|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Professione_reporter www.juzaphoto.com/p/Professione_reporter  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN C Pros: Portability, Sharpness, Weight Cons: Nobody Opinion: I made an apparently 'strange' choice: I replaced the Sigma 14-24mm Art with this little gem. Strange because the Art is a stellar lens and excellent lenses should be kept. But for a while now, I've been prioritizing portability over any other feature. Because portability often makes all the difference, it makes you put a lens in your backpack that, otherwise, stays at home. There is no doubt that the 10-18mm is a miracle of portability. And also image quality if you consider the size. sent on April 28, 2024 |
 | Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Pros: definitely price. But also a considerable sharpness. And solid construction. Cons: Lack of stabilizer, but for what it costs .... Opinion: Upon arriving, I took a dozen indoor portraits, in an absolutely unfavorable conditions. Sony A6000 camera. When I opened the files could not believe my eyes, a sharpness of fear (I Nikon full frame, so I can easily make the comparison). I am very happy to have resisted the sirens and, after the usual numerous readings, preferred to have an economic objective but by reputation. Deserved, I must say. sent on March 30, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Great sharpness, even over long distances. Price. Cons: One drawback: the weight Opinion: I am a photographer from the pack because I use this light abnormally: not to photograph the animals (for which it was conceived) but for the landscape. In the natural landscape to enhance the geometries, the succession and the crushing of the plans. In the urban landscape to seek views and cuts other than those that can be achieved with optical shorter. In both cases shows excellent sharpness, that is rarely found in optics of this type. Thanks to a great stabilizer, you can also use a free hand, but is uncomfortable because it is a perspective very heavy. Unfortunately supertele are heavy and the Tamron is no exception. sent on March 08, 2015 |
 | Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm f/1.8 Pros: Zeiss quality, as is traditional. Brightness & lightness. Cons: One drawback: the cost. Given its compact mirrorless optical (Zeiss 24 inclusive), you always have the feeling of spending too much buying them. Why vieen missing the relationship with weight. But it's just a psychological issue. And then the quality Zeiss pays ... Opinion: That 's what I was looking for: a fixed high quality. I really like the focal, 35 equivalent, which makes it particularly suitable for the street. Even for the low weight and the trend invisibility. Bright and quality, even at maximum aperture: so unfocused and excellent opportunity to shoot at night freehand. For all these things I took it and, from the first tests, I is not at all disappointing. sent on February 28, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: So much quality concentrated in so lightly: that want more? Ideal for street and portrait Cons: No one is perfect so Opinion: Not a fault of course: it is physically scarce, this leads to underestimate him, to put other optics in the bag. And to hatch substitutions: for months I have been toying with the idea of ??replacing it with the fantastic Art Sigma 50, far more handsome and showy: it took a few laps in the city streets, in the fog, Freehand, wide open, we capture atmospheres magic, light and color. A real pleasure to photograph well, an ancient pleasure, we risk losing. You return to the origins, to a SIMPLE way to shoot. Does not have the convenience Zoom but better this way, the fifty forces you to think, to move wisely to compose the image. And it's discreet, barely visible, ideal for the street. And shots for hours without fatigue, because the hands and wrists bear it well. sent on February 07, 2015 |
 | Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Pros: Very versatile, crisp, perfect for the street Cons: Recently purchased, for now I do not see obvious defects Opinion: I took a few days, coupled with Sony A6000. I thought about it a bit 'before you buy it, is not that cost very little. I took it for fascination (the brand Zeiss intrigues always) but also for exclusion: zoom ordinance, the 16-50, did not convince me at all. I already have a full frame Nikon kit, but I wanted a lightweight instrumentation, barely visible to the street. A Leica of the poor, in fact. So no interchangeable lenses (for now), but a single lens handyman: in this sense, the 16-70 is very reliable, covering a range of 24-100mm (thinking in terms of full frame) with which you can do everything. And 'f4, not very bright, but in return is a fixed-f4. In Nikon full frame, the optical f4 gave an excellent account of themselves. Optics sharp, especially in the center. The edges you notice a slight decline, but absolutely acceptable. sent on January 16, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 105mm f/2 D DC Pros: Excellent sharpness, strength, brightness. In addition, the Defocus Control, although I have not used much. Cons: I can not find fault. Opinion: At the time I preferred to His Majesty the 85mm 1.4. I have not ever regretted it because I consider it excellent, especially in the portrait. Over time, the price has remained stable, while 85 reached high prices. Joyful Mysteries of the market. A DC off, has excellent sharpness, a real blade. Another strength is its color rendition. And then the robustness: no plastic, only metal. Nevertheless, it is not heavy. sent on April 22, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
