|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pazzia www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pazzia ![]() |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Image sharpness, versatility, speed and quiet autofocus, solid construction, tropicalization. Cons: Weight and dimensions do not really reduced, the rubber rings that after a while 'widens. Opinion: Purchased this lens more than 4 years ago, used to each use and always perfetti.rnOttimo results with both dx and fx, (although at first is a bit 'long) does not regret the fixed lenses, it is very nice and fuzzy makes the images in the foreground almost tridimensionali.rnLa lack of VR I never considerata.rnrnDa when I bought this objective, it is rarely removed from my car fotografica.rnrnUn optical handyman who is second to none. sent on May 17, 2013 |
![]() | Nikon D600 Pros: Ergonomics, Weight, FF Sensor Mode, U1 and U2, video quality, made at high ISO, sharpness, AF accuracy even in backlight, dual slot. Cons: Amateur camera body, AF area too clustered at the center of the viewfinder, viewfinder coverage to 95%, compressed RAW file but a bit 'heavy, A light Purple Fringing noticed backlit with a Croop 400%. Opinion: I state that the defects listed are the classic nit. RnPEr the rest I have this machine for 2 months, before I had a d300s, I deviso to sell because I do not do more sports photos, and having only ottice for FF, the d600 I seemed a fair upgrade, as the d800 has a file far too opulent for my esigenze.rnLa first thing that catches the eye is the light weight, the casing of the machine while retaining the classic robustness nikon, weighs much less than my old Nikon; the menu has remained unchanged and you're familiar with the machines pro and semipro will have no difficulty in reimpsotare the machine with their own impostazioni.rnEffettuati the first test shots, I notice that while the d300s with the upper limit of the ISO sensitivity of 1600 was, with this you work with confidence to 3200 and in case of necessity, even in 6400 you can not get a great file.rnL 'area of ??focus is perhaps too small, contrived is the same as the d7000 which is a DX, but honestly I have neverused a point of focus other than the central and the thing did not bother me more than tanto.rnLe photo, c ome in all the latest Nikon, tend to have a predominant greenish, which is easy to eliminate as descitto in other opinions. rnIl shooting menu, selector switch quickly u1 and u2, will be appreciated by those who spend between 2 types of photos frequently (eg landscape and portrait), the resolution of 24 megapixxel can work well in all areas, if amche honestly, now that you work on the web, who bisongio more than 10 megapixels? So even lovers Croop more stringent potrenno have fun! RnHo read on various forums, national and not the problems of dust on the sensor, my car does not have these defects, I had a hand in the other, and the latter has not given problems polvere.rnrnPer me it is a great product, versatile, lightweight, and if we want to understand how many econimico.rnNon (but there are a few) complain of the sensor and the yield at low ISO and very bright with optics. I blinded to stress it with pictures of leaves alberate against the light, with different optics (from 70-200 f2.8, 50 f.18, going to the 24-70 f2.8, the 105 macro) the only flaw Looking for the nit I noticed a slight Legero Purple Fringing noticed backlit with a 400% Croop, nothing serious, and above all it is known ONLY with extreme magnification and is so small (something like a diagonal of 2 pixels) sincerely believe that he had also the "old" but d300s I do not think I've ever notato.rnrnIn conclusion that those who have had major problems with this machine has been unfortunate, and I also believe that those who came from professional machine, have the wrong product: if you have a d3 and want to find the same quality and strength, and a new sensor, better to turn to a d4 or a Canon 5D Mark 3.rn sent on April 24, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me