|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alessandro Pellizzari www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlessandroPellizzari  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: good construction, good stabilizer, good quality image Cons: autofocus embarrassing, hood ciofeche Opinion: I comply with this objective by about 3 days (for which relatively little) taken to replace the SIGMA 24 70 f2.8 EX DG MACRO. When I was deciding whether or not to give into the sigma I preferred to hold it, given the limited economic value that was attributed to possibly exchange them fixed focus that I will have to buy in the near future. As holder of the second optical focal hand why not dabble in a confrontation? and so I did. Well it turned out that the good old sigma is less than the new Tamron only for a slight less accurate detail on the edge of the image and a bit of chromatic aberration in più.rnCome I expressed in against the Tamron AF Ultrasonic against AF noisy and mechanical SIGMA was significantly slower (test canon 6d midpoint) tamron effort to "catch" spending himself in an awkward back and forth while sigma: Bzzzz ... caught! Hood: we put aside the speech plastic poor light ... etc etc ... I tried a aggancI quickly with extended barrel 70 mm and I was literally stuck ring on the barrel ... as they say in my part: DO NOT GO !! PAROE (Trans .: are so upset by it that I have no words to describe the situation) rnStabilizzatore, construction and image quality are definitely three points in favor of TAMRON but the store made me kindly try also the CANON 24 70 f2.8 USM II ...... and there's history .... 1000 euros more but so much more quality. Too bad not having :-( sent on May 22, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: all Cons: no one Opinion: I had to buy this perspective a bit 'reluctantly because of a job that required a good angle so that I, the owner of the modest tammino 10-24, and not particularly fond of "large spaces in a small space" I went to the store and I did the acquisto.rnSono very satisfied, and I think I have not supplied a perspective much sharper than this. A 16 mm feel to almost fill the entire frame ... of details. Not to mention the stabil ... pardon ... strabiliantizzatore ... a manna.rnConsigliatissimorn sent on December 21, 2014 |
 | Benro A0690TBH00 Pros: Lightweight and compact Cons: No hooks, loading above 2.5 kg better that there is no wind Opinion: I purchased this tripod to Istabul during a trip the day before going to visit the Topkapi Palace where I knew I would need for sure, but you have me, I seized the entrance (do not tell the incazzatura !!). Paid, in the physical store, the price of 110 euro, it was immediately comfortable and light ... travel short. RNLA workmanship is excellent and the ergonomics as well. Perhaps the head supplied is not the best but for a newcomer who goes bene.rnMesso compared with the corispettivo Manfrotto (by price, size, and invoice) there was confronto.rnUnica mishap caused by my lack of experience, to block one leg I turned the screws of the clamp on the contrary too .... and my leg was removed in the middle of a canyon with water in the knees ... heheh ... no longer successo.rn sent on September 26, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
