|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nicola Pezzatini www.juzaphoto.com/p/NicolaPezzatini  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pros: Camera (with Google camera), fluidity, capacity, construction, price. Cons: Camera stock, proximity sensor, integration with some apps not yet perfect. Opinion: I bought for the first time a smartphone Xiaomi, given the excellent presentation and cost really insignificant. I was initially a little disappointed by the stock camera, creates an annoying effect "beauty filter", a real cinesata. By installing the Gcam I opened a world, surprisingly sharp photos even in low light and really beautiful colors. The fluidity of the gesture and the constructive solidity are good. Not much the proximity sensor, in call approaching not perfectly the phone in the ear happen to activate settings or open some app, really annoying. On the whole however a phone really extraordinary, I do not think there is better to this figure. sent on May 12, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price, sharpness, size, nice bokeh Cons: Sharpness under 2.8, maf, construction Opinion: It 'probably one of those lenses that anyone approaches photography sooner or later must necessarily buy, but it will become interesting and useful even when you are more experienced (at least for me) .rnThe construction is certainly not the best but remember that the price is around 100 € or little more.rnSurely not my favorite lens is not by chance the use infrequently, but for some sporadic portrait I would say that it is more than enough because the sharpness from 2.8 up is really good and the bokeh ... very pleasant ... rnNon very precise maf, sometimes a little slow and cumbersome, however, the quality-price ratio justifies the success of this lens over the years.rnNon I got to try the new STM version but I suppose it is better especially as regards the maf. sent on March 28, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Constructive quality, sharpness from f8 onwards, heaviness, colors, af, tropicalization Cons: Huge hood, sharpness at the edges Opinion: I bought it a few days to replace a 10-18 and the pace I did, although so far has had little opportunity to put it to the test, it seems more than discrete.rnLo mounted on APS-C (Canon 100D) but to part of the multiplication factor that makes it more a handyman than a real wide angle, you have the feeling of having in your hands a lens so much stuff.rnThe build quality is immediately denoted by the heaviness, shooting from f8 up sharpness becomes remarkable and the colors ottima.rnFrancamente I find it difficult to find fault, if we want to call them, the only ones can be the hood provided that is really giant and a very light (!) loss of sharpness at the edges. sent on March 27, 2018 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Dimensions, value for money, sharpness, quick and precise maf Cons: Light vignetting Opinion: Mounted on the 100D turns an SLR almost into a compact, in general at this price I find that the "pancake" is a remarkable lens.rnNititious sharpness, fast and precise focus, at this price difficult to ask for better, a perfect lens for both the landscape that for the street.rnFaccio really struggling to find some flaws but struggling I can detect a slight vignetting and even a slight distortion, adjustable in post in a second.rnOn the complex I would say that deserves a 9/10, gave me great joy ! sent on March 16, 2018 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Quality - price, lightness, AF, precise and fast maf Cons: Sharpness at the edges, build quality, resistance to flare practically nothing Opinion: Overall it is a good lens with which I felt good, the clarity of the shots is excellent in the central part, less at the edges where you lose significantly of quality.rnThe lens is light and precise and fast AF, however it has me disappointed the lack of resistance to flare.rnSicuramente is a lens that I recommend for the excellent value for money, no doubt we are not at the top levels but we still speak of a lens whose cost is around 200/250 € .rnAvoid attribute one vote I would give 7.5 / 10. sent on March 15, 2018 |
 | AmazonBasics - Zaino per fotocamera e accessori Pros: Lightness, comfort of the interior space, convenience, cost, pockets for filters Cons: Impermeability, hooking to the stand Opinion: Backpack, for my needs, has a great value for money. They 'very light, comfortable and easy to handle, internal pockets are roomy and can be well organized piacimento.rnMi has a little disappointed impermeability virtually nothing and docking for the tripod which is suitable only for small and light tripods, with other larger and heavier, "suffers" decisamente.rnNel Overall though, this figure, I would say that it is a good buy and I recommend it to me. sent on January 26, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Sharpness impressive 2.8 fixed, true color, brightness, price, lens hood Cons: AF a bit cumbersome and slow but acceptable Opinion: I think it is a really good lens, bright, sharpness (at any aperture) is really impressive and as for me the colors need very little PP. The difference between this lens and the 18-55 IS canon with which I replaced it is really abissale.rnA this price is not any better, the only downside is the AF a little slow and cumbersome, especially in conditions of low light, but nothing eccessivo.rnCONSIGLIATISSIMO! rn sent on July 14, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
