|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Chiccochrys www.juzaphoto.com/p/Chiccochrys  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Great to TA, great value - price, excellent construction. Cons: Motor STM is not perfect Opinion: I made a small and great Christmas gift for the purchase price, I think, there is no better. Excellent construction, size, then let you have it in your pocket. Great af 2.8, where also gives one blurred pleasant. The only drawback is the engine STM, I was impressed by the system to focus on the canon 10-18 STM, while here has a few drawbacks as: speed nell'agganciare the subject (still good) and "hiss" heard in the recordings. To conclude, I would just advise the objective in question, it deserves a great vote ....:-) sent on December 15, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Lightweight, "cheap", stabilized, good yield, af quiet and lightning Cons: Low resistance to flare Opinion: I'm using it now for a month or so, maybe not for what he was born to, or for the panoramic photos, but I must say that behaves really well, the range of focal lengths allows you to create very original compositions. The sharpness is good, with a slight post production you can pull off great photos. The Af scares (positive) combined with the 70d you do not even notice that engages the subject if not for the beep. :-) Now I have to start using it in the right way ...:-) but the feelings are positive, for what it costs him straconsiglio. sent on September 16, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price / quality Cons: Unclear ATA and Af noisy (* after testing more) Opinion: I align to the previous reviews, for what it costs is fine but it is not always leave a lens attached to the SLR. For me, however, the value for money is good unless you think to exploit only at RT. Closing one two stops in fact, the overall quality increases, you can get excellent portraits, the focus is good in my opinion and keeping higher speeds (less time) increases detail and nitidezza.rn * With the 70d I noticed, which I had not seen instead with the 600d, which in 1.8 you can get great pictures while keeping times of less than 1/250. sent on May 07, 2014 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: Ergonomics, readiness, colors, sharpness, touch, wifi Cons: If we must find, I would have preferred to have the second SD slot Opinion: I state that I do not have a lot of experience but I can make a comparison with the machines that I could try (not many) that used was a 600d and the comparison seems to be a lifetime ago, the reactivity of 70d is truly spectacular Af engages the subject in a lightning even in less than perfect lighting conditions, the burst then does the rest, I like to create many GIF and AI SERVO mode with 99% of the photo is in sharp focus. Regarding the ISO (for me) are good up to 1600 then if you increase the noise becomes more obvious but can be easily corrected with a few clicks of PP seen the end grain of the files. The video function (I use a little) but it remains open mouth, a camera, I did some testing and the swivel screen .... woow ... I had already tried (very useful), but I missed the touch, phenomenal, when you get used to doing all the built-in wifi is a boon in many circumstances, especially having trees near the house, comfortably sitting at the computer and look at the picture-takingin the nests of birds and more, but the battery goes down quickly. I would have preferred to finish as I said the second SD slot helpful but not fondamentale.rnDopo have done many more tests, then more experience with the 70d I changed my mind on holding ISO, for me, the JPG that churns out the car, setting the noise reduction, are really good even at ISO 5000 and acceptable in 8000. sent on May 06, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
