Reviews written by Lutaf

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Lutaf
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lutaf

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Lutaf

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Tamron SP 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD

Pros: value for money, lightweight

Cons: footprint at maximum focal length, slow autofocus, lack stabilizer

Opinion: The construction is of decent quality and is light enough. It can be used both at the pump with the ring. At the maximum focal length of the lens is a lever arm sensitive. The optical quality is good. A 500mm is comparable to 400mm canon 100-400. The autofocus is slow and not always capture the lens or follows it. This rules out the birdlife. With the attack of my 5D mark III is a small game. The lack of stabilizer feels. On the other hand for the price with which you can buy, is a good lens that allows you to explore distant subjects, without depauperarti. With the APSC becomes a 800mm, but the image quality will expire a little. And 'well not use it with duplicating machines, because the autofocus does not work and the quality dacade.

sent on April 22, 2013

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM

Pros: Sharpness, autofocus, construction

Cons: weight, price

Opinion: Excellent from all points of view. Purchase is a small investment. The autofocus has an incredible rate. It 's very clear. Makes colors faithfully. You can safely use with duplicators. The weight feels and how! I have given a vote of 10, but as zoom. But do not let us compare it to fixed lenses of the same focal length and quality, please!

sent on April 11, 2013

Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

Pros: compact, well built, light, air a little 'retro

Cons: price

Opinion: I had it on trial for a week, along with the Zuiko 14-42 and 12-35 to Panasonic, and I found it more than the equivalent of the two focal zoom. Returns good images without distortion and aberrations evident. Corresponds to a 35 mm ff and is a good lens to always carry and be exploited in various shooting situations. And 'quite bright and coupled to the excellent stabilizer inside of OM d, ensures valid shooting in low light. Also valid in shooting video, to focus manually, because in the screens, autofocus "pompeggia" a bit '. In my opinion it is the best lens for OM d, at the time of this test.

sent on April 03, 2013

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

Pros: Well built, excellent optical quality, lighter and cheaper counterparts of Canon and Nikon

Cons: Does not interact with the camera, as regards the correction of vignetting and chromatic aberration.

Opinion: I have a 5D Mark II and I could try the lens for a week, thanks to a dealer friend who had sold me the Canon counterpart and wanted my opinion on the field. I can say that the resolution and the image quality is excellent. It 'just slower than the Canon nell'autofocus during photo hunting of birds. Costs 600 euro less, according to the price of the dealer in question and I think the savings will affect your choice. Of course, my evidence is empirical: Mac screen (2500 to 1400) and Photoshop camera Raw, magnification 100/200 per cent and looking up at the corners of the image, with some cropping and subsequent printing. Great lens. LuTaf.

sent on March 26, 2013