8 chudendo even remote corners recover the gap with the center. Beware of the Flare always lurking, AC is present but manageable in PP Sigma has stopped producing it (who knows why?) Definitely a good alternative to the Canon EF 14/2.8L II. You can find it at a reasonable cost. sent on June 29, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Color, contrast, diframma f/2.8, Bokeh, Flare, Tropicalization, Sharpness, keeping the market Cons: variability of the specimens, weight, cost, vignetting, distortion Opinion: I had this lens along with his brother 24-105L which I then held. The lens has excellent colors, good contrast, good / excellent sharpness at room temperature (but varies from specimen to specimen) very good resistance to flare, cartoon f/2.8 but correctable as distortion, excellent bokeh, he also has the suio difettucci, that are the weight, the cost, and the variability of the specimens (not up to the L series). Consider whether you need an f/2.8 lens and a zoom 24-70 or the 24-105L could do for you ... sent on September 28, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Colors, f / 4 constant, sealed, AF, Construction, Sharpness Cons: Vignetting, distortion, AC Opinion: I had this lens for a long time on both of 5d 5d2. It has an excellent yield (at least my copy) from edge to edge already at f / 4 produces detailed images and high-contrast, strong backlighting produces AC easily corrected in PP. Distorts to 17mm (but always correctable PP) has a range of focal interesting, a fast and accurate AF. I changed to a 16-35L II (blatantly was wrong) a perfect match with the FF or too pushed it too long ... Its range of use ideal f/5.6 - f/11 sent on September 28, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: f/2.8, colors, contrast Cons: Cost, Distortion, Filter diameter, 35mm Yield Opinion: My view on this lens is "poor" for a number of reasons: Distortion at 16mm is unworthy (considering what he has accomplished sigma 12mm) L-series resistance have little flare of Your Best to the version that was bad. The yield to 35mm is far below expectations (better to have an EF 35 f / 2) has a brightness interesting for certain types of photography (but getting better closing of a stop) the colors and contrast are not discussed. Costs twice as much of the baby 17-40L but in my opinion not worth it, need filters (82mmm) slim expensive and usually prone to trigger and Flare "ghost image" if they are of excellent quality. Council to consider the need for good f/2.8 before investing 1200 euros. sent on September 28, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Sharpness, AF, Colors, Flare resistance, light weight, Filters 58mm Cons: Lack of the hood as standard Opinion: I have a good copy, already clear at TA FF has a good bokeh maybe not up to the competition (which, however, suffers from other problems) and brother f/1.2 L but I remember that it costs 1/4 less, for rest is a great lens may be a little dated, gives me great images even in low light. Closing up to f/1.8, it becomes a razor incredible, at a cost acceptable uses 58mm filters (less expensive than 77mm) AF accurately and quickly. sent on September 28, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Sharpness, size, weight, AF, colors, price / performance Cons: AC, no lens hood as standard Opinion: It 's the lens I use the most on FF for portraits settled, gives very sharp images already at room temperature (f/1.8) has a good Bokeh, has a fast and accurate AF (also suitable for action shots) great colors , is relatively cheap (compared to competition) AC manageable in post-production. A lens with price / performance unbeatable, if a more substantial budget the EF 85 f/1.2 L is the maximum for the portrait (focus AF). sent on September 26, 2011 |
 | Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM Pros: Distortion, Angle, sharpness Cons: Size, no screw-on filters, variability of the specimens, brightness Opinion: I've had five of the last 12-24 seems to be going pretty well (from corner to corner) on 5d2 produces incredible images, it is not easy to "manage" it may be much closer to the subject to be photographed, to be used mainly by f / 8 f/11 (preferably with a tripod in "bubble"), after which offers breathtaking images, you can use the filters in gelatin filter holder in the rear, the AF is accurate, not lightning, but precise, AC correctable in post- production, there is nothing more wide (linear) for Canon ... My go so well I sold the 16-35L II ... sent on September 26, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 Pros: Compact, Light, Bright, Sharp, economic Cons: AF dated, but precise, AC Opinion: THE EF 24 f/2.8 lens is a little "evaluated" by most, good wide angle for FF quite bright (f/2.8) considered the cost and what can rstituire in terms of image quality already at room temperature, I would say very much fine. Great colors, slight vignetting at f/2.8 and corrected the Post-Production, little distortion for those who can not afford the brother EF 24 f/1.4 L II, this is a great glass ... sent on September 26, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Af/2.0 sharpness, lightness, compactness, cost Cons: AF, CA Opinion: I've had it for some time and then 5d2 5d on a lens really amazing quality and lightweight, produces excellent photos already af/2.0 and chidendo is one or two stops reaches its climax as image quality. AF has a first-generation and somewhat noisy, but precise, suffers from chromatic aberration TA (manageable place in Production). I would recommend this lens on FF to try to use a handyman before passing it to his brother 35L. sent on September 26, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
