|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Arruffato www.juzaphoto.com/p/Arruffato ![]() |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Brightness, strength, mount the filters 77, good resolution if closed. Cons: Weight, soft at the edges at TA Opinion: And 'perspective as powerful as focal length and brightness accordingly but heavy. The brightness, however, is to be exploited only in an emergency to not undermine the bordi.rnLa distortion is not very high, is barely noticeable and easily corrected in PP.rnLa color rendition is neutral in line with all other Nikon. rnIl weight limits its use, it is a perspective that you are bringing just in case. The door is if it knows of usarla.rnUna is worth mentioning the fact that the mountains are the filters from 77 enough standard.rn sent on September 16, 2014 |
![]() | Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Pros: Lightweight, well-built Cons: Focus uncertain. Price not low, considering surrender. Opinion: The opening of the box shows a perspective well done, with a front cover well done. The plastics are precise and communicate an impression of robustness. RNLA test was made with a Nikon D600. rnL'immagine has a good yield of neutral color with contrast elevato.rnFatti the very first shots I have to say I was expecting something more from sharpening but you probably are that I expect too much. The edges of the images are soft but improved enough stopping down to f8 are more or less as the center. RNLA autofocus is pretty useless, it would be recommended to be used in hyperfocal. The image is in focus so that the lens focuses on random 1 m to infinity at will, and the results are completely equivalent, especially if it is closed a little 'diaframma.rnProbabilmente is a problem with the product category, the sharpness is not that of a 50 or a good wide-angle, do not expect pictures cut with the laser. rnIl price is not really popolare.rnrn sent on August 01, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon D600 Pros: Resolution of the stellar sensor. Lightweight, quiet for being a FF DSLR. Good behavior at high ISO. Nikon ecosystem. Cons: Points focus but many plants. Lack 1/8000. Opinion: Coming from a D300 I got it used at a reasonable price and I immediately felt at home. Ergonomically "falls" in his hand as if it had always been. The information in the viewfinder are easy to find and you need not take my eyes off. The sensor is spectacular, at the moment I do not want anything more. A strong crop highlights the flaws of the optics, but just look at the shot in his right cut and everything disappears. Regge very good high ISO compared to the previous generation. The system of focus, quickly and accurately, is its most obvious flaw. By concentrating sensors in the center forces you to break the recovery in the two actions, focus and composition, distinct. People used to work in A, feels the lack of 1/8000 but maybe at that point we would speak of a machine to the other end of the market. There really is everything and more than you could wish for the advanced amateur. Do not forget that the ecosystem Nikon, thanks to the strategic choices made in the past allows you to find a number of objectives esagerata of all prices. sent on June 11, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon 55mm f/2.8 Micro AI-s Pros: Resolution, sharpness, weight, strength Cons: In its category (manual focus, macro) none Opinion: Bought used at a figure given after verfica online features, I must say that has maintained and exceeded expectations. The construction is indestructible, although this weight is maintained at levels more than acceptable. Of course its use is static. The resolution is the highest in the park my optics, so much so that I use it mostly ends up on a tripod to exalt it to the fullest. Who could ask for more? Practically these years I photographed for free, the rivendessi now recupererei my investment with interest. sent on May 09, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me