|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Franlazz79 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Franlazz79  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic GX9 Pros: Great camera, fast enough, good IQ and full of features and customizations Cons: Too similar to the GX80 that costs half... Opinion: I waited a bit as it is right for this assessment and then I decided, the GX9 is ultimately a great car but with mediocre features. Let me explain, has so many things less than G9, including much less performing stabilization, previous generation autofocus and various features only 4k and not 6k as the flagship, but in the end if we look at the market, for the sensor that mounts offers so much and the substance There is. The only flaw that remains is the GX80 at a price too good and with many of the functions of the GX9. sent on September 15, 2018 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Elmarit 200mm f/2.8 OIS Pros: An excellent optics from all points of view: construction, autofocus, optical quality Cons: All the limits of the fixed optics with respect to the zoom as to flexibility Opinion: Exceptional lens in terms of build quality and performance, a perfect contrast on the entire frame already at F2,8 with all the features typical of a professional tele at the constructive level. To say exceeds in my opinion the 70-200 F2,8 is II of Canon both at the level of construction and optical quality. A product maybe a little too expensive where they could to sell it better to put even the Teleconverter 2x in addition to the already present 1.4. For the size that covers maybe F2,8 is not bright and an F2 at that price could have been there. sent on August 10, 2018 |
 | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: When you find a perfect specimen and you do not need assistance worth Cons: Some specimens may not be perfect, and if you have trouble assistance is not up. Opinion: The lens itself in terms of characteristics would not be bad but unfortunately the specimens have some variability that combined with assistance outside Italy and a long time can give a lot of discomfort. My last example (Canon) had blocked the diaphragm and was made 45 days in return for repair with screws screwed bayonet bad (not mounted the lens). I refused to withdraw it and I ordered a Canon 16-35. Third parties should not only improve the characteristics as they did but treat more production in terms of tolerances and make real the guarantees they offer, it is useless to declare four years warranty proud and then keep the optics for a month and a half leaving them back that does not mount. sent on April 10, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Crisp, Fast, Reliable Cons: Weight, Price Opinion: After doubts and towards the end I opted for the 70-200 2.8 IS II making the Tamron 70-200 VC, the latter in many ways made it so good as the harrier but looks reliability made me face the outlay necessario.rnIl advantage of this view is its performance in terms of IQ linked to speed and accuracy (as long as everything is calibrated properly), it not only produces excellent images but always puts the focus where you say and do it quickly even in low light, something the competition does with equal dexterity, in addition stabilizes silently and effectively ensuring a regular stop on average recuperati.rnUn last crucial aspect concerns the sharpness at f2.8 this as on other optical f4 or more and the constancy of this sharpness at all focal lengths, where instead other 150 to 200 are more morbidi.rnConsiglio this objective to those who got tired of compromises and want the very best of these focal! sent on December 21, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Price / performance ratio and sharpness really top Cons: Canon of the focus in AI servo on 5DIII not have the same response that the Nikon AF-C for the lens in low light loses efficiency. Also on 5DIII stabilization intervenes too late compared to the maf and sometimes abruptly here risking some shots. Opinion: I had both the version that Nikon and Canon to this point I was 100% happy with the first and only 80% from the second, in fact, I find the sector focus of 5DIII a bit 'limited by the speed of the lens in the maf and also points out that in establishing an intervention too laggard compared to the focus as well as a little 'brusque. Afte tried different scenarios have always promoted the Nikon version while I found in obvious difficulty version Canon theater and shows with few lights and only artificial. Eventually I went to Canon L, surely for excessive fussiness but I found irritating certain limits mainly because the lens of her is outstanding and in normal conditions perhaps puts Canon and Nikon. Nikon straconsigliato on Canon to evaluate the use and the camera body on which to use it. For the price performance perhaps the best on the market. sent on December 17, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
