|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Davide Zonta www.juzaphoto.com/p/DavideZonta  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 100D Pros: Value for money, and touchscreen sensor aps-c best of 7d Cons: For what it costs anyone. Opinion: I have the 100d for 2 year (not from 2 days .....) and I think I can say that as a value for money there is little that can match it. RNLA advice and those who want to approach the way SLR and those who already have an important kit. RNLA first consideration is that the 100d is not 'an entry level SLR as the 1200d but it' s definitely a superior product, just think that you can use with all Canon lenses (including the various bianconi) .rnIl my kit sees also a 5D3 and a 1dmk4, the 100d I had taken for my wife but its features lead me to never to travel with both the FF with the aps-h but choose one of the two in combination with the small canon that use without any problem with the various 100-400 or 70-200 2.8, but also with the 400 f2.8 is.rnE 'a product recommended. sent on January 03, 2016 |
 | Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro Pros: 16-300 focal range, light, crisp, short distance focusing. Cons: read AC in shots with strong contrast. Opinion: After twenty days of use, I can say with tranquility 'that have not regretted having sold the Canon 28-300L and that he bought the Tamron 16-300 ..... I was puzzled because' the 16 to produce an article as 300 is not 'simple thing, I was expecting a lot more' compromises, but in the end I must say that if it is bought for what it is intended to do is definitely not a bad choice because lente.rnL'ho with a kit I needed a very structured product that would give me a good zoom range with a weight content (content for those who use SLR ....) rnLe my outings are often aimed at hunting and photographic macro, fixed that often go with the 1.5 kg, so 'it was difficult to as a handyman who was inside the backpack 28-300L (another 1.7 kg) .rnCon the 16-300 I created a kit that allows me to be very light but not to give up much of what gives me the kit done heavy artillery. The use in coupled with the sigma 12-24, 90 macro, and the whole mounted on 400f5,6 100d (see machine that ideal with 16-300), all in about 3 kg.rnPer as riguarda to specifications I find the 100D with the 16-300 an extremely balanced, the af is not 'the L-series but it anyway and' fast and accurate, the stabilizer does its job pretty well, finishing outside the considered type of product is in my opinion very good, given the lens hood supplied is a plastic and a thickness decisamnete which I think is better than the one provided by the Tamron 24-70 2.8 vc.rnUna consider extremely personal view is that this lens (like other lenses of this type) is a lens that you have to learn how to use ...... let me explain better, being a compromise in everything is easy in the beginning not to be satisfied with the results, and 'logical that the search for some shots should be much more 'weighted using that lens specialist, if one wants to make portraits of the lenght of 85mm will not have to' wonder if it blurred the Tamron is not 'one of the canon 85 F1.8 ..... if one wants to macro (function and characteristic present in 16-300) will not have to 'stupiri if the macro made with the Sigma 180 2.8 os and' better .... etc..etc.., but I can guarantee that with some care you can get some good out of focus and macro interessanti.rnCredo in conclusion that Tamron for value / prezzzo has proposed an extremely valid, but where 'and' important utilizzarolo and make a pochina experience before judging it. I decree a gallery in my profile where I'm going 'to include some images taken with the 16-300 in jpg without any processing. sent on August 19, 2014 |
 | Olympus Stylus 1 Pros: Compact, 28-300 zoom, a lot of possibility 'of personalization, electronic viewfinder valuable, stabilizer impressive. Cons: Sensor size, noise above 1000 iso, battery life. Opinion: I took this Olympus Stylus 1 a few days ago, I got it for the simple reason that encompasses many of the features that a compact should have, the dimensions are not micro - compact, but for me this is' an advantage in the sense that in any case gives you the feeling you are holding an object of a certain size, finishes and materials are very good, the viewfinder and 'exceptional and yield 100% great advantages, zoom and' fast and can 'be controlled both left or to the right dell'obiettivo.rnLa 1 stylus can 'be customized in all its functions, I downloaded already' some images to video views are, however, understand the potential 'of this prodotto.rnPPer as concern for the defects first thing I sensor would have liked a slightly more 'great, but I think it is already' a kind of small miracle to be able to put in a camera body so small all the features of this little Olympus, another defect noise you've 'heard by 640 iso , but I think with a little pp can improve a lot the results, the battery is not dutherefore very ra 'recommend buying one of scorta.rnNei coming days postero' few clicks to confront in the quality 'of essi.rnrnIntervengo to insert a new account after doing more tests' series with the Stylus1, I am really satisfied with this compattona I did a test comparing the Olympus stylus1 with canon 100d (aps-c) and 70-200 2.8 is II, practically David against Goliath, however, to just below 1600 iso the two machines and the two lenses can be compare, this does not mean that they are similar, but that you can make a paragone.rnHo then made a pass at the Olympus LR file and in any case at the level of noise you retrieve molto.rnPoco I wrote above that the noise began to feel toward the 640 iso, this is true but comparing it to a file of the 5D3 result is merciless, but comparing it to 800iso with the file of the 100d I can safely say that there is no 'distance in kilometers .... sent on July 21, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Unique, construction, good results for the characteristics of the lens Cons: Heavy, expensive, cumbersome. Opinion: I think that's the lens that I prefer, let's see if I can explain .... in all its focal you can find better (and less money) but all together you will not find anything like it. For me and 'the aim to bring always on the go but when I put in the bag I try to convince myself that I'll use it ..... then eventually use it in 90% of the photos .... rnIo personally hate to keep changing optical and the 28-300L and the problem 'solved, I use it both on aps-c on both aps-h but the maximum from it on FF where you can really leave all the rest, I did travel with the 28-300L + 50f1.4 + 90macro2.8, the last two used only in special situations, and the 28-300L always mounted. sent on June 30, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
