RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Omarcorti
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Omarcorti



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Omarcorti


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

dji_mavic_miniDJI Mavic Mini

Pros: Maneuverability, ease of use, little bureaucracy, battery life.

Cons: Noise to all ISOs, no DNG.

Opinion: I wanted a drone that was simple to use, stable, with a good image quality and that didn't force me to do a thousand practices and shell out money for anything. The Mini was a good purchase: it pilots very easily and has a remarkable flight stability even in the presence of wind. The batteries last the right (about 27 min) and the range of use in image fluidity is more than enough even in the environment with many interferences (500m in the city and no lag on Ios). It's small, already at 80m you see it with fatigue and the gyr color is not quite right, at least the position light helps. From the photo sector you can not expect too much but it does not get bad, the videos are good but the have a lot of noise already at 100 iso and the current firmware applies by default an excess of sharpness especially on vertical lines; The wb is very good and the colors rather natural with a decent dynamic range. I would say the drone with the best price/performance ratio currently available, useless to take the superior models (they cost a lot and the images that churn are the same) unless you spend absurd amounts.

sent on January 16, 2020


manfrotto_058bManfrotto 058B

Pros: Solid, serious, heavy and precise

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: It has a few years on the shoulders but remains the perfect studio tripod, just lengthen only one section to have the ideal medium height; The unique leg release system is extremely intuitive and effective. I use it with 1d MK4 with several long lenses and 410 rack head: It never makes a vibration. Loved.

sent on February 21, 2019


amazonbasics_treppiede_leggero_152cmAmazonBasics Treppiede leggero 152cm

Pros: Price

Cons: Unstable, fragile, poor materials and workmanship

Opinion: You find it rebranded under various brands but the model is always the same. Taken years ago as the first lightweight tripod turned out to be very poor. The head hooks badly and does not lock in a solid way, at any minimum adjustment vibrates for a long time, the tubes are very thin, the joints are made of plastic and the couplings are very comfortable. Not even worth the few euros that costs, definitely discouraged.

sent on November 22, 2018


canon_70-300doCanon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM

Pros: Size, RING USM, STABILIZED

Cons: Unbalanced forward, tendency to leak, slight counterlight loss of contrast

Opinion: Bought from England to €350 on FF and APS-H I have not found all the problems of sharpness that you read around (will be a well-managed copy...!). Excellent focal range and is quietly in the backpack, it is not white and you notice little, fast and precise focus without uncertainties and the stabilizer is very effective. Excellent sharpness at F8 a little softer to TA, zero chromatic aberrations. I thought a lot before taking it and read a thousand reviews but in the end despite the doubts was excellent and much better expectations, at 300 and TA there is certainly better but overall has never given me unusable images, indeed. Real ones in a slight drop in contrast against light due to the construction DO but the lens hood helps a lot and the fact that for the weight of the front element the barrel tends to leak if pointed downward.

sent on October 27, 2018


canon_50_f1-8stmCanon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM

Pros: sharpness, brightness, price/performance ratio

Cons: No obvious

Opinion: Purchased for whim to replace the 1.8 II; From the optical point of view very similar but the new 7 blades of the diaphragm give a blurred less edgy, you can approach more to the subject and I find it slightly more defined. As construction is blatantly more solid, it no longer has that noise of scrap metal when it focuses and less uncertainty. In General It is a lens to have almost a requirement for what it costs.

sent on October 27, 2018


tamron_500_f8spTamron SP 500 f/8.0 Model 55B

Pros: Compact size, excellent construction, excellent relationship between spending and results

Cons: Not crystal clear, hard to use, inability to deal with the depth of field

Opinion: Bought it for business needs, having to photograph architecture with good resolution with a single point of view to over 2km.rnPer the expenditure, about 200 € complete with a 2x multiplier, the images obtained are satisfactory although abbisogna a lot of practice to be utilizzato.rnLavorando with exposure times around to 1/1000 will have the best results.

sent on August 07, 2013


tamron_90macroTamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro

Pros: Price, excellent sharpness, lightness, recessed lens, 1:1 ratio

Cons: AF slow, high extension

Opinion: I use it as the only macro lens because I think it is a very high quality lens, the 90 mm is more than enough. The color rendition is flawless and remains crystal clear even at full aperture with a great focus. Ring focus large and very precise, recessed lens and light are other strengths. Highly recommended.

sent on March 08, 2013


canon_40dCanon 40D

Pros: Solid and incredibly reliable, excellent RAW, AF, ergonomics and overall quality

Cons: ISO is not very high, no microtatatura

Opinion: Using the 40D recently, but the difference with the old 350D is abysmal: access to the settings, the picture quality that produces the sensation of having it in hand strength, speed autofocus. RnDirei that still holds head very well to many corps level recenti.rnUnica flaw that finding is the low ISO (up to 1600, 3200 in H, but too much noise for a good use) that could be a problem with the objectives less bright.

sent on February 13, 2013


sigma_18-200osSigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM

Pros: Focal size, robust, cost

Cons: Soft, just enough OS, dim

Opinion: I use it as a handyman from vacation not to carry all your lenses. In optimal light can be considered fair and for what it costs is just fine. The stabilizer is compatible with the tripod but just turn it off. The colors are slightly tending toward shades calde.rnNon will be a lens optically very qualitative but it is difficult not to find the right shot.

sent on February 10, 2013




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me