|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Kamik64 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Kamik64  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3 IS Pros: Construction, AF precision, relatively light and un cumbersome for the equivalent focal, multiplied Cons: Sharpening not at the top, the stabilizer does not interface with the one in the chamber Opinion: A well-built zoom, apart from the very delicate and, risking detachable easily. Considering that it is an equivalent 200-800 in the FF format; all in all, it makes, together with the camera, the system light and compact. The stabilizer unfortunately does not interface with that present in the Olympus machine bodies so, via used alone, disabling that of the camera; however, it works excellently allowing the freehand use of the optics. The AF (used on OM-D-M1 MkII) is also excellent. As for sharpness, however, it has disappointed my expectations a little; although good even without closing the diaphragm, it is safely overcome by a crop of images taken with a 40-150 PRO + MC14 so, in the end, if one has this goal, in my opinion, it makes no sense to buy the 100-400; at the limit, better add the excellent MC20 duplicator. Speaking of duplicers, I tried to mount the MC14 and, I have to say, it has a good yield anyway. sent on May 10, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS M100 Pros: Size, quality of JPG files, price-quality ratio in general Cons: Missing the flash slide, the selector does not have the standard shutter modes (A, S, M, P) Opinion: For the kind of photos I do I have always been intrigued by cameras that, despite the size, to nose, seem of good quality. When, given the great price that is now proposed, (just over €300 in kit with the 15-45), I decided to buy it, I was not denied. The excellent internal processor churn out beautiful JPG ready to use and, is often tempted to use it in automatic mode. It is rather cumbersome to work in standard modes, A, S, M; You have to select them from the menu as they are not in the wheel. Given the size advice to use it with its dedicated optics; The 15-45 of the kit is not bad at all. Using a very inexpensive meike adapter, I tried to mount Optical L series lenses, the result surprised me. Recommended for travel and, all the situations in which you want to photograph without being noticed. sent on January 14, 2019 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 Pros: Crisp, compact and lightweight Cons: Lens hood is not supplied, the price is still a bit 'high for its category Opinion: Mounted on a light body, in my case OM-D-M5, it becomes a faithful companion of walks and cycling. Along with a mini tripod type Manfrotto PIXI, it's all in a tiny strap allowing you to walk in a relaxing, a real pleasure for lovers of landscapes or architectural photos, always with you ready to capture the moment or the particular interesting. As for the technical features I have nothing to add to the previous review. To have something more to wait the new PRO 7-14 f2.8 but, weight, size and cost of course will not be the same as this, as a compromise between quality and portability will remain unbeatable. sent on May 29, 2015 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Optical quality and excellent construction, weight and dimensions compared to the category it belongs to, full complement Cons: Hood a bit 'delicate Opinion: Although, under the Micro 4/3, an optical demanding regarding size and weight cost is competitive with rivals in the world reflex. I speak of the 70-200 f2.8 stabilized. I got to do a brief comparison with the Tamron SP 70-200 f2.8 DI VC USD mounted on Canon 70D therefore, considering the crop factor, a focal length roughly equal to 40-150 in question, with weights and smaller unable to keep up with the competitor except for reactivity where the AF 40-150 is in a bit scarce but, this is due to the characteristics of the system goal-machine. I was able to use it, with enormous satisfaction to 360 ° in the architectural, portrait, street, close-up, above all in the most difficult for me or the theater (accurate that I bought especially for this purpose), mounted on M1 has returned great shots even above 1600 ISO. Council, for reasons of convenience the purchase in kit with the multiplier 1.4 which, with great surprise, no perdere almost nothing in sharpness. sent on May 28, 2015 |
 | Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III Pros: Build quality, weight, versatility, lens hood supplied. Cons: The price should be a little '"filed". Opinion: From the first shots I had made a good impression, well built, the rings are very fluid. Considering the wide zoom range has a good degree of sharpness, I found also quite bright. Has no stabilizer, something irrelevant whether the mounts on Olympus bodies, tried both on OM-D-M1 M5 AF reacts very well and is well balanced by contrast, the price is still a bit 'higher than the performance but still lower than the counterparts Olympus. Excellent as a handyman travel. sent on March 02, 2015 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Construction quality, electronic viewfinder fabulous Cons: Battery life (but now they give you the grip), menu a bit 'clunky Opinion: For almost a year I have supplied a substantial fleet Olympus (Stylus1 OM-D-M5 and the OM-D-M1) which I can only speak well with regard to innovation and quality in general, but especially for the "portability" of the entire system, the technical aspects, which I share, you find them widely well exposed in previous reviews. This machine is in direct competition with the reflex midrange (eg. My Canon 70D) is currently proposed 1,950 € in kit with the fabulous 12-40 f 2.8 (alone costs almost € 1,000) and grip HLD 7 tribute more, a voucher of € 200 for the purchase of a further goal, you do the math. Compared to younger sister OM-D-M5 is more "SLR-like" for technical characteristics, type of handle, keys and size, it maintains however, in my opinion, the best price / performance for those who, having already an SLR , wants to adopt a valid alternative "travel". If you want one machine and you have to choose between SLR (acertain range), and this probably know that this will always be with you while the reflex sometimes will stay at home. sent on November 26, 2014 |
 | Olympus Stylus 1 Pros: Objective spectacular and bright, excellent sensor & electronic viewfinder, considering the size, featuring a practical Cons: Small keys, whether made Tropicalised would be the maximum Opinion: It replaced the very excellent Nikon Coolpix 7100 as a travel companion, I have not much to add to previous comments that illustrate very well this "big small". You can carry it anywhere, will reward you with great shots from landscape to portrait The council also to those who approach the hobby of photography and still does not know which way to take ... In 400g is all it takes to give vent to their creativity. sent on November 24, 2014 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II Pros: Sharp, precise, lightweight and compact Cons: None for what it costs Opinion: I break a lance in favor of this 600 mm equivalent that takes home less than 500 € whose quality is beyond my expectations. It's certainly not suitable for extreme subjects in fast motion but, for example. great for shots "stolen" where you can, keeping you at a distance and unobtrusively view the compact system camera / lens taking photos that have nothing to envy in terms of clarity and definition to "conjuring" well more noble. Even if it is dark a lens with the excellent stabilizer of the OM-D is able to avoid camera shake. sent on November 21, 2014 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros: Build quality in general, lightweight, excellent sensor, good electronic sight. Cons: Small keys, battery life, somewhat cumbersome menu Opinion: I have both reflex (currently Canon 70D) and two micro 4/3 (this and the OM-D E-M1). This machine is a great compromise between "transportability" and quality, once put in the bag it ends that you leave at home the reflex forever (in a single shoulder I can fit both machine bodies with their goals). The software is designed to churn out excellent jpeg already "packaged" with a lot of creative variants for those who do not want to try their hand at post-production. Compared to the older sister and, at reflexes, it is not equipped with the ready-to-use keys that I consider indispensable (ISO, AF mode, Exposure, WB, shooting mode). Another important thing not to be underestimated is the price, thanks to the aggressive commercial policy of Olympus you definitely spend less, at equal quality, than the similar kit of a reflex with the additional advantage that .... at the end of the day your back thanks. J sent on November 21, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
