|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mufle7 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mufle7  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Weight, keeps the value over time, Tropicalised, great zoom range, nice blurred, stabilizer and engine perfect. Cons: Probably soft on the sides Opinion: This is the lens that should sell in combo with each camera body. Do not listen to those who say that it is wasted on APS-C: I use it for months with my 600d; must only have the foresight to have a panoramic lens behind. Although in 2005 its value over time remains virtually unchanged: only the purists (those who spend € 2000 for the 24-70 2.8 II is canon) turn up their noses when they speak. Love at first sight. sent on May 29, 2014 |
 | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Pros: Focal sharpness, weight Cons: Dark and not weather sealed Opinion: Port ALWAYS with me this lens (going steady with a 24-105); I use it almost exclusively to 8 mm (I have a 600d): I find it wonderful for landscapes and great fun for shooting in the city; architecture becomes magical and almost movimento.rnE 'a little dark but it does not matter: you can shoot at 1/8! not moved. Old world if you have a aps-c sent on May 29, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III Pros: lightweight, good zoom range. Cons: Everything else Opinion: After a month of using an SLR (with a minimum of PP) one wonders why not sell the camera body ONLY: within thirty days of photos in fact, we realize that unnecessary spending is to buy the body kit with this lens ; is really poor. Save the money and get a Tamron 17-50 2.8 or smooth a canon 50mm 1.8. sent on May 28, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
