RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Gianluca Figliola Fantini
www.juzaphoto.com/p/GianlucaFigliolaFantini



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Gianluca Figliola Fantini


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_16-35_f4isCanon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Pros: Sharpness at 16mm from edge to edge

Cons: 24 the image is no longer in focus, stabilizer which stabilizes once out of 4

Opinion: After reading these opinions I purchased immediately on the Amazon.Ho did a test and I sent back the same giorno.rn1 the zoom ring was very stiff (which then, however, and is confirmed on other specimens provati.rn2 stabilizer 4-stops !!!!!!! 4 stop with the zoom set to 16mm means you can shoot handheld 1 second !!! to get an acceptable shutter to 1 second I have to take at least 4 pictures and select the least peggio.rn3 16 mm okay good but 24 to 35 and all the image slightly blurred (focus to infinity on a tripod) ('s clear that you can recover with the unsharp mask) ... rnNe I bought another one in the shop where I live, but unfortunately same defects of the Mass was not on fire and all focali.rnIl shopkeeper very patient and kind I did try a altro.Peggio.rnHo resumed primo.rnHo made hundreds of shots to figure out the problem but actually I do not know what to say. The body works well with the 70 200 f 4 canon eos 5 IS.rnCon the Mark II I tried to make micro adjustments fuoco.E I managed to get a good fire was put to the focal length of 24 mm but doing so then becomes a blur when I use the zoom to 16 mm.rnNessuno noticed strange things at 24 and 28 mm? RnPossibile I've found 3 copies you can not control evil or good Canon lenses? :-(.....................................................................................................................................................................................................rnrnOggi 01 10 2014 confirm what already scritto.Ieri I redid the test with a 6D nuova.Pensavo that my EOS 5 Mark II had problems though with 70 200 IS f4 works perfettamente.Il judgment and stesso.Difetti also recognized by venditore.Il my advice is to acqustarlo, saw the reviews, but trying it prima.Test facts wide open at f4, tripod, and at various distances including infinity focus.

sent on September 28, 2014


tamron_70-300vcTamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD

Pros: Quality between 70 and 200, accurate and price

Cons: 2.5 Stabilizer 4 stop is not as stated

Opinion: Great value prezzo.La sharpness and superior to that of my old canon 70 200 f2, 8 300 stabilizzato.A not lose a bit of nitidezza.Lo stabilizer works well if you do not go down to below 1/100 sec at 300mm zoom and 1/8 to 70 mm.Con longer we begin to see the mosso.In Ultimately though I would say that I am satisfied with anch io.Lo I will use from 70 to 200.

sent on April 12, 2014




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me