|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giordano Santini www.juzaphoto.com/p/GiordanoSantini  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Good focal excursion - (almost) all-rounder - fast- good sharpness Cons: lacks lampshade - limited brightness (3.5 - 5.6) but understandable, proportionate to price Opinion: I use it mainly in the mountains but I had the opportunity to use it also on the road and solves most situations. the sharpness is appreciable despite not being an L-series lens. It has a considerable weight but is understandable for the type of optics. It has a good stabilization and for me that I take it to the mountains is indispensable (difficult to carry an easel for hours...) - Maybe it distorts a little to the extreme wide angle but you have to consider that it is not a specific goal. Overall in my opinion it deserves a "9" vote sent on June 22, 2020 |
 | Canon 90D Pros: lightning, burst, reliability- battery life Cons: nothing in particular -- maybe high iso estate -- Opinion: I used it in the mountains with snow situations and I have to say that the colors seem well balanced - I got to use it at the end of December on a trip to Iran - the subjects were different in type and lights sometimes at a minimum but I have to say that I never had problems - the f Iles are all too big (32 MP) - but this allows you to crop when the situation does not allow you to make the optimal cut - what to say, I had, and I still have the 70d of which I am very happy, this I think is a natural evolution but maybe also something more - I will have the right to use it in other situations hoping that it will always give me satisfaction... of course mirrorless, especially for young people will be the future. maybe some new features will be mixed between reflex and mirrorless - I'm using it with 18-135 usm, with 70-200 f4 is, with sigma 17-70 and I'll use it with the 100-400 II sent on January 16, 2020 |
 | Canon 1200D Pros: Basic reflex but with the necessary functions valid Cons: ISO Estate But nothing particular considering the cost Opinion: I took it a few years ago as a second room and I must say that I carry it unpretentious. About 3 years ago I took a shot in the mountains with snow mounting the 18-135 STM and I must say that the result was excellent. The burst is not to be considered as other limits of functions but nevertheless it behaves more than good for the basic photography and anyway the sensor is good. Considering the value for money could deserve almost a 9. sent on August 22, 2018 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Practical and bright (good focal excursion) Cons: Nothing in particular Opinion: I got it at the beginning of the year (for having "lost" the Canon 17-55 2.8)-Actually I forgot it for a little in a site in the mountains and when I got back on the spot it was gone-I'd say almost there, this is also lighter-for now I have used it for landscapes both mountain CH And to the sea in addition to some portrait and I would say that fits well for every situation the colors I find balanced-I use it on Canon 70 D- sent on July 09, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: suitable for many situations, useful traveling - sharp images and very manageable Cons: apart, hood not supplied find none Opinion: use it for more than four years on the road but also in the mountains and also good for portraits. And light and therefore very usable freehand. The aperture of f4 does not make me regret the version 2.8 as outdoor believe not experience any major differences in compensation costs almost half. To close range the blurred you get is nice and I found the image always sharp. sent on December 22, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
