|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pigi47 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pigi47  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 24-105 mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Image quality, autofocus, stabilization, silent, control ring, at f4 satisfactory blurred, color rendering. Cons: At the moment nothing. Opinion: After some vicissitudes that the old EF 24/105 gave me, such as twice Error 01 or communication error with the camera. Cleaned the contacts the notice was always present. Sent for repair I was told that the communication flat ie the cable was broken. Repaired, unfortunately after 7 months I had the same problem to guarantee the repair now expired. At this point I decided to pour on the optics in question. After several photos I have to observe that there is a difference in response with the old EF of course on the same R6. Starting from the chromatic aberration, there is a clear improvement compared to the previous one. The focus is fast and precise, while the colors are vivid and contrasted. In the excursion of the focal length at least in this I did not find any game and not even as I read an annoying noise. What I greatly appreciated not only has the lock button, but above all the lens remains fixed to the focal length used for shooting every time you observe the photo taken on the display, while before it tended to move on the longer focal length, which is annoying if you had to repeat the shot. Useful is the programmable ring on the barrel. In my opinion a very good all-rounder. sent on September 10, 2023 |
 | Canon EOS R6 Pros: Deadly autofocus, dynamic range, burst both mechanical and electronic, dual slots, RF / EF adapter, stabilizer, ergonomics rather good for my hands, excellent sensor. Cons: RF lens price, lack of screen on camera shoulder Opinion: The moment I started using it I had a bad feeling, that is a moment before the focus and consequently the shot I saw in the viewfinder a light like a flash shot. Fortunately, after asking for an explanation on the forum, some courteous people dispelled my doubts by explaining the normality of the operation due to the total opening of the diaphragm to help the AF. Of course this lasted a blink of an eye. Having clarified this, it must be said that the photos are taken correctly and the focus is also valid using EF optics. Excellent and functional face / eye recognition once hooked the subject does not lose it anymore. More than enough bursts with mechanical and electronic shutter. I had the whole series of 5D and frankly once I took the hand with the new camera at the moment I do not regret them, although to be honest I kept the latest version. sent on January 27, 2023 |
 | Canon 5D Mark IV Pros: For now only positive things Cons: I read about raw files not excellent, personally I see them vouchers possibly recoverable in pp. Opinion: I did the whole 5D scale up to KIII which because of me fell off the easel and the repair cost more than the market value. I was fought between the R6 and the 5D MKIV in the end I chose the latter because of the ease of use knowing most of the functions. I find the focus fast and safe and the display view just as good. Comfortable touch. I would generally use it for macro photos both with the 100 f2.8 Canon and with the 180 f2.8 Sigma I would say perfect. I did other tests with 70/200 and 24/105, in all cases I found the result very valid. In a nutshell from what I could test even if it has not been in my hands for many days, I am totally satisfied. sent on May 08, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
