RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Augusto Baldoni
www.juzaphoto.com/p/AugustoBaldoni



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Augusto Baldoni


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

lowepro_transit_sling250awLowepro Transit Sling 250 AW

Pros: Virtually everything.

Cons: It must not overload because, being single sided, it becomes uncomfortable.

Opinion: convenient and efficient backpack, carries on his back for hours without fatigue. The important thing is not to overload it. I am using it with a Nikon D5500 and two zoom lenses (10-24 and 18-200), lightweight tripod (or MeFoto A0350 Gorillapod Focus) and, sometimes, flash. Also filters, batteries and accessories. It seems to me the right weight. Whereas when they are "around photographing" the D5500 with a lens is always out from the bag, around your neck or in your hand, the weight is further reduced, and you almost forget that you have the backpack on his back.

sent on February 08, 2016


joby_gorillapod_focusJoby GorillaPod Focus

Pros: Quality materials, perfect realization, lightness, compactness and adaptability to the bag in which you want to store.

Cons: Nothing. It may seem a bit 'expensive, but I think it's costing EUR.

Opinion: After purchasing the model SRL-Zoom and having appreciated features and ease of use, I decided to take even the Focus to have greater capacity and stability, although it has slightly larger in size and weight. After a good year of use, the Gorilla has become indispensable to me. It is clear that it does not replace a traditional tripod, but it can help to not rimpiangerne often lack (especially on the road). I absolutely recommend to equip its ball head, really good. Headless, in fact, it becomes almost impossible to adjust the framing.

sent on July 19, 2015


joby_gorillapod_slrzoomJoby GorillaPod SLR-Zoom

Pros: Well done, quality materials, lightweight.

Cons: The weight flow rate declared (3 kg) is a bit 'optimistic.

Opinion: It 'was my first Gorillapod, bought to hold a Nikon D5200 + 18-200. Despite the weight of body lens was well below the 3 kg reported by Joby, I had the impression that the stability of the Gorilla was the limit. So I bought the model Focus and the problems are gone, but maybe they were just my feelings. Today I use it with compattona and became an accessory ever present in the bag. Due to its characteristics it can be adapted and put in any stock, even small and not intended for use photo. His head, with quick and level, is very well made with quality materials. Despite being considered an accessory, I consider it absolutely essential to not go crazy being shot. Let it be clear that the Gorilla does not replace a good traditional easel, but on the road you can not miss and you do not notice.

sent on July 19, 2015


nikon_d5500Nikon D5500

Pros: Sensor, rotatable display, compact and lightweight

Cons: It not tropicalized (but I do not care .....)

Opinion: Coming from the D5200, which I was happy, I was looking for something better in the remaining segment to use APS-C lenses already in my possession. Nikon course, to continue the tradition that has lasted nearly 40 years. I was a bit 'undecided between the D7200 and the D5500, in the end I chose the latter after having tried, and both at the same time, in negozio.rnPoiché have the same sensor (excellent), my decision was influenced by a number of factors, perhaps subjective, but for me important: rn- the display is adjustable and excellent quality (that of the D7200 is fixed, and I do not understand why ....). It is also touch screen and, in hindsight, I have to acknowledge that this "optional" is really utilissimo.rn- compactness and lightness, far better than the already good D7200. Many say, with disdain, that is light because "plastic": true, but the "plastic", for some decenni, has replaced metal in a multitude of opportunities and with better results. And then I think the strength of the "plastic" is not much lower than that of metal: if a D5500 D7200 were to fall from a table, I think you would be to do the funeral at entrambe.rn- burst "declared" best in D7200 ....... but with a proper SD (see my review http://www.juzaphoto.com/recensione.php?l=it&t=sandisk_extreme_pro_sdxc64gb_95mbs) can guarantee you that the difference is really the D7200 is minima.rn- tropicallized the D5500 not. I do not care, even the goals that I use are not (VR II Nikkor 18-200 and 10-24). Also I hate the rain (so if it rains I do not want to get wet and, therefore, does not risk even the camera) and are allergic to sand (so no pictures on the beach or in the desert) .rn- price: the D5500 costs about 400 euro less than D7200.rnQuesti factors have guided my choice and, after a couple of months, we are well felice.rn

sent on June 13, 2015


yongnuo_yn568exYongnuo YN-568EX II (Nikon)

Pros: Features almost professional and quality / price ratio

Cons: For now nothing

Opinion: I own it for almost a year and I use it only when they are forced to use the flash (I prefer the light environment). So I can not consider myself a "lampista". In any case, he never missed a shot though, when shooting with reflected light, it tends to underexpose slightly. However simple correction in the room or in post production. The power is remarkable, good build quality and the price makes it accessible to all.

sent on May 28, 2015


lexar_sdhc32gb_2000x

Pros: Fast

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: Excellent performance, I managed to solve the problems of burst of Nikon D5500, in both speed and cadence in the shooting. So more than satisfied dell'acquisto.rnHo did a home test, repeated several times, and I managed to get a burst of 50 shots in RAW in 19 seconds on a regular basis and without delays. JPG END the same you get 50 shots in 10 seconds. In RAW + JPG END in 28 seconds with about 10 scatti.rnPoi slowdown after I had the opportunity to try the Sandisk Extreme Pro SDXC 95MB / s and got the same results with the difference that the Sandisk costs almost half the Lexar. rnrnQuindi, with the D5500, it is useless to throw money to buy the Lexar Sandisk because already manages to get the most you can give the camera. This is confirmed by the comparison test I did with the Sandisk Extreme SDHC I to 45MB / s, which provided a much worse result: JPG already in the barrage of 50 shots took 14 seconds with a slowdown after the tenth shot.

sent on May 21, 2015


sandisk_extreme_pro_sdxc64gb_95mbs

Pros: Excellent and fast

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: With the Nikon D5500 I solved every problem of burst. I did a home test, repeated several times, and I managed to get a burst of 50 shots in RAW in 19 seconds on a regular basis and without delays. JPG END the same you get 50 shots in 10 seconds. In RAW + JPG END in 28 seconds with a slowdown after about 10 shots. The 5500 is thus exploited to the maximum and it has confirmation from the comparative test I did with the Lexar 2000x Pro SDHC UHS-II to 300MB / s, which costs almost twice as much, but from what I got identical performance. With the SanDisk Extreme SDHC I to 45MB / s, however, the result was much worse: JPG already in the barrage of 50 shots took 14 seconds with a slowdown after the tenth step; for the burst in RAW it took 35/2 with slowdown after five shots; RAW + JPG in less than 53 seconds with a slowdown after five shots.

sent on May 15, 2015


nikon_coolpix_p7000Nikon Coolpix P7000

Pros: Semi professional, shooting in RAW, using the same battery of Nikon series 3xxx and 5xxx

Cons: Unable to mount filters

Opinion: I had a Coolpix P50 of which I was pleased, despite some deficiencies in 2007, when it was presented, came within the norma.rnQuando in 2010 came the P7000 the bought immediately "in the dark", relying on the characteristics published by Nikon. Finally, with a compact (or rather "compattona"), they could have characteristics from "almost reflex". I must admit that the venture had been well rewarded. The P7000 was really a great car, improved slightly with the P7100. The P7000 has been my constant companion until the end of 2013, when I replaced it with the P7800 with which Nikon has touched perfection (for my needs).

sent on May 10, 2015


nikon_coolpix_p50Nikon Coolpix P50

Pros: Very compact, lightweight, excellent ergonomics, uses simple AA batteries, good optics.

Cons: In 2007, when it was put up for sale, it had semi-professional features and excellent performance. Today, 8 years later, can not hold a candle to the modern compact.

Opinion: I had bought for her always with me (then the camera phones gave unacceptable results). I've brought back a bit 'all over and gave me a lot of satisfaction. Then I bought the P7000 (now I have the P7800) and the P50 went to my daughter and, with her, he continued to travel around the world: China, USA, Mexico, Caribbean. Despite the age she continues to make her look good if we are content with jpg and you have excessive demands.

sent on May 09, 2015


nikon_coolpix_p7800Nikon Coolpix P7800

Pros: Professional characteristics, focal length, optical quality and possibility of using filters.

Cons: The dimensions of the sensor (1 / 1.7 ").

Opinion: I already had a P7000 which I was very happy, but the 7800 is much better, almost perfect. It is compact enough that you can always have in tow. Its yield does not regret having left the camera at home, especially if you are not forced to to crop the image and then you use the file to 100%. In fact, if you crop a shot (even at high ISO), the qualitative difference with an APS C (not to mention a FF) becomes apparent. The operating characteristics are purely professional: rn- electronic viewfinder, essential for when there is too much light and the monitor becomes unreadable rn- shooting in Raw rn- monitor orientabilern- level / electronic horizon and grid to facilitate composizionern- focal length range from 28 200 equivalent rn- automatic, semi-automatic, manual, 3 customizable programs, a good number of "scenes" programmed rn- bracketing rn- over and under exposure rn- possibility of using filters (diameter 40.5 mm) rn- ability to create settings personalizzatern- doubia ring multi function (for example, to adjust with the times and the other diaphragms when operating in M) rn- battery EN EL 14, the same as the entry level SLR Nikon rne much more ancora.rnPer Finally, I will change only when the Nikon will release a camera with a sensor similar to but larger

sent on January 05, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me