JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The DJI Mavic Pro is a compact camera with 1/2.3" (5.6x) sensor and 12 megapixels manufactured from 2016 to 2018 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 3200 ISO. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 995 €;
16 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 205000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Fun, unique viewpoints, fantastic shots, simplicity of use
Cons:It has no diaphragm control, poor noise tightness above the 200 ISO
Opinion:What to say, it's making me fun like never before, in the respect of the law we can't fly it everywhere, but when I can unload three batteries, I would never stop. Pilotarlo is a breeze, it reaches truly remarkable distances. When it's outside the field of vision, I always get anxiety... But it'il be over time. Too bad you can't intervene on the diaphragm. In sport mode it arrives at 70 per hour, reaching a certain point for a shot is a moment. Above the 800 ISO does a lot of effort, but so much for law has to fly only by day, at what point with 200 ISO and the fixed aperture at 2.2 We bring home any shot, but I recommend working at 100 ISO and with the tripod mode inserted.
Pros:Portability, maneuverability, camera, control distance, battery life
Cons:Obscene iso estate
Opinion:I come from a phantom 3 Pro, and I must say that this drone is fantastic, when I put it in a backpack along with the camera, really practical.Very good the dynamic range of Raw files, very bad the hold at high ISO, just exceeded the 150 ISO is already perceived a lot of grain. For the rest really fantastic, I recommend it!
user76261
sent on October 10, 2017
Pros:Portability.
Cons:In order of importance: 1) Mandatory login 2) Landing landing sticker 3) Excessive cost 4) Crash application on many devices.
Opinion:DJI to fly his drones made the login compulsory. It means that in Shenzhen they will know where and how much they fly. Not only. Severe criticisms are raining on DJIs when it was discovered that once logged in after login the device sent dozens of data and pointers to third-party sites. Compulsory login has ceased to many - at first - the use of drones of the DJI company. Always in the field of the application to drive the Mavic we have noted a considerable level of instability on many devices. Of course, in my way of seeing I have encountered the following problems: rnThe landing trolley is non-existent and can not always be taken off or landing from the hand. since a friend of mine left us two fingers because of the wind on landing. The cost of 1499 euros is excessive. There are other drones that for professional use cost one fifth of the Mavic. For example, MiDrone4K occupies a limited footprint, excellent stability and costs 370 euros. At the cost of the Mavic you buy 3 with its backpack. If it does use it, love itI really think it's great to have a good connection - when stable - between radio remote control and drone.rn For professional use there are many drivers who have chosen the Phantom4 pro with an inch sensor. rnIt take into account that Mavic and Spark (the latter even more small) after one hundred meters disappear to the sight.
Pros:Compactness and portability, ease of use, radio remote control (distance and height), 4K, Raw picture, battery life, easy propeller replacement, effective stabilization.
Cons:Moire 'in 1080 to 60fps video, no mechanical shutter and rolling shutter, Gimbal extremely delicate, little dynamic range, difficult to take off in many places because it's low, learn how to take off and land.
Opinion:Mavic is a wonder. It's fast, easy, small, lightweight, has a good camera with a good field angle (28mm equivalent) but obviously with some kind of video photo-limitations. As far as video is concerned, the limitations are obviously a 4k limited to 30 fps (or 24). It would be nice to have it at 60fps too. The FHD at 60 is often subject to moire, but have changed the sensor in the Platinum version so they should have solved it (but it's about to buy Platinum ...). Gimbal is very effective but very delicate. Useful are ND side-to-side video filters to reduce shutter speeds. It has no diaphragm and the brightness af / 2.2 brings very high shutter speed in full light, so the use of NDs is compulsory (I recommend the Polarpro). DO NOT use the Pano function instead of Spark, which is extremely good. Anyway for the Pano I recommend using the camera in portrait mode and making stitching in Photomerge, they are pressoche 'perfect. I have Apple Iphone and the DJIgo4 App never gave me a problembut I understand that with Android there is some App crash problem and signal loss.
Pros:Dimensions, in-flight stability and / or strong wind, good video / photo side, battery life, in-flight speed
Cons:Receiving problems, Gimball a bit too delicate in my opinion, continuous DJI app crash (also in airplane mode on the LG G5), distance from land on landing, unpractical side, disturbing drop in sharpness in backlight
Opinion:I owned this drone, the only one I had. Whatever it is, the quality is all and is evident. Powerful engines, it's not a toy and I really recommend flying outdoors only the first few times to make short flights to get familiar with the commands. Returning to Mavic PRO, I took the KIT Combo (which I recommend) and is worth the money spent. Unfortunately, I sold it because I prefer to take photos with reflexes and I was a bit disappointed with the photo side of the drone. On video nothing to say, the videos are of high quality. Unhappy photos for one used to shooting with a FF reflex are at a compact level a few years ago. Shadow / Lights recovery is enough, the backlight detail is mid-range smartphones, and in general, full-size files do not allow any quality work. However, in good conditions, you can still take good photos. From a technical point of view, my drone after a perfect first period started to miss the signal during the flight. Once again I saw him walk away for several hundred yards and then go back (I had put the return to home). Another time the signal that was reported to be excellent was gone and I had to ride around a lake for over 500mt to get the drone back under my control. From this point of view I do not know if I had a mischievous model or whether it is a firware issue or something else. I was disappointed and I never really felt safe in the reliability of the drone. At the end I saw the fear of losing it during the flights and the little use that I made I sold it to finance optics for my reflex (no choice was wiser). RnrnIn conclusion i tell you: if you are looking for a light drone to travel take it. If you have long videos and would like to take a different shot than usual take it. If you are a novice you do not waste your money. Take a less expensive model that probably after a while will tire you and sell it by losing less. RnrnSecure is an interesting and innovative product but not exempt fromwhich, unfortunately, undermine the final evaluation. rnVoto: 8
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.