|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lorenzo_mc www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lorenzo_mc  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro Pros: Undeniable optical quality-bokeh-Build quality Cons: Massive Opinion: I bought the 17 PRO to use it in the "ceremony" work (weddings et similar) where the aperture 1.2 and the optical performance of absolute level offer that security necessary to work in peace. I like it, I really like it, beyond my expectations. Despite the maximum aperture of 1.2 it offers clearly higher performance than the F1 Premium version, 7 both as sharpness at TA and as resistance to glare and flare. Sturdy, sealed. The hood is very large but sturdy light and with blocco\\sblocco. button As for the lens hood... the only flaw is the size. Everything is relative obviously and especially and fortunately, in the m4\\3 you can opt for very small optics wanting. But for those who, like me, use the system as a single or main instrument, the advent of the PRO 1.2 series is really a godsend. They are not indispensable, but they certainly expand the possibilities of the system itself. I definitely recommend it to everyone who doesn't even have a FF. sent on June 29, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: Sharpness - Fast and accurate AF - robust and practical - tropicalized - close up Cons: I did not find it Opinion: A practical, robust, and reliable zoom. For me it is good on every m43 (maybe not on the E-PL series) I use it perfectly on the E-M10 with extra grip and even on Pen-F. Optically optimal for all diaphragms and focal points plus the solid and tropicalized construction. Manual-mechanical focus ring and button function are very useful. The minimum focal length of the lens allows close ups, a real handyman. In summary, a goal that I absolutely recommend and which I have never had to complain about. sent on November 23, 2016 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: sharpness - convenience - build quality - compactness Cons: hood bulky (but comfortable) Opinion: One of my favorites, this objective is robust, and is masterfully constructed in terms of absolutely excellent optical quality. Crisp and all apertures and focal. The function key is very convenient (I use it for the management of the AF point). Excellent also the focus ring with the ability to manually mechanically coupled switch (like all PRO Olympus). In short, if you can buy it is an excellent lens that has no weaknesses. Perhaps it would have been nice to have the stabilizer maybe to 150mm would help, but in general the 5 axes Olympus me has always been enough. I'd like a lens hood more compact and lightweight ... sent on November 23, 2016 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: aperture f2.8 - build quality Cons: flare Opinion: In my experience the 7-14 PRO is a zoom really successful. The quality of images produced is excellent, in addition to being clear also has a great microcontrato, higher than the 12-40 that has a flatter yield. The quality and solid construction are excellent and despite everything remains small and light enough in relation to the opening f2.8 which I consider essential on m43 format. I had the version 43 that besides being f4 was much bigger and heavier and I think optically lower. I also had the Nikon 14-24 f2.8 ... The only really negative aspect is the flare that occurs very easily, you have to be very careful in handling the frame. Normally, if I realize, I use your left hand to do the necessary shade to eliminate flare. Overall it is a great goal that is worth its price. For those who complain about excessive weight and dimensions, the system provides the excellent Panasonic f4 ... but I think a stop on m43 often makes a difference. sent on November 23, 2016 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 Pros: Compact - light but strong Cons: missing hood - Unclear in TA Opinion: If you like the 35mm as a handyman here is the goal for you. Compact, lightweight yet built solidly with the gem of the focus ring that moves back in manual-mechanical position with a lot of scale to work in iperfocale. Optical qualities are good, do not make a miracle, but overall a lens that offers consistent performance. Probably the best compromise between size-brightness-cost for equivalent 35mm m43 home. This is because the 20mm Panasonic is more compact, bright and sharp, but suffers most at the corners and mounted on Olympus bodies has a very slow AF. 17 F1.8 instead is lightning-fast and extremely precise in making fuoco.rnDifetto I noticed photographing at night and in the presence of point lights (candles) is the appearance of gost flare verdasti ... also a TA is not at the level of the other mZuiko purtroppo.rnIo I paid 300 euro (and now it is easy to find in this figure), but we'd spend more. Versatile and well-built, a good solution per the m43.rn sent on December 03, 2014 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness at all openings - contrast - soft bokeh - solid metal construction - fast AF Cons: lack hood - minimum distance MAF Opinion: Probably the best glass in the house m43. A lens excellent in every single aspect. The image quality of the m43 thanks to goals like this 75 F1.8 salt of a step. Images full, intense and if you want with all the bokeh you could want. If the 150mm equivalent do not scare you (and I do not see why, the 135mm is a classic of FF ...) you can get absolutely flawless images you'll find hard to attribute to a m43. I are very satisfied, I use it mainly in ceremonies for portraits distanza.rnLa construction is professional, clear and strong. Found that optically is almost perfect the only flaws are the lack of the hood that were to bring in support, maybe a cheaper plastic, but had to put it. Then I add that it would be m sorry a minimum distance of focus smaller. sent on December 03, 2014 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Robust - tropical conditions - Ergonomic - fast accurate AF - excellent stabilizer - EVF large and crystal clear Cons: the latest ISO 1600 - Battery Life Opinion: The best machine I've ever used and I have used many (D700 - D800 - D600 - M9 - Sony A7 - Fuji X-Pro1 etc. Etc.), It takes a bit 'of time and patience to figure out the m43 and above how to manage your files and if you have patience this E-M1 will repay you with excellent image quality, but above all with the ability to shoot anywhere, anytime. This is the jewel in the crown of a system that will not and can not offer the quality of a FF, the m43 is a system made to be light, handy and always ready for use thanks to its dimensions. The E-M1 is the first and currently only mirrorless really complete: AF fast and precise, the best image stabilization available today, build quality excellent, truly tropical conditions (better than the E-M5 I had before) completely customizable, perhaps rnUna machine too ... which I highly recommend to anyone looking for practicality, lightness and efficiency; anyone who is aware that the image quality is not the only thing imcarrier, especially since it's rather a good picture of a potentially excellent but not taken ... (because supermegareflex is at home in the cupboard). sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Sony A7 Pros: FF compact and economical Cons: AF slow and sometimes inaccurate - poor ergonomics - a few dedicated optics - quality body and setting entry-level Opinion: As for me, except for the image quality, this Sony A7 is a real disappointment. The AF is not able to provide decent performance, for both slow that for reliability. The car seems designed in Denmark, those of Lego. How is it possible to conceive un'ergomia with two wheels and shutter placed in this way remains a mystery. The choice of controls and customization of these is questionable. You can not directly change the point of focus. rnrnTanti defects and difettuci which together make a big disappointment. I would add that I have good experience for correctness of mirrorless, Leica M9, ??Fuji X-Pro, Olympus E-M5ecc. etc.. The ... Olympus E-M1 is light years ahead in every single aspect, except the image quality for the obvious disadvantage of the sensor m43.rnrnTornando the A7, for amateur use in complete relaxation can still be a good choice but for those who want to do something more ... better not! sent on May 13, 2014 |
 | Sony FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA Sonnar T* Pros: sharpness - low distortion - robust Cons: only f2, 8 - bulky Opinion: The use of Sony A7. Coming from Leica M9 and Leica lenses use the latter as a yardstick. This is definitely a lens 35 Sony discreet, razor sharp and with excellent optical correction of the distortion. Very high contrast, perhaps too much, but with a pleasing bokeh anyway. For the rest instead is little more than enough. If we consider that only f2, 8 (a project then definitely not extreme) has a vignettattura excessive as well as sizes. Probably the Sony is having some trouble getting the NEX attack and draw the short and the coverage FF. To confirm this is the 35 f2, 8 is 28-70 zoom lens actually have the rear far from the sensor. In particular, the zoom, an optical seems to "reflex" with built-in adapter ring. Returning to the 35 f2, 8 would conclude by saying that undoubtedly can produce excellent results, it seems well built and feels solid. Scepticism is only in relation to the opening price and only f2, 8. rnp.s. I would add that the lens hood is acelutamente unwatchable. sent on March 28, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
