|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Herbysteo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Herbysteo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: lightness, brightness from fixed, macro, noiselessness, compactness Cons: Non-tropicalized (at least rubber ring) Opinion: Bought on Amazon, tried in the first instance, behaves very well, does not mistake a shot and is extremely silent; Imperceptible stabilizer, blurred pleasing though at 35 may not have an effect like a medium tele. The macro mode is amazing, you really can get close to the subject and the focus is always accurate even if for convenience I prefer to work in manual since the R has the focus peaking. Even at the video level it behaves stupendously. You know, the focal 35 mm is the most used for street and combined with this body portability is the mistress! Too bad not to be weather sealed, but sure sure will create a L series in some time! sent on January 14, 2019 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: Innovative R system, compactness, weight, tropicalization, magnesium body, display, viewfinder, battery usage LP-E6, RAW quality Cons: Lack of second SD slot, stupid ON-OFF button, paid adapter (at least the base) Opinion: After a fairly intensive use but at amateur level, after then about three weeks of hacking, I can express my opinion. I come from 20 years in the world of Canon SLR, both low and professional, first film and then Digital and go to the system ML for me it was really a surprise. Not so much for the absence of the mirror (at the end you do not realize you have in hand an ML if not for the weight and size), but for the system R completely new in all! In previous bodies now I knew the position of the individual keys and in total darkness I could move without hesitation so I do not hide to have a little to learn to maneuver this machine, and especially to customize all its functions! The real discovery has been known that every key (or at least in 95%) is customizable and it is therefore possible to have to his taste the most used functions, even in my case for example the change of the ISO I can do in 3 different ways. I for example I set the bar (brand new) MF. N which is activated on request and the arrow left me immediately the 100 ISO while the right ISO in the car; Instead, the same bar has been set to scroll through the photos when viewing. The only drawback is that the internal viewer "duplicates" the external one, or after a click "show" the photo taken and then is unpathetic the cosa....si obvious by disabling the vision of the photo, but it is not even shown in the main display, if not once Pressed the specific key..... same thing applies to the menu that is shown in the viewer and if you then want to deactivate the sensor that automatically activates or deactivates the switch from the display to the viewfinder you will see forced to maneuver the menu exclusively from the viewfinder If set as Main..... In short, the news compared to a classic body reflex are several and really serves a bit of time, patience and memory to learn them at best. I am satisfied for now, the files are beautiful and better than a 5d4; I do not do videos but if I were to start then I would buy only a dedicated body like a GH5S or a A7S2..... I think they wanted to give the maximum with this body for the photographic use for which the video compartment suffers but this also happens with other "houses" . The button on-OFF is stupid because in my opinion could have another shape and maybe dedicate the same space for another key.... moreover in the dark you do not understand if it is on or off because it does not have a reference being all round so if you have the machine in stand by and In the dark you don't understand if it's on or off. Personal opinion.... The adapter ring in my opinion would have to include it in the box without extra charge, or at least with a minimum price.... €100 are so many for a ring without any function and to be able to use the same goals of Canon home. sent on January 02, 2019 |
 | Canon Adattatore Canon EF/Canon RF Pros: That is why it was thought to use all the Canon Optics Park; Tropicalized and that's good. Cons: Price Opinion: Bought new, mandatory choice for those who do not want to change lenses or have the opportunity to use EF lenses with the new body R. It had been possible maybe I would have assessed the purchase of the model with the function ring nut, but anyway it's fine..... I look forward The output of other RF lenses, for now the RF 24-105 is fantastic!! The adapter uses it with the mythical EF 135 L USM 2.0 and maintains all functions as well as rapidity. In the package there is its soft case that protects it when not in use. sent on January 02, 2019 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: FF low price, good grip, good joypad, Wi-Fi function, battery info Cons: 11 AF points are few Opinion: Before FF of my life, I come from a 600D and a 350D before (and a 30V to film) so I found myself in the wonder of a digital SLR to take pictures as film .... with the previous two because it does not was the finding of having a good quality. Shooting with the L series lenses for which the maximum and bright .... anyway so it is all too easy to get decent shots. Great Wi-Fi although I always used SanDisk Eye-Fi cards. The GPS function also personally do not use because it consumes a lot of battery! Excellent battery info function with memory type MAC address that identifies each battery actually recorded. Custom features beyond belief! Too bad because the GPS has the top cover and plastic ..... shame to have only 11 points AF.rnBuono remote shooting via the App!! RnConsigliata highly voting 9.5 sent on April 04, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Series L, sealing, 24-105 zoom large enough, useful for trips out of town Cons: F / 4, weight Opinion: Extreme L series I bought. Remarkable quality, very well built, weather sealed, lens hood as standard and with the stabilizer. To have as a handyman and if you do not have enough money to buy a 24-70 f/2.8 which would purchase just to have more light .... for the rest nothing to envy anyone because it admirable that covers focal lengths are useful for trips without charging of all the equipment. Used on a 6D FF cartoon then everything slightly open and distorts slightly to 24 compared with the 17-40 L at the same focal length! Vote, however, more positive than 8.5! sent on April 04, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Weight, L series, size, f / 4 at all focal lengths Cons: None Opinion: Purchased used for about 550 € I have to say that it is spectacular, used with my 6D FF then enjoy full use of the 17 mm wide-angle! Lightweight, weighs absolutely not when it is hung on the body throughout the day. AF very fast, it never fails! Money well spent, however, and holds the value to be used well. I would do it gladly purchase. Extra .... recommended to have in your kit! sent on April 04, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
