|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Davfree www.juzaphoto.com/p/Davfree  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: weight, sharpness price Cons: no one saw the price .. Opinion: unique perspective that has followed me in step a d800 several years ago ... that is great for the price is sharp loses some 1.8 but still usable, weighs nothing has always defended well does not make me regret not having 1.4 also because I do not do photo work, and I will not be spending more than double for the 50 1.4 sent on February 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: comfort Cons: vignetting, distortion and price Opinion: optical socket recently, used in a couple of long walks, definitely convenient as focal coverage from 24 to 120 removed the photograph animals we do everything and can lead to several pictures home with convenience and variety of angles of shooting, surely the just out of the machine files it needs some tweaking as vignetting and increase the sharpness but nothing that does not recover with just a few clicks .... rnovviamente you should not expect the neatness and cleanliness of the fixed image, but those often I lost a few shooting since I wanted / I could not bring along all focal or could not change perspective, perhaps in equilibrium at some critical point ... rncome sharpness is still acceptable even in portraits, it's not a knife but a beautiful image of fullness and a good blurry .rnMa i must admit i do not know if i would have got back to full price of over 1000 euro are far too many ... i also had the sigma 24-105 that from what recourse was actually more crisp and less lost at the edges but the nikon is more convenient since that comes to 120 and prefer the shade of color that restituisce sent on February 15, 2017 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Pros: strong, sharp Cons: flare, very convex lens which does not allow the use of standard filters Opinion: done really well, by the sense of solidity immediately, especially very sharp in the center, loses hair when used in 2.8, against the light but suffers just pay attention to where the sun is framed for the rest I thought it was great, but distortion at the sides for a normal focal length to 11, 16 I used it for portraits and the distortion was controllabilissima sent on December 03, 2013 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: versatile today than a few years ago 'money, with the right lenses known to be pretty sharp, and the body has many functions and buttons within easy reach of some higher-end machines Cons: noise above 800 ISO usable up to 1600 ISO but losing detail Opinion: I used it for 4 years in all situations from the intense cold, the heat, has always defended superbly giving many shots clean and detailed. relatively compact to carry around, but with a body quite comfortable to hold, with various features of its bigger brother, as the possibility of flash and fill in the little things that for years I did not feel the need to change the camera body, in favor of a D300 d7000 or, in short, a car for those who want to start spending a hair more but knowing that for various time remain satisfied with the shopping, now "dated" but it is located at an advantageous price for the pixels are not too many ili day today but already with 50 1.8 allows generous crop, I cabiata only in favor of a D800 for more fatto.rnla I would not focus fast and accurate, perhaps suffers a little in the dark, but now I'm used to that of the D800 and I might be accustomed too well sent on December 03, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
