|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giordano52 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giordano52  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5Ds R Pros: Image Quality at 360 °... Good even at 1600/2000 ISO, but up to 1200 the rendering of the images is unbeatable in every point of view... machinability files... Sturdy body and "for me" ergonomic to perfection. Cons: If You use the monitor very little battery autonomy. For me no but maybe for some the burst limited to 5 fps. Heavy Files, it takes a good PC. Opinion: I waited quite a while before reviewing the Canon 5DSR, I wanted to be certain of what I thought and wrote... I do not review the video part because I do not care, I never do. I have been holding and using it for over a year, I took it on the advice of a friend who still owns it, I admit that after a few tests, at first glance I thought I had made a "cavolata"... At the beginning (about a month) there was some difficulty in managing it, but when I went into tune, and after doing (personally) all the settings on the camera combined with the optics I had the pleasure of enjoying all the merits. Reflex particular but rich in content, especially those related to the potential/quality of the image rendered.... Obviously the files are "Pesantucci", it takes a good processor in the PC. Who thinks is a reflex only for a few photographic uses as landscape or studio wrong, it is not so... I do mostly naturalistic, and I can say that it is the best SLR I have owned for that purpose,.. It takes away so many chestnuts from the fire, es: I can crop to 100/150x100 without loss of quality, also have a perfectly sharp subject, which covers a good surface of the finished photo and in case to be presented. Obviously with many Megapixels (RAW 50ml) you have to be careful of the blur, but once understood/managed to handle the results are surprising and unreachable with other cameras. Noise management is good/excellent even at 1600/2000 ISO, and in M-RAW (30ml pix) in the fact of noise the results are identical to the 5DMK3 (which I own).... In RAW at 50ml of pixel up to 1200 ISO image rendering is unbeatable in every point of view, sharpness, color and effect three-dimensionality... The workability in post is very good and in the recovery lights/shadows are absent the artifacts... Zero Bandig, which is sometimes present in the 5d3. Some might say that in naturalistic would serve the burst over 5 Mbps, personally I do not find limiting, of course it is my way of photographing, rarely (almost never) use continuous shots of The autofocus if set well is fast and precise, of course the The lens must be adjusted to the performance request. Even the ergonomics (for me that I have big hands) is perfect, as the feeling of robustness... I'm not going to list all the custom settable functions, one of those (for me) very useful, set the over/under exposure in a click with main wheel. The thing that must be said is that the micro fine adjustment must be done at a point, and that wants lenses/optics performing/solving, with these attentions the result is of sure effect.... A real pleasure to see the results obtained..! A tip to those who wanted to buy or bought it recently, patience and commitment, use it frequently, it takes some time to understand and discover all its potential. I gave a 10 vote in view of the difference in all round performance with other cameras owned, even different serie1. sent on March 27, 2019 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Great overall quality of pictures, nice colors and bookens, good construction structure, price is worth everything that costs. Cons: An easel bracket is not easy to handle, using the free hand better to remove it. Opinion: I needed a flexible lens for portraiture, but I did not want to invest a remarkable figure (paid a third of the series 2 whitewash though second-hand). RnComperate still used in warranty conditions like the new I waited a few months before reviewing this lens after having tried on several occasions I can say that the results are of considerable value. Excellent overall image quality, for my taste, good color and booken, good construction of the lens structure, also pleasing as aesthetics. Excellent for result and functionality, the two-position stabilizer, the AF is precise and fast even in conditions of light light. At first I noticed immediately that the sharpness (especially 200mm f2.8) was not exactly what made fine micro adjustment (+7 on Canon 5dmk3) became very good even at full opening, already at f3.5 is excel.nncomplex of this lens I can not say that well, I made this choice because I had the opportunity to try the various similar on the market and to date i can say that iPhoto quality is almost the same, perhaps the whistle has slightly something in his favor at TA, but considering the price, I think this optic is a great alternative. It's a good idea to do it professionally. rnHo given a good 10 for quality ratio.rnI can not recommend it. sent on September 25, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Flare resistance, sharpness, color beauty,is and af noteworthy, minimum distance focus,yield to TA,yield with multiplier 1.4xlll. Cons: It might sound like the price but once tried it is no longer. Opinion: Hi... It is obvious that when you buy an optics you do it based on what kind of photography we love to do, I for 95% do naturalistic. I had both the old 100-400 (pompone) and the 400 f5.6...good optics that also gave me a lot of satisfaction,this 100-400is2 however it's quite another thing, a span above the old "pompone". Of the 400 5.6 as image quality is slightly higher (but it is), the booken is far more beautiful and pasty, plus it has full flare resistance... sharpness, beauty of color,large af, minimum distance focus (less than one meter), rendered to TA, and a large, large double function stabilizer. I have always used the old and the 400 5.6 as complementary lenses to the super fixed canvas (first 500mm and after 600mm),a year ago the and 400 5.6 I sold them and took the 100-400 is2, this has become the lens I use most frequently , and I would say with great satisfaction of the results obtained, making the super canvas work in certain contexts, in practice only in comfortable places. In fact, this jewel with 1.4x (560mm f8) has the same yield as smooth... With series 1 (e.g.:1dmk4 - kenko 2.0x) you have an 800mm f11 with appreciable quality,obviously in certain cases and with very favorable light. For rambling photography I think has no rivals, lightness, practicality, image quality, robustness and tropicalization. The price,certainly important, may seem excessive but the money it costs (for me) is worth them all... recommended, in its category (zoom) has no rivals... vote10. sent on December 14, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: Maf fast, crisp, beautiful colors, lightweight, takes up little space, quality / price ratio very good. Cons: I do not see contro.per me in his band is the best. Opinion: I own the canon 400f5, 6 for a few years, optics which I could not do without, is the lens that I always keep on hand, both for convenience and space-saving, but especially for its resa.rnMaf fast, colors and sharpness at the top, it is clear even at RT, but f6, 3 f10 is a blade, the only drawback is that the focus slightly less than other fixed serie1e2 but with the price differences of thousands of Euros, God forbid. ...! rnSi is f5, 6 and lacks the stabilizer, but I can assure you that 90% of the photos is successful, its lightness and maneuverability make up for the gap, I pulled out the delicious file shot with 1/50 freehand impossible for me with other goals that I have for example: Canon 500mm.rnE 'so handy that I get on the subject with unparalleled ease, it is deadly on tracking of birds in volo.rnIl price "even if not a little to the times we live in "is affordable, well ... money well spent! in used you can find the solution and save money.rnDa always carry around, even to those who have megaottiche .... rnConsigliatissimo ....! sent on July 30, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
