|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gabriele_giacomo_patrone www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gabriele_giacomo_patrone  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D5500 Pros: sensor series 7000, iso 25600, touch display, a / is 39 points Cons: weight too light Opinion: newly purchased for the sostiture 3200 I used to a few years. the main difference (and the more macroscopic) is the autofocus 39 points. also pledging not you put it never in crisis, which with the previous 9 was not too difficult to make. the sharpness of the details you see, but perhaps not so striking (at least in terms of good light). the battery should also last longer. the swiveling display is a nice convenience, especially in self-timer or angles particularly cumbersome (although use almost exclusively the mirno). the touch is definitely interesting (wineskin to a more appealing graphic) .rnnon find particular fault, except perhaps (and here I'll be a lone voice), the excessive lightness. I would have liked a more massive body and heavy, sorpattutto when I match at 18 to 140 with which I find a little unbalanced. sent on July 20, 2015 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: excellent workmanship, weight, versatility, performance wide angle Cons: regulator focal length too sensitive Opinion: tried some time ago and it was love at first sight. I got online recently and I must say that the first trials held up very well. the bill is in my opinion very good. nice ring to operate and very light. nititido is nice and really surprised me on two points. color rendering really surprising against the light. you can pretty much take pictures of everything and he did not bat an eyelid, with flair drastically reduced. no vignetting. Moreover, another remarkable thing, in the long exposures (two seconds) does not suffer at all out of focus, even by hand. really versatile also under this point of view. compared to the Nikon 18-140 which is my other goal, has made more uniform, some in all openings, no great deviations from highest to lowest. I honestly do not feel the need to stop in more than half (compared to the other version) .rnl'autofocus (on Nikon ultrasound) is a very very fast. struggling a bit in low light conditions and in cases of foreground subjects. nothing that can not be overcome by changing mildly angolazione.rnil defectgreatest, in my opinion, lies in the focus ring. on the one hand is very soft and pleasant to use, but maybe even too soft. the result is that it may move inadvertently, with the result to shorten or lengthen the focal without noticing. a sin, snap case. sent on November 16, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Pros: excellent versatility, good yield to 18mm, good construction, acceptable price Cons: excellent yield not to 140mm Opinion: bought to replace the 18-55 kit from, on the one hand has confirmed the good quality to 18, with a brightness picture even in twilight more than acceptable (possibly manageable by increasing the iso). I never noticed the particular distortions and / or aberrations of the 18, for which the focal maggiormente.rnaggiunge use that little something extra to the 105 which is not bad at all. of course, like all the zoom of this range, the maximum focal detail I suffer a bit, but with the right format, even as early as 130 comprono is really a great deal of need. a great all do, because among other things, in the white box is located at honest prices sent on June 29, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR II Pros: economic, copatto, 18 does his work honestly Cons: economic construction, compact, short-throw Opinion: bought as a kit with the D3200, it is noted immediately for compactness. its retrattilità can come in handy (especially if you impute to turn much walking machine with a shoulder strap). although personally I have not found a feature rivoluzonaria.rnper with regard to yield, since it is "sold" as original equipment, in my opinion at 18mm onestissimamente does its job. I never noticed big flaws, even has a color rendering index of all respect. the maximum focal length instead, it shows all its limits. really miss a few inches more by not having to "pounce" on the scene and the yield to 55 is not great, in fact a lot of effort to make dettagli.rncome brightness I was quite amazed. Also in 3.5, in the evening you get things all in all discrete. yes, the 2.8 is another thing, but at 3.5 I know that we will have abiutare ... by the way, you can compensate with ISO in a more egregious that. sent on June 29, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D IF Pros: good vision to 24 mm, distortion absent on film, af fairly fast, brightness Cons: Build quality is not exciting outdoor Opinion: I've used it for a long time on my F80 (of course we talk about the film). The auto focus does his job honestly and the lens was at his best at 24. brightness with a 2.8 is respectable, even if talking about the film is best to work quite high. the external build quality is not great, but I've seen worse. has a good setting and a good "manual". I've never tried it on digital, but film is really a lot of satisfaction sent on June 29, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
