JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4 : Specifications and Opinions

Lens photo unavailable

The Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4 is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1973 (discontinued). The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 100 €;

22 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.

Specifications
Focal lenght	200 mm
Angle of view	12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4
Aperture blades	8
Lenses/Groups	5 elements in 4 groups
Min. focus distance	1.80 meters
Reproduction ratio
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Manual Focus
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	58 mm
Lens hood	Built-in
Weather sealing	No
Weight	980 g
Dimensions	78 x 165 mm
Buy
Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 229000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Mediamenta

sent on February 01, 2021

Pros: Rock solid fixed, very affordable price

Cons: Lampshade, weight, not very bright despite the texture and appearance

Opinion: Bought for a few euros, m42 and of course FF, practically universal, it is a little less sharp than the EF 200 f2.8 II L Canon and also the EF 70-200 f2.8 II L a TA, but perhaps with a review in assistance (30 neuri) could improve. Heavy, of obvious military approach. It seems to be made especially for those in Russia who are always wearing gloves and therefore care if it is cold to the touch. It has three rings but evidently the only one that counted was that of the focal length, extended moooooolto, while instead the focal opening resolves to a few degrees of angular variation, noisy, not at all comfortable: they seem to say "do not touch me on mission". This setting, this Siberian education, as a soldier with gloves, is visible precisely in the construction of the focal length ring: a grip never ambiguous, very fluid, very precise, of quality without uncertainty. Having said that it is a lens that can still say its in full light, it has little distortion as you can expect from this focal length. The lampshed is ridiculously small, but made especially so as not to be lost. Ultimately, having it or not having it does not change the life of those who make a talk of money immobilized in a drawer, and in the meantime it is there, waiting for its moment, like a faithful and not at all annoying dog, a little rustic.

Chebeltempo

sent on March 23, 2020

Pros: Construction, yield, cost.

Cons: Full-opening yield

Opinion: I must have some problems with Jupiter targets... is the second one I sell and buy back after repenting. Great construction, rather heavy optics, all metal. The full-opening yield, as per the tradition of optics former USSR, is a bit "flou", but, incredibly, it becomes excellent by closing the diaphragm a bit. Nothing to say, if it is a focal point that serves, for a short time you manage to have a respectable perspective and good build quality.

Alessandro Segat

sent on March 01, 2020

Pros: Great especially if you have apsc. To be bought along with a support ring and a lever to facilitate focus. With an extension tube you can also use it for macros. With a 2x on apsc it becomes a 600 even if you lose a bit of sharpness but a 600 to 150 euros I think you can't find it.

Cons: Don't use it backlight or you will make the disaster. Weigh so much bought support ring for lens and not machine.

Opinion: If one approaches telephoto lenses it's a great start. Also because having a 200 fixed to new f4 costs you the ir of Ddio Great especially if you have apsc. To be bought along with a support ring and a lever to facilitate focus. With an extension tube you can also use it for macros. With a 2x on apsc it becomes a 600 even if you lose a bit of sharpness but a 600 to 150 euros I think you can't find it.

Luca De Nardo

sent on November 19, 2019

Pros: Incredible construction, good photo yield, crisp, beautiful blurry, ridiculous price

Cons: Weight (it's a tank... all iron and glass) and no tressses attack. A little aberration

Opinion: Let's say. It's a 70s Russian lens.... military-derived. But it is a lens that, if you do not give it a euro, surprises in all respects. We also consider that it is prime lens ... it is only a 200mm with all the optical advantages that come with it (for others maybe a disadvantage, because it is inflexible). Clean, sharp, some chromatic imperfection in some optical conditions, but absolutely solvable. Nice built-in lampshade (at least in my version). yes, okay, it's heavy, and the lack of a tresscan attack affects, but... Guys... that slow. I mounted it on my sony (with the a6000 comes to 300mm and on the a7II). very satisfied. Considering that it is between 20 and 40 euros.... i don't add anything else.

Phshoot

sent on October 24, 2019

Pros: Photo quality, sharpness, blurry. Low price compared to other very expensive lenses. Photo results. M42 attack that mounts with adapters on almost everything. Built-in lampshade. Filter diameter 58 mm .

Cons: Absence of tripod attack and maybe only manual focus and weight, but to have excellent results, a little you have to suffer and it's worth it.

Opinion: I own this wonderful lens that I used first with adapter on a fuji xm-1, then on canon and then on sony-minolta. The results, from my point of view, are excellent. It detaches the subject very much from the background and has a very pleasant bokeh. in a manual is really fun and if you don't have to do photo shoots or special things, it leaves you time to take more thoughtful and different photos from the ones everyone does. Of course, the lens and the photographer are two different things, but this also matters a lot ! The weight may be the only one against, but if you take another 200 mm of excellent workmanship, they will certainly not be feathers. The pleasure of shooting with a lens like this, with a unique character, is an experience to try !

There are 8 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4

Butterfly on grass in my backyard

by Gagarose
29 comments, 5309 views

Butterfly

by Gagarose
26 comments, 3968 views

Sbrodolino

by Errevi
21 comments, 4439 views

Lucy

by Phshoot
19 comments, 2187 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Barlia robertiana

by Tore Serra
11 comments, 4345 views

The last poppies

by Coradocon
33 comments, 977 views

HI RES 13.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Rocca Calascio Startrail

by Egix90
11 comments, 1876 views

HI RES 11.4 MP

Chamomile? ...

by Errevi
11 comments, 2116 views

Turtledove

by Alessandro '70
6 comments, 2525 views

HI RES 12.6 MP

Triptych

by Coradocon
18 comments, 614 views

HI RES 17.7 MP

Colors

by Coradocon
21 comments, 652 views

HI RES 14.4 MP

Untitled Photo

by Pietro Mon
7 comments, 2068 views

Flowers

by Coradocon
20 comments, 651 views

HI RES 21.0 MP

Kiss

by Slashburns
5 comments, 1075 views

HI RES 12.6 MP

What a great lady2

by Slashburns
2 comments, 725 views

HI RES 12.6 MP

I had heavy ...

by Errevi
11 comments, 1620 views

Lucy

by Phshoot
4 comments, 921 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Objective test

by Mirc
17 comments, 427 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Felix

by Slashburns
5 comments, 958 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Alone in the Autumn

by AlessandroMosconi86
5 comments, 520 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

At sunset

by Laerte
3 comments, 1084 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by Slashburns
3 comments, 884 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Sympetrum fonscolombii & male;

by Ihackurmind
6 comments, 1200 views

HI RES 10.6 MP

Chasing the vanda

by Errevi
11 comments, 1476 views

Today I keep a very sore head ...

by Zillao65
10 comments, 2253 views

Cactus Flower Stolen

by Coradocon
26 comments, 710 views

HI RES 12.5 MP

Fedra

by Egix90
3 comments, 1010 views

Tulip

by Slashburns
5 comments, 745 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

What a fantastic little lady

by Slashburns
2 comments, 803 views

HI RES 12.6 MP

Untitled Photo

by Slashburns
5 comments, 791 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Amarillis

by Sofia9200
1 comments, 1009 views

HI RES 7.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Condominium meeting ..

by Marco Cristiano
6 comments, 865 views

I always look alert

by Egix90
2 comments, 701 views

Egret

by Sagyttar
6 comments, 344 views

Fedra

by Egix90
2 comments, 1430 views

Vintage

by Cast98
2 comments, 543 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

David Austin roses: Gentle Hermione

by Vigna88
11 comments, 2366 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Zenit » Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4

Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Jupiter 21M - 200mm f/4