Reviews written by Francolori

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Francolori
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Francolori

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Francolori

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Panasonic GH5 S

Pros: Construction, lightness, sensitivity, dynamic range

Cons: For now the price that will probably soon come down and perhaps the lack of stabilization. For videos I do not care, for photos with bright wide angles (7-14 oly F2,8 and 12 oly F2) I did not have any photo moves even at night freehand

Opinion: Bought for videos, but for now only tried for photos on a trip to Florida. Exceptional for night photos thanks to the dynamic range and sensitivity, used automatically with the 12 F2 Olympus, the camera did not make a move picture and for now I have not developed the RAW (the photos are almost perfect in Jpg. Only some photos at sunrise and sunset will have to be corrected a little in lights and shadows). Today the first test in a video inside a church.

sent on January 26, 2019

Canon 5D Mark IV

Pros: Price practically halved, is located at just over 2000 euros, autofocus

Cons: Results looking at the image at 100% to say the least embarrassing, lower than the 6d not to mention the same optics on the Sony A9 and A7R3

Opinion: I have it for a few days and I'm trying it with Canon Optics and Sigma Art (85 1.2 L Canon latest series and Sigma Art 24-70 2.8) the photos seen at 100% lack definition in all shooting situations and at every Aperture. Won't that actually use 3 million pixel media, like it's a compact one-inch? I have to try it in dual pixel raw, but it does not seem a suitable solution for all those who do not want to post produce photos... proven for an outdoor session in dual pixel raw, the quality improves considerably, but I confirm the opinion that you can not use in no mode Rmale. Now on the net is even a little more than 1800 euros

sent on September 28, 2018

Sigma SD Quattro

Pros: Image quality that returns unmatched, and for the range of colors for the definition. Recovery of the shadows and very good lighting. File .jpg more than adequate (apart from the dynamic range)

Cons: It is not a machine for all kinds of pictures, certainly not for sports pictures in low light situations or photographic hunting. slow writing on the board and use as they used analog cameras. Grana already seen 400 asa although pleasant. It takes a long time to process the owner's raw form. It grows only with its original software (free). The JPG, which creates room is very good as the definition and color, but it is not comparable with the dynamic range you can get developing the raw. Battery that does not reach a hundred shots.

Opinion: I also have other far more expensive machines, but when I try a quality that reminds the colors of old slides and a definition where you read the details even more purposes in the distance, I'll take some time and go out with you ;-) optical rnCon Sigma relatively modest price comparison with Canon 5D m2 and 24 -105 f4 L is embarrassing (for Sigma). Of course look good on a monitor 100%

sent on April 18, 2017