|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Egix90 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Egix90  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: price hike, effective stabilization, made decent fire, good image quality Cons: construction, some variability of the specimens, brightness, focus Opinion: Always consider the price at which you can also find new, very convenient, so the flaws are there but almost "inevitable." The lens is a must to always have on hand, portraits, landscapes, reporting, you can do everything. Needless to mention the pro, you all know by now, so I will pass directly to the hand, to better explain the ones I added. -Construction Is certainly well made, but it is a great plasticone, not from a sense of reliability, but does his duty. -Variabilità Specimens: I Have had two, one for and one for Canon Nikon, Canon in the sample, for example, I noticed a certain dominant blue / purple, sometimes very annoying, forcing a few more steps in the post. In what Nikon, however, this dominance does not seem to see it, but I found a slightly increased noise stabilizer, compared to Canon model. A bit 'wide sleeves, probably, the qu controlsality, but it always comes back to price discourse .... Brightness: well yes, it's a little dark, when the sun begins to set, the ISO rise very quickly. The low-light also leads to the next problem; Levelling-focus: that if one part is pretty quick and quiet, the other goes completely broke down when the light begins to run low, and it is here that the low brightness does not help. All in all a very good buy, does its job, and does it well in the right conditions. It lies very easily in the used market, but often the price is too close to that of the new online. sent on March 24, 2016 |
 | Nokia Lumia 1020 Pros: camera compartment, creative applications nokia navigator, screen, WP8 Cons: battery is not removable, battery life, expandable memory, WP8, price Opinion: confinement factor which falls suffered by both the pro and the cons: Windows Phone 8. Pros: simple, intuitive, innovative, always fluid and fast, always in constant update. Cons: It is still young, there are things to improve as the management of multitasking and notifications, a little 'more customization, and especially the applications, there are few, even less free ones, and they are made very very bad. For speech applications, I knew what I was getting migrating from Android to WP8, but because the applications I used most frequently (a few to be honest) were there, I was not disappointed that much, despite what the job is still much to do, although this is not due directly to Microsoft, but they have to support and encourage developers to work on WP8. For its part, Nokia has done a great lavorone, all of its preloaded apps are excellent and constantly updated. Regarding the camera part, the potentials are amazing, The 41mpx are not just a marketing tool, but the results give clear, highly detailed picture and bright chance to reframe the scene even after you take (if you zoom and shoot, then there is always the possibility of enlarge the picture), effective stabilizer, video with an audio / video quality amazing, even zoom in while shooting video, manual control of shooting parameters very large, the audio recording is always perfect even when using external applications (eg notes whatsapp audio). The navigator with maps and offline browsing (Android does not allow navigation without internet), it fits very well and automatically triggers a car mode that example reads the incoming messages. For the moment, the price is still higher end even in the web store, you do not absolutely take into account the prices in the shops, beyond any logic sent on December 14, 2013 |
 | Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 Pros: brightness, colors, compact Cons: soft at room temperature, on a distant subject has an almost soft focus Opinion: purchased for just over 100 € from a user here on the forum, is a lens that gives me so much satisfaction. very warm colors and full-bodied, the same picture taken with the Tamron 17/50 is more "cool". is very compact for a 50 1.4, the blur is nice but nothing special, at least in my opinion. Fine bargain really a sent on September 09, 2013 |
 | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Price (paid 25 € complete with adapter), blur, sharpen (for 25 € is a blade), very smooth focus ring, the final rendering, video Cons: no resistance to flare, you may not use more than the other goals! Opinion: excellent lens, has a yield beautiful, soft blur, and in the presence of light behind the subject, creates "buckshot" absolutely pleasant. although it is not resistant to flare (90% of the photos unusable), in the presence of the light, the contrast tends to zero, which in pp is easy to fix, and sometimes it is almost an advantage. for video is phenomenal. sent on August 19, 2013 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: the price (especially used); possibility of making video in full-HD, for those who like to tinker, one of the few compatible with the alternative firmware MagicLantern, especially useful for those who make videos, excellent screen, intuitive menu and easy access Cons: the ISO, 800 is still decent, 1600 on rare occasions, as well as deprecated, without battery grip is not very easy to handle mono sound recording; flurry very low Opinion: deliberately ignoring the video aspects, as a function that do not even use, this is my first SLR, and I can only speak well. with a battery grip is almost perfect, as well as increase autonomy (I do not remember the last time I recharged), makes it much more maneggevola and the grip is more secure. the only flaw in comparison to younger sisters (600 and 650D) is the screen is not adjustable, useful in shooting conditions a bit "strange", touch and various tweaks in the room you are cute, but I think they are so useful. the image quality is not bad, but do not to crop too much. I would recommend as the first reflex, as something more than the entry-level, and allows you to learn all the basic rules of photography sent on June 08, 2013 |
 | Soligor 135mm f/2.8 Pros: price, brightness Cons: AC and purple fringe obvious, all those little perspective from vintage price Opinion: this point falls into that category of objectives that, despite the many factors against (manual focus, chromatic aberration evident, obvious purple fringe, trouble shoot handheld given the fairly long focal length) worth owning, and for the price really cheap (it cost almost more the adapter provided with slide focus to infinity and the chip for the confirmation of focus) and for the yield of the fuzzy and the picture in general. by a magic touch to photographs, a vintage touch as much as the lens itself. work is not easy, but for some shots dabbling in particular is really good! sent on June 08, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
