|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gentili Marco www.juzaphoto.com/p/GentiliMarco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: economic, precise, very good image quality Cons: the weight, the ring of maf Opinion: I write after a while I use it; only impressions about the field of course! I use it for bird life and I find really excellent from zero to 15 meters. Besides I can not judge, it is not given because even little over shooting and when shooting never throw anything buono.rnE 'a good 600mm value-priced. The use of Canon and is fine (7dII, 70D and 5dIII) .rnSulla 5dIII in my opinion is even better as dell'AF.rnDiciamo precision to 600mm has all the flaws of this focal namely reduced depth of field, need time fast shutter; but it allows you to have to crop less, thereby improving quality. Unfortunately in the shots of the birds mm are used primarily to subject little ones or very wary, amche because we often fail to make truly effective stalking to the limits of luoghi.rnIo come from the 400 mm f5.6 Canon always, beautiful! The only comparison I can make is that with the 400mm is more easy to shoot and quality "looks" better, in fact I saw that; even better because of the depth of field for the benefit of the 400mm.rnCon 600 mm have to close the iris and starting dall'f8 will have results very buoni.rnLa ring of maf is positioned at half lens and I find it a bit cumbersome, but it is subjective. sent on September 13, 2016 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: accurate autofocus, intuitive and close commands, solid despite its size Cons: Noise 1600 ISO up, shortness second card slot Opinion: only now I write my opinion, the own for about three years, he was recommended by a very good in-flight photo photographer. I followed her advice and did very well. Let's start with defects: obvious noise at high ISO, let's say that resembles the old film (which over 1600 iso was almost unwatchable). Now with a good nr program, provided you do not make crop is possible to obtain good images. Missing a second slot and could use. Now the pros: offering images, in my opinion, outstanding as the final resolution from 200 to 800 ISO; I venture to say that they are the best 7dmII that I did not have a very balanced sensor; at least to me like the most 'of the 70d behavior, I find the most real and raw with more shades of color. Autofocus can say that it is a bomb; apt their need and set in the car it is difficult that the photos are wrong. Again I find more shots hit the spot with the 70d that with 7dmII (maybe I have yet to figure out); in my opinion is the af square that in 70d is greatest while in 7dmII is more moreccolo. For the commands I find spot on them, staying with the eye in the viewfinder I can have everything under control with one hand. I brought it with me everywhere; Never sensor dirty, and so far exceptional estate in environments too wet. I I'm still excited! Of course you have to shoot when there is light !! But the picture and 'light !! The also recommend it to those who must begin with its immediacy of use. sent on April 07, 2016 |
 | Nikon 50mm f/2 AI Pros: excellent yield at all apertures, maneuverability, coast nonsense, simple construction Cons: nobody in my opinion Opinion: I still have it and do not ever give away; also used on digital is a lens really amazing. Mass precise fire; if he had the angle of view of a 35mm would be the top for me. Suitable for those who use the 50 mm in the old way; in my opinion the best of the 50 mm f 1.8 for the surrender at all apertures very steady. Optical construction simple but excellent, planar diagram 6 lenses symmetrically arranged in four groups. sent on February 24, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
