|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maurizio Junior Gabbi www.juzaphoto.com/p/MaurizioJuniorGabbi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Patona 4in1 Pros: Versatile, economical, small and light Cons: Charging time, battery life supplied Opinion: I use it for a year, bought on Amazon kit with battery for Canon 60D. Really very practical and versatile, it offers the opportunity to charge the battery via 220V outlet, cigarette lighter, USB and micro USB. When I leave the house I always keep it in the bag thanks to its small dimensioni.rnI loading times are definitely higher than those of the original charger, and you should keep it plugged a few minutes more than the green end of charge. Battery life in the kit is less than originale.rnNonostante small defects recommend it for convenience and cost very competitive: excellent quality / price ratio! sent on September 19, 2015 |
 | Benro C2692T Pros: Weight, capacity, versatility, supplied Cons: No problems found Opinion: I use it for over a year with head B1 and I'm very satisfied. RNLA build quality is quite high, with solid materials, excellent assembly and good finishes. Very simple also disassemble for cleaning in the case of sand, dust or altro.rnE 'tripod luggage, lightweight, compact and very fast movements with the immediate opening and closing. Despite this it provides excellent stability: with the head B1 mount Canon 60D + 1.8 Sigma 18-35, for a total of about 1.6Kg without any problem, even if holding quietly optical bodies and much heavier. It 'also provided with hook for hanging the bag and increase the stability. rnPersonalmente really appreciate the locking rings, which allow opening and closing very rapide.rnUna leg is removable and can be used as a monopod (or cane) .rnLa standard equipment is extensive: feet with metal tip (really useful certain cases), short column (does not allow the closure to the minimum volume, butturning the head, you can enter the stand in his bag), Allen key, soft bag (with shoulder and two handy pockets inside), knob with compass (to be mounted on the leg that you unscrew) .rnL'ho used in different situations, the snowy Alps (where carbon does not cool as aluminum) to the tropical heat of Madagascar never have the slightest problem. An excellent investment, definitely recommend it to those who prefer a light tripod without giving up too much stability. sent on September 19, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: AF, stabilizer, quality / price ratio, focal length Cons: Sharpness at RT and over 200mm, construction Opinion: I use it for about a year on APSC (Canon 60d), mainly for racing. rnCome said, has a quality / price ratio really high. rnLe plastics are not the best to be honest, but you have to take into account that it costs about 300 €! The focus ring is not very smooth, but using it to 99% in AF is not an issue. The zoom ring is better, although in my example is a bit 'too soft at the end of the race. The lens hood is made rather bene.rnPer regard to optical performance, a TA sharpness is not the best, but close enough to a stop to get the best results. Using it often for panning, I have big problems from this point of view. RNA my opinion, the quality remains good up to 200mm, beyond which begins to knead too much detail. rnDavvero excellent stabilizer, which offers a great advantage especially for those who, like me, uses it on APSC. rnL'AF is quite fast, although a bit 'noisy as already shown in other recensioni.rnIn conclusion: for mie needs (car racing) is beginning to be tight for sharpness and AF, although I managed to get some good pictures. In my profile, you can find some for track use. I'm still satisfied, and highly recommend it if you are looking for a tele stabilized by the good performance and do not have a large budget. sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, weight and size, color rendering, materials, stabilizer, AF Cons: Price hood, sharpness at TA Opinion: I use it with a lot of satisfaction from approximately 6 months of APSC (60d). Got it used, but practically new from a member of the forum because I wanted a normal focal and fell in love with the fissi.rnL'ottica is very compact and lightweight, but the plastics are good. RNLA sharpness at 2.8 is not the best, but close enough if only one stop to get spotless images. The center of the frame offers great sharpness, but also on the sides there is a decay so obvious. The colors offer a good saturation, but at the same time are delicate and balanced. The AF is very fast, and allows the stabilizer, as stated by Canon, to recover up to 4 stops. On APSC is really a great advantage. Resistance to flare is good but not phenomenal for this (and for greater protection) I bought the original lens hood, at a discounted rate for luck: it is really expensive, but built with good materials; the attachment button is quick, safe and of good quality, and the inside of the petals is covered with velluto.rnAberrazione chromatic much reduced, even in conditions of strong contrast. rnMolto satisfied with your purchase, definitely recommended! sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: Focal length, stabilizer, speed AF Cons: Sharpness, brightness, resistance to flare, construction, AC Opinion: Objective taken in kit with 60d, taking a few months and resold. RNE 'a good lens to learn as it offers a decent quality (although the last 18-55 is better) and has a great excursion focale.rnQuest'ultima would make a good handyman to travel, to keep the machine in the morning in the evening so as not to take too many weights, but the brightness is very poor and forced him to raise the ISO on APSC .. and .... well, not the best .. RNA 17mm distortion is quite important, but since it can take on LR with a few clicks. Rather resistance to flare is very poor, and even the AC is rather less fastidiosa.rnLa thing that ticked me off is maybe the sharpness, nothing exceptional (although in the printing results are not bad). Really great stabilizer, which allows you to retrieve something that is lost with the low light. Very well the AF, really fast. rnih synthesis: the new price is definitely too high. I took it in kit only for convenience, but I would not consigliarlo at full price. sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Sigma 10mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM Diagonal Fisheye Pros: Sharpness in the center, very fast AF (too much for the type of optical!), A minimum distance of focus, build quality, color saturation, brightness, accommodation gelatin filters, and all the creative possibilities that offers a fisheye! Cons: Sharpen the edges (but on a lens like that there is), chromatic aberration, flare (again, pretty normal for a fish), price Opinion: I use it with satisfaction for about a year. At first it is weird to look through the viewfinder, you open an entirely different world, and I think it takes a little 'time to get the hang of: it is the first time you use a fisheye in fact I think we need a little' practice to understand the possibilities and limitations, discounted penalty to photo / forced / etc. Once there is familiar with the type of lens, really offers a lot of creative possibilities, in the most diverse (I have several photos in your profile that witness). rnIl Sigma is shown immediately built with good materials: plastics are robust, and its compact design, the lens is very heavy. rnInterruttore AF / MF "hard" and well done, but by click a little 'plasticky; ring focus long, smooth and progressive. Allows full time mf.rnL'AF is, as I mentioned, very fast, too, for a fisheye Whereas a moment just close the aperture to have almost everything in focus. As I pointed out in the pros, has a distance of focusing very small, about 3cm fromt the front lens, which allows you to give free rein to their creativity with shots really unusual! Of course, a 3 cm from the subject to TA, even for a fisheye the depth of field is reduced a lot, and at that point the AF comes in handy. rnOttima brightness, which allows creative shots even at night or in low light conditions (in particular photos events / holidays) .rnLa optical performance is very good: excellent sharpness at the center, which obviously fell short on the sides and in the corners, where also the perspective distortion becomes important, however. I tend to keep the subject in the center, but then it depends on what you want to achieve. rnLe images, however, have a very nice three-dimensionality. I have tried other fisheye images instead they gave me more "flat". rnAnche color rendition is excellent: no feedback dominant particularly aggressive, and the colors are very saturated, so much so that at times seems almost to have a polarizer built! rnPurtroppo, chromatic aberration is quite strong: in most cases, andliminabile with Lightroom in a few clicks, but in strong contrast becomes a bit 'more mangy. rnAnche the flare can be bothersome, especially in the shots at night. rnCome said there is also a slot for gelatin filters in the back: personally I've never felt the need, although I would be curious to try them. In the case, I will update the review! ,) RnPer Finally, the price is actually a bit 'high, but offers excellent quality. For APSC in this category, however, is the best lens in my opinion. sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: price, sharpness, brightness Cons: materials, noise, slow AF Opinion: For a very low price, it is a good way to start to familiarize yourself with the fixed lenses. Sure, the building is really bad, completely made of plastic (including base), but if you want a super bright without wanting to spend a lot, is a price to pagare.rnL 'autofocus is very slow, and in low light conditions often struggles to connect the soggetto.rnOffre good sharpness, especially in the center, and a good bokeh effect, which makes it great for ritratti.rnPersonalmente, even for its lightness and compactness, always bring him back (I use it on aps-c). rn sent on December 21, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
