|
| sent on 12 Dicembre 2025
Pros: if found with RF mount about 300€: sharpness, aesthetic finish, blurred (it's 1.8 at 85mm you know that from good blur, but maybe it's not really 1.8)
Cons: definitely lens hood and cap: hateful. so-so focusing motor: noise that seems to have a Vespa stuck under the barrel, and it's not really a splinter but so much so that you take portraits of it not sport
Opinion: taken to try the focal length, I like it. I'm not a professional, but I think that to work on it without extreme pretensions is great, for an amateur even more than necessary. vote 9 because at this price you can ask for very little more, even if the hood and cap are OBEDIENT, and it is not a small detail: the cap does not hook and often jumps off, and if you don't notice it when you put it in your backpack they are troubles. The lens hood, however, is even worse: hard, it is difficult to find the joint and even here it is not a small one: you have to hold the neck of the barrel with one hand near the coupling on the camera body and then rotate trying to tighten or release the lens hood, so much so that done only with one hand I felt the lens move on the mount, not to drop it, of course, but over time the camera side mount and also the contacts can wear out. This alone is the biggest flaw I find, because risking ruining the mount in the room to save 5 euros on lens hood design is, excuse me, the classic cinesata. That said, if you are careful and have patience with these maneuvers, you have a nice lens in your hand, more between f2-2.5 than f1.8 according to someone as a light adjustable to the sensor, but even if it were 85mm f2 at 300 € with AF RF mount you find an alternative. Of course you don't have the lens correction profiles on the various programs, nice annoyance, but in my opinion the issue of withdrawn canon licenses returns so it's not his fault. If you are a professional and you can spend more, allow yourself more, if you are an amateur or you are starting the professional set (understood photo by profession) it is ok not to break the bank and destroy budgets on flashes, diffusers, stands and other lenses. Last note: if it is true that maybe between 300 and 800 € there is a gap of choice and therefore it would deserve a 10 I say no, no because then there are several 90-100mm macro options that honestly change very little the performance (we go up to f2.8 but more mm if you look at the blurry), solving all the annoyances of grafts, caps, profiles without compromising optical resolution. So 9 generous, no more |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
