RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Dario87
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dario87



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Dario87


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_35_f2Canon EF 35mm f/2.0

Pros: Lightness, brightness, price, sharpness.

Cons: Af noisy

Opinion: I bought this lens used and I must say that is really all there, will definitely not be the equal of the more famous and more expensive lenses but I like it so much, I did not think that would give me so much satisfaction, it will also old and outdated but for what costs we can not have più.rnLa sharpness of Ta is already good, the bokeh is good, it is also extremely light and compact, you can easily keep in your pocket, we say it is a sort of twin of the "big brother" Canon 50 1.8 II ( if we put them close are virtually identical), but the 35 has its favor has the quality of construction, Bayonet and metal scale distanze.rnLo highly recommend it to all who want to have a perspective a little bit shorter than the traditional 50 and do not want to spend madness.

sent on October 26, 2013


sigma_50_f1-4Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Pros: Sharpness, construction, blurred, resistance to flare

Cons: Weight, exemplary problems with F / B focus

Opinion: I have a bit 'of time this lens, with which I am very well, I got it to replace the Canon 50 1.8 II, and needless to say it is another world, I am informed well before you buy it and at the end of the 'I did it and I can not be super satisfied, sharpness already TA, but it exceeds 2.8 up, practically a blade, excellent focus, the' Af is good, although it is a bit pesantuccio to be a fixed, 1.4 you are likely more than a few times cannare focus but which opening there is, and still just slightly close to resolve, shame that there are around a few copies that are suffering from f / b focus must be fortunati.rnNon know if is higher than the rival Canon, but to me I really like this lens, great for portraits.

sent on October 26, 2013


canon_650dCanon 650D

Pros: Af fast, maneuverable, monitor, battery

Cons: None for the moment

Opinion: I'm almost a year I own this camera body, with which I am very well, the speed of focus is good, it is very easy to handle, is very resistant to Iso (certainly not as a FF), I spettavo worse and instead I was stupid, good burst and good also the duration of batteria.rnE 'my first camera body and for the moment the only, and I can only give good ratings, I articulated screen is very convenient and also in touch some occasions it is faster than traditional buttons, for me I use little or nothing, the quality of materials is good and has a nice grip, perhaps with a Bg would be even better but it should be at the expense of portability, runs excellent video but honestly I have not taken for that reason. RNLA advice for those embarking on the first time the world of photography, is an "entry level" even though I rate this a shade above this category.

sent on October 26, 2013


canon_50_f1-8_v2Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Pros: Price, brightness, sharpness

Cons: Af slow and noisy, it is made entirely of plastic

Opinion: Lens that for the price it costs is really good, I got to photograph portraits and close-ups and I must say that I was blown away by the quality of the photos that can churn out, of course you can not expect to have a professional lens in hand , considering the price, the bokeh is sufficient but a little hard, the focus slowly, Ta is blurry, 3.5 becomes very clear and it is a knife, I replaced it with the Sigma 50 1.4 which is another world, but also costs 4 times as much, the advice to those traveling on a budget but needs a fixed lens and bright, but also very very light.

sent on October 26, 2013


canon_efs_18-55is_v2Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

Pros: Price, lightness

Cons: Sharpness, focus, brightness, construction

Opinion: And I found in the lens of my Canon 650D kit, it certainly has many good points but also against it, starting with the sharpness that is excellent but all in all good, the brightness is very poor, the focus slow and imprecise , is a good "do everything", minimum distance of focus buona.rnPer who really begins to show itself to the world of photography is fine, but if you improve the quality of the shots will surely go a little tight.

sent on October 26, 2013


samyang_14Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical

Pros: Price, construction, good sharpness already at Ta, 2.8, sharpness

Cons: Distortion, fixed hood, lack exif data

Opinion: Objective really good, has a spectacular sharpness since 2.8, is very bright, shame about the manual focus, but at this price what do we want more? RNLA construction is excellent, the ring of soft Mf, perhaps the distance scale is not precisely accurate, but just put to infinity and the game is done, built-in hood which can be a Pro or against, depending on how you see it, it is very practical but at the same time a bit 'bulky, distortion a bit' too strong but easily correctable in PP, in conclusion has nothing to envy to the lenses that cost 5 times more. I recommend it to everyone.

sent on October 26, 2013


tamron_17-50Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD

Pros: Sharpness, constant aperture to 2.8, price, lens hood included

Cons: Af slow, a bit soft at 2.8, plasticky construction

Opinion: I took this lens "handyman" for my Canon 650D, and really surprised me almost throughout, the sharpness is good if a little soft at room temperature and at maximum excursion, to 17 mm has a bit of distortion and conditions low light sometimes cane focus, but just turn a bit and the problem vanishes, for the rest I have nothing to say, the price is affordable, it is light, photo quality really good, flare and nonexistent Color very faithful, my problem has no B / F focus, compared to the 18-55 Canon kit is another world, I would recommend.

sent on October 26, 2013


tamron_90macroTamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro

Pros: Quality / price ratio, sharpness, shift from Mf to Af, light, blurred

Cons: Autofocus slow and noisy, excursion barrel

Opinion: I literally fell in love with this lens, it has a great value for money and has a spectacular sharpness even at 2.8, would recommend to anyone who wants to take on the world of macro photography, the AF a bit slow and noisy but it does not seem a tragedy for the relative cost of this goal, and then we always talk about a macro lens, very practical system to switch from automatic to manual focus. I took off and hoped I will take away much satisfaction.

sent on October 26, 2013




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me