|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Angor www.juzaphoto.com/p/Angor ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Pros: Weight, compactness, autofocus speed, overall robustness, filter diameter 58mm Cons: sharpness Opinion: I bought it to match the all-rounder zoom, first a 28-135, now a 24-105 L USM. Before I had the 70-200 F4, a completely different planet in terms of sharpness up to 200. But with a big flaw, or rather two: he often stayed at home, because it was too bulky (he needed a much longer case), and only reaches 200. The DO is in the same belt case as the 24-105 and I wear it almost always every time I take the SLR. The quality, as written by others, is not so indecent and, indeed, being able to close slightly, maintains a good definition on all focal lengths. I have it for at least 6-7 years, paid 600 euros at the time, and it will be a lens that I will sell only if I change the camera body format. And if it were to break and I wanted to spend more money to replace it, I would almost certainly buy it again (the doubt is only formal. If you need space or in any case you want something to really always carry with little hassle, but maintaining a more than decent quality, it is an excellent lens. Se si cerca le vette, meglio rivolgersi a more... But all in all, that wasn't even his destination. sent on December 19, 2022 |
![]() | Canon PowerShot S100 Pros: compact (obviously), native support for raw shooting, manual controls, excellent focal length 24-120 Cons: maybe battery life Opinion: I bought it to have a travel compact to keep in my pocket, but with the possibility of using the RAW. It has a very good image quality, to be a compact. Battery life also lower than other compact (I have a couple of the HS series, also similar as batteries but last longer). Considering it's a 2011 car, it was definitely good. sent on December 10, 2022 |
![]() | Canon G1X Mark II Pros: excellent focal range from all-rounder, Af quite fast (on static subjects), very customizable, built-in nd filter, excellent stabilizer that also works on video, compact size with closed lens (fits in your pocket), excellent customizable rings (two on the lens and one rear). Cons: poor battery life if you use the TS or keep the screen on a lot, lack of GPS and built-in viewfinder, few automatic functions / scenes compared to a compact of which I think shares part of the user Opinion: I bought it because I wanted something more portable than a DSLR and better than a compact. Since I have it, the SLR has often been at home. The g1x fits quietly in the pocket of a jacket, like a compact, but when you open the files at home, it does not regret too much the SLR (and I'm talking about a 5DMkii with 24-105L). I was thinking then to take the mkIII, but I must say that I did not appreciate the choice of canon to reduce the range to 24-70 eq, a choice that for me does not fit a non-interchangeable lens machine. And so I kept the mkII. sent on November 22, 2022 |
![]() | Pentacon 300mm f/4 Pros: impressive construction, excellent focus even diaphragmatic, excellent detail and sharpness across the diaphragm Cons: weight Opinion: it's an imposing goal, big and heavy: I do not think it has only one plastic part (maybe plastic did not even exist when it was built). From what I have read on the web, it should have been designed for medium format (or something similar), which justifies both the size and the exceptional rendering on the whole frame also of the FF.rnThe focus requires the whole hand that, therefore, can not support the same goal.rnIo I used it with a monopod, which facilitates and makes it almost simple to focus.rnrn With due care, I also photographed car races, just focus in advance where you will then take and I must admit that the photos discarded outside were always few, same order of magnitude of a medium-range AF lens.rnrnIt 'really a great piece of glass ... and is a 300 f4.rn sent on March 21, 2018 |
![]() | Canon EF 35-135mm f/4-5.6 USM Pros: lightweight, compact, USM true, all metal, clear Cons: relatively dark, not stabilized, the 35mm Opinion: I purchased it as a "pre-test" to purchase the 28-135, basically just to try to have a zoom that came to 135mm.rnL 'I kept it for about 1 year and I must say I was not disappointed in anything . The move to the 28-135 I then made just because it is starting from 35mm wide angle and a little penalized in the absence of stabilizzatore.rnrnE 'However, a lens of the old school: all metal, inner fire, and from the point of view constructive you eat literally all plasticotti odierni.rnPer those looking for a handyman oriented canvases, that is certainly about 100-120 euro to which it is usato.rn sent on April 19, 2013 |
![]() | Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: focal range of FF "handyman", light, sharp, stabilized, USM true Cons: loss of detail at the edges, focal range suitable for little handyman on aps-c Opinion: I have tried several objectives to be used as a "handyman" on the 5D: 24-70, 28-80, 28-105, and in the end I always found too short, the "tele". rnL'ho purchased for its 135mm, despite the bad reputation to discover that it is, in part, immeritata.rnOvvero, the loss of detail at the edges exist, but in the conditions of use "by jack of all trades" is difficiolmente detectable if not going after her : hardly, in fact, the central subject in a picture with the edge of the photo contains elements in focus. rnrnIn hand, those 135mm, together with the stabilizer is also much more effective than what I had read around (better, IMHO, than the 18-55IS which should be 1 stop higher), make it an excellent travel companion on FF.rnrnPS: my exemplary seems not suffer any of the problems of solidity described by others: only and does not stretch from the extracted game has a relatively small, though comparable to that of other zoom extensible. Of course, it gives the impression of smontarsi.rnrn sent on April 19, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me