|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luca T. www.juzaphoto.com/p/LucaT.  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Sharpness, f / 2.8, Pocket, fixed high-quality, versatility. Cons: Hood not supplied as usual in non-L Canon optics. Opinion: Small pocket and fixed lens made from excellent! I use it mostly at full aperture (f / 2.8) where it is already very clear and has beautiful colors and great dettaglio.rnE 'a drive for which the image quality is far superior to that of the zoom, even the much more expensive and famous; in particular, I felt a Tamron SP 24-70 2.8 VC and incisiveness to 40mm f / 2.8 was lower than that of this small gioiellino.rnSecondo me coupled to a Canon ef-s 24 f / 2.8 (on aps-c) It is ideal for travel and reportage generic interiors at a very low cost (less than half of the excellent Canon 17-55 f / 2.8) and the quality extremely buona.rnIo use it on Canon 60d for landscape (narrow), portrait occasional street, reportage interni.rnrnAnche after buying the excellent Canon ef-s 17-55 f / 2.8 pancake I have not sold this because I think it is always useful to keep it and insert it in your bag at each output (especially when the 17- 55 is too bulky). sent on December 20, 2015 |
 | Tair-11A 135mm f/2.8 Pros: Excellent (see review below) Cons: In my opinion virtually absent given the quality / price ratio. Opinion: What can I say, it is a lens that if the plays seamlessly with modern optics in terms of quality of immagine.rnUna once accustomed to manual lenses is used with pleasure and each shot leaves surprised: color rendering, image quality, sharpness to ta. ..I am all at high levels and from a height of 60 (produced since 1955) has little to envy the optical recent and far more costose.rnL'ho bought after reading the hate me and more experienced photographers are was pleasantly impressed by this objective. sent on March 15, 2015 |
 | Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4 Pros: Very high quality, low price for a 200mm fixed. Cons: Prices are rising as for all optical vintage. It weighs a little bit but it is very solid. Opinion: I bought this lens to have a fixed 200mm of great quality at a truly budget price. I was satisfied after using just the first volta.rnAvevo already a minimum hand in the use of optical full manual (and I slide for maf manual on canon 60d) and I must say that this objective as well as having a built enviable as to strength and materials (resulting in weight gain!) is also very good quality and photographs that churns are ottime.rnPersonalmente not find the weight of a defect, it, gives me a nice solid feel and you can handle very well freehand (no shooting almost never with the tripod). sent on March 15, 2015 |
 | Zenit Helios MC 44M-7 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Quality objective, so common and cheap as extremely valuable and fun to use. The blur is a signature page in the photographs, the sharpness is very good already at room temperature and the building is solida.rnE 'obviously a manual lens and dated, but for what it costs is one of the "must have" for those who want fun to photograph. Cons: For the quality / price ratio which, frankly I do not come to mind ... Opinion: I purchased a Helios 44M-7 after reading numerous reviews from various fans and intrigued by his legendary bokeh.rnChe say, I was really happy after trying it once before; is easy to use, it is really well built as many optic once and gives images uniche.rnChi try these objectives often can not have just one ... and I do not think we need to explain why! sent on March 15, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
