|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Tix976 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Tix976  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Moderately light | Good yield on DX Cons: Economical Construction | Repeated VR issues Opinion: I had a lot of problems with the VR of this lens, sent 2 times for assistance. I have always taken the utmost care of my equipment, with this perspective I have not been lucky. Once I fixed it I used both sports photography and for animal photos. At the beginning, in the first case, certainly more complex for me, I found the autofocus not always as fast as the situation would have needed, nothing serious and certainly due to my technical shortcomings. With the fauna it went much better, especially photographing still or slow-moving subjects from afar. Getting the hang of it, the situation has improved dramatically, and I find myself with what was written by darkly more experienced and capable users. sent on September 10, 2025 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Small size | Versatility | Although older, better than other "Kit" lenses of its time Cons: It suffers from age compared to more modern optics (perhaps) Opinion: My Nikon handyman, it was in kit with a D70s, then ported on the D300s acquired body only. I have always felt good, a lens that has accompanied me on many trips, allowing me to shoot everything with great versatility. I was fine with low light, so I had the 35mm f1.8 next to it It has always done its job very well, very reliable, AF that has never given me problems, good colors. Clearly the comparison with the luxury DX lenses could be seen, but it has always allowed me to bring home good results with both cameras, especially the D300s. To this day I don't know if it is still worth it, but it certainly deserves an honorable mention. sent on September 10, 2025 |
| Nikon AF-S DX 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Small size | Versatility | Although older, better than other "Kit" lenses of its time Cons: It suffers from age compared to more modern optics (perhaps) Opinion: My Nikon handyman, it was in kit with a D70s, then ported on the D300s acquired body only. I have always felt good, a lens that has accompanied me on many trips, allowing me to shoot everything with great versatility. I was fine with low light, so I had the 35mm f1.8 next to it It has always done its job very well, very reliable, AF that has never given me problems, good colors. Clearly the comparison with the luxury DX lenses could be seen, but it has always allowed me to bring home good results with both cameras, especially the D300s. To this day I don't know if it is still worth it, but it certainly deserves an honorable mention. sent on September 10, 2025 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Beautiful rendering | compact | allows very suggestive shots| Cons: New price | Difficult to master for a neophyte Opinion: Bought new many years ago, to take on a trip, it has given me a lot of satisfaction, but also a lot of headaches and disappointments. Not because it is not an excellent lens, at least for my judgment, but because in my opinion it is a lens that is not very permissive for the less experienced. Given the enormous angle of view, you have to master framing and exposure wisely so as not to waste the shot. It's a lens I've often made mistakes with, but when I've managed to tame it, it's always given me great satisfaction. Having used it today, for those who continue to use Nikon DX and love to photograph landscapes, it may definitely be worth it. I don't know what the 3rd party optics offer, but this 10-24, as long as you are in the right hands, can be defended very well. sent on September 10, 2025 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Compact, lightweight, economical, good yield. Cons: I'm not good enough to find any. Opinion: I bought this lens to use in combination with my old and glorious D300s. The main purpose was to have a bright lens to take photos at night when I am traveling. I used it mainly for that and for the price it has I had a lot of fun. Lightweight and absolutely not bulky, it allows you to walk through the streets of the city at night using artificial lights. It's a permissive lens at that juncture, my camera can't hold high Iso, but it has always been possible to correct the noise. I have always been fine, for the cost and the bulk in my opinion it should always be taken on a trip. sent on September 10, 2025 |
 | Nikon D300s Pros: Robustness, ergonomics, controls, versatility of use, performance for sports photos (amateur use) Cons: Size and weight. The other defects, I believe, are only due to the fact that it is not recent. Opinion: I've had the D300s for a very long time, I've used it with a fair amount of intensity. I am an absolutely amateur photographer, basic if you like. I have always had a great time in all conditions of use, when traveling and trying my hand at some sports photos. Even now for sports photos I would more willingly rely on it than on the new mirrorless that I gave myself (which for heaven's sake I still know little and is giving me different satisfactions) Battery of excellent durability, good files and easy to work. I love the fact that it has all the external controls at your fingertips, which allows you to change settings in a flash. Great for those who are good, but also to allow those like me, who do more than one, to correct the shot quickly. Never an AF problem if not for my mistakes, I still love to use it and I hope I can still have opportunities to do it when portability is not (for me( a problem. sent on September 10, 2025 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
