Reviews written by Nicola Biondo

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nicola Biondo
www.juzaphoto.com/p/NicolaBiondo

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Nicola Biondo

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Viltrox AF 85mm f/1.8 II

Pros: Good performance at F 1.8 with Canon Eos R, the center of the image and bokeh are great. A little bit of vignetting at the edges but nothing irreparable then in p.p. Lightness.

Cons: Hood not much but price half of the Canon 85 mm f 2.0. It is not stabilized.

Opinion: My opinion aligns with the previous ones. Unfortunately with the RF mount there is not much, one of the few portrait lenses with an excellent blur at 1.8 can be this Viltrox otherwise you can spend much more with the Canon F 2.0 that costs twice or with the older brothers RF 85 F1.2 whose price is multiplied by 10. Colors not at Canon level but can be improved in post production. You can see in the gallery "Photos in no particular order" of portraits taken with Canon Eos R and Viltrox 85 mm f 1.8.

sent on March 07, 2023

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Pros: Objective handyman, light stabilized to tropical incision good "is not a fixed so you can not have a knife" bought as a kit with 6 D. The 'F 4 is not a problem, at least for me, of course, but nothing distorts to 24 mm of irreparable in post-production; compared to previous versions has more resistance to flare

Cons: For me the only thing wrong is the zoom system, when you bring the lens to 105mm pump air inside the sensor; Online price though tend to decrease. The edges to the center but it is not as disease is common in many zooms in the same category.

Opinion: I had a 5D Mark II with 24-70 f 2.8 I ° version, then unfortunately I suffered a theft, I found myself with nothing. I lost 70-200, 50mm flash memory cards etc.. "Thieves have made a good Easter" To start I took the kit with 6 D 24-105, considering the price of the 24-70 f 2.8 is now unattainable. Taking some shots I've seen brighter colors "is not on the edge," and I do not know if it depends on the lens in question or by the camera software. I do not feel the nostalgia of 24-70 as picture, also the edges was not much more defined and the much lighter weight you tired but very much less. I was surprised to flare, the last specimens have been improved, such as goal-rounder I gave him a nine.

sent on June 10, 2014