RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Il Vime
www.juzaphoto.com/p/IlVime



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Il Vime


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

tamron_28-200rxdTamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD

Pros: Weight, footprint, cost, focal excursion, good sharpness.

Cons: Af not always accurate, poor resistance to flares, build quality, blurry not at the top, lack of stabilization.

Opinion: Definitely a great all-rounder at a more than honest price. Attracted by those extra 100 mm, I wanted to try it well, with the intention of replacing the Sony 24-105G. The spark didn't go off. First of all, the thing I feared the most is the 28mmm at the bottom, those 4mm difference from Sony are an abyss for the way I photograph. Also compared to Sony I found a less responsive autofocus (especially with the af eye), a blurry one less pleasant, a lower backlight resistance and, in general, a sharpness/resolution not at the top (which heck there stands, for a low-cost superzoom so). The build quality is obviously cheap, but it still looks good. The lack of stabilization, in critical light conditions, you feel, there is none. Personally I also felt the lack of the Sony customization button, which once used (in my case as eye af),it's hard to go back. Weight and footprint: they have done a small miracle, it is really compact and also mates well with small bodies like the A6400. As far as I'm concerned, however, I should make too many compromises and I prefer to continue with Sony.

sent on August 27, 2020


dji_mavic_proDJI Mavic Pro

Pros: Ease of use, lightness and transportability. Incredible strong wind resistance ... is so stable to allow double exposures (see some of my photos here) and the videos seem to be made by a helicopter.Ottima camera.Validissima "tripod mode "Which further stabilizes the drone and the Active Track. Battery life. Extensive use range.

Cons: 1: The application of the DJI (only in English) has been updated recently (mandatory login, displaying on-the-fly zones and those with map restrictions etc ...) but after this upgrade they started the "rogne "Numerous crashes during flights and abnormal errors, with the risk of losing / crashing the drone. Just look at the Android Play Store of thousands of reviews (bad) after the update in mid-May (before it was a jewel). DJI fix it soon (applies to all drums DJI) .rn2: Great camera ... but: who like me comes from reflexes (full frame and not) will have to keep up opening the first Raw ... details and definition not They are, of course, the same. Possibility of modifying the diaphragm manually (on the Phantom 4 Pro it is possible). Slow resistance to flare and backlight (unnecessary accessories currently on the market such as "cover-gimball" and filters). The limited resolution of the sensor does not allow recuperation Of high lights and shadows (you canObserve as mentioned before, with double exposures ... but it is not always possible) rn3: Obstacles sensing sensors present just in front and under the drone ... flying sideways without visual control, the drone encountering an obstacle will obviously crash.rn4 : Enac Regulation still very confusing and unclear ... but this applies to all drones.

Opinion: Although there are many "counter" that I have mentioned above ... the Mavic Pro is a jewel, a small masterpiece of unthinkable technology until recently. Needless to say that using a drone opens (photograpically speaking) a new world, I started to appreciate again places that I had tired of photographing ... here obviously the prospects are unique. It is highly recommended to buy additional "feet" to attack the drone, as it is too low ... and it becomes dangerous if you have to Landing on land not perfectly flat (they are in the net worth about ten euros) .... also recommended the Landing Pad that (in addition to avoiding dirt, grass, dust, etc ...) allows the drone to acquire a larger Precision during the "gohome", using Precision Landing, the drone recognizes the exact location it took off by taking a photo ... and (in a meadow for example) will identify it with greater ease when landing. For those who do not want compromises on the camera, it's better to opt forFor the most powerful (and much bigger) Phantom 4 Pro ... or wait for the second version that rumors expect in the coming months. The real problem remains, as mentioned before, the DJI App that is currently unreliable.

sent on June 17, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me