|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alessandro Oberto www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlessandroOberto ![]() |
![]() | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Quality / extraordinary price: for that which costs you remain stunned for sharpness and build quality. Cons: I would be dishonest to specify these for what it costs perhaps improved engagement of the hood, but also a lack of custody "battle". Opinion: I'm not a fan of naturalistic hunting; mainly photographing landscapes and people, this is a lens that very little use, but in life you can never know, be "covered" to 300mm can always come in handy. I used it in the tennis tournaments, in a couple of nature reserves and "tighten" on some particular landscapes. I was surprised, the subject off well from the background and really competitive sharpness. To find a nit, maybe the colors are slightly desaturates, but nothing that can not be corrected within minutes of post production. But how do you ask for at this price? sent on April 20, 2016 |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Color rendering, weight, versatility, VR. Cons: There a version 2.8, it would be a final lens. Opinion: Have been debated last between this lens and the superb 14-24, I finally persuaded by three factors: the ability to mount circular filters, weight, and not least the price. The quality is excellent, the sharpness slightly lower at 14-24 but still respectable. The focal 16-35 is really super versatile: from a good wide-angle lens is passed to a report, it very much appreciated the use bed, especially in the reception with its scenes of celebration ... it is always ready to capture the large table or frame a little bit narrower. I use it also for the night: although the opening is not as wide, the yield is still excellent. The Vr is quiet and efficient, does not hide the fact that for the same price, I would have preferred a 2.8 unregulated. In any case, we recommended as build quality. sent on April 20, 2016 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me